UFC on FUEL TV: Silva vs. Stann: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 2, 2013·Saitama, Japan
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC on FUEL TV: Silva vs. Stann lands on Saturday, March 2, 2013 in Saitama, Japan with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Wanderlei Silva vs Brian StannLight HeavyweightBrian StannLean60%
Mark Hunt vs Stefan StruveHeavyweightMark HuntToss-up53%
Diego Sanchez vs Takanori GomiLightweightDiego SanchezConfident67%
Yushin Okami vs Hector LombardMiddleweightYushin OkamiConfident67%
Rani Yahya vs Mizuto HirotaFeatherweightMizuto HirotaToss-up54%
Dong Hyun Kim vs Siyar BahadurzadaWelterweightDong Hyun KimToss-up52%
Brad Tavares vs Riki FukudaMiddleweightBrad TavaresConfident67%
Takeya Mizugaki vs Bryan CarawayBantamweightBryan CarawayLean55%
Kazuki Tokudome vs Cristiano MarcelloLightweightKazuki TokudomeToss-up50%
Alex Caceres vs Kyung Ho KangBantamweightAlex CaceresLean62%
Hyun Gyu Lim vs Marcelo GuimaraesWelterweightMarcelo GuimaraesToss-up51%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Wanderlei Silva vs Brian Stann

Light Heavyweight
60%
Brian Stann
Silva
4-7
Elo 1282
Knockout Artist
VS
Stann
6-4
Elo 1077
Knockout Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Wanderlei Silva (4-7) taking on Brian Stann (6-4).

Silva is rated at 1282 — 205 points above Stann's 1077. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stann throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brian Stann over Wanderlei Silva. The model gives Stann a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Mark Hunt vs Stefan Struve

Heavyweight
53%
Mark Hunt
Hunt
8-7-1
Elo 1169
Striker
VS
Struve
13-10
Elo 878
All-Rounder

The Heavyweight matchup features Mark Hunt (8-7-1) taking on Stefan Struve (13-10). Struve is the bigger frame at 6'11" with a 12-inch reach advantage.

Hunt is rated at 1169 — 291 points above Struve's 878. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Hunt brings a versatile approach, while Struve is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Struve the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Struve throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Hunt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Hunt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Hunt over Stefan Struve. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hunt at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
Diego Sanchez
Sanchez
19-12
Elo 1139
Striker
VS
Gomi
4-8
Elo 732
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Diego Sanchez (19-12) taking on Takanori Gomi (4-8). Sanchez is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Sanchez is rated at 1139 — 408 points above Gomi's 732. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gomi throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Sanchez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Gomi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Sanchez over Takanori Gomi. We're leaning Sanchez here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

67%
Yushin Okami
Okami
14-6
Elo 1061
Wrestler
VS
Lombard
3-7
Elo 964
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Yushin Okami (14-6) taking on Hector Lombard (3-7). Okami is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Okami at 1061 versus Lombard at 964. That 97-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Okami's striker game against Lombard's all-rounder approach. Okami brings a versatile approach, while Lombard is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lombard throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Lombard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Okami has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yushin Okami over Hector Lombard. We're leaning Okami here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Rani Yahya vs Mizuto Hirota

Featherweight
54%
Mizuto Hirota
Yahya
13-5-1
Elo 1030
Wrestler
VS
Hirota
1-4-1
Elo 777
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Rani Yahya (13-5-1) taking on Mizuto Hirota (1-4-1).

Yahya is rated at 1030 — 253 points above Hirota's 777. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Yahya's wrestler game against Hirota's striker approach. Yahya looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Hirota brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yahya throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Yahya is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Hirota has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mizuto Hirota over Rani Yahya. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hirota at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

52%
Dong Hyun Kim
Kim
13-3
Elo 1318
All-Rounder
VS
Bahadurzada
4-3
Elo 1086
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Dong Hyun Kim (13-3) taking on Siyar Bahadurzada (4-3). Kim is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Kim is rated at 1318 — 232 points above Bahadurzada's 1086. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Kim rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Kim looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Bahadurzada is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Kim the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bahadurzada throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Kim is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Bahadurzada has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dong Hyun Kim over Siyar Bahadurzada. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Kim at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Brad Tavares vs Riki Fukuda

Middleweight
67%
Brad Tavares
Tavares
16-10
Elo 925
Striker
VS
Fukuda
2-2
Elo 967

The Middleweight matchup features Brad Tavares (16-10) taking on Riki Fukuda (2-2).

Fukuda carries a modest Elo edge (967 to 925), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fukuda throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Fukuda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Fukuda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Tavares over Riki Fukuda. We're leaning Tavares here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

55%
Bryan Caraway
Mizugaki
8-5
Elo 995
Striker
VS
Caraway
6-3
Elo 1191
Wrestler

The Bantamweight matchup features Takeya Mizugaki (8-5) taking on Bryan Caraway (6-3).

Caraway is rated at 1191 — 197 points above Mizugaki's 995. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Mizugaki's striker game against Caraway's wrestler approach. Mizugaki brings a versatile approach, while Caraway looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mizugaki throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Caraway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Caraway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Bryan Caraway over Takeya Mizugaki. The model gives Caraway a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

50%
Kazuki Tokudome
Tokudome
1-2
Elo 841
VS
Marcello
1-2
Elo 848

The Lightweight matchup features Kazuki Tokudome (1-2) taking on Cristiano Marcello (1-2).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Tokudome at 841, Marcello at 848. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marcello throws significantly more leather — a 4.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Marcello is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Tokudome has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kazuki Tokudome over Cristiano Marcello. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Tokudome at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

62%
Alex Caceres
Caceres
16-12
Elo 1232
All-Rounder
VS
Kang
8-4
Elo 1029
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Alex Caceres (16-12) taking on Kyung Ho Kang (8-4).

Caceres is rated at 1232 — 203 points above Kang's 1029. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Caceres's knockout artist game against Kang's all-rounder approach. Caceres is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Kang is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Caceres throws significantly more leather — a 4.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Caceres is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Kang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex Caceres over Kyung Ho Kang. The model gives Caceres a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Marcelo Guimaraes
Lim
3-3
Elo 875
Knockout Artist
VS
Guimaraes
2-1
Elo 931

The Welterweight matchup features Hyun Gyu Lim (3-3) taking on Marcelo Guimaraes (2-1). Lim is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Guimaraes carries a modest Elo edge (931 to 875), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guimaraes throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Guimaraes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Lim has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marcelo Guimaraes over Hyun Gyu Lim. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Guimaraes at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.