The Ultimate Fighter: United States vs. United Kingdom Finale: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, June 20, 2009·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

The Ultimate Fighter: United States vs. United Kingdom Finale lands on Saturday, June 20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 10 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Diego Sanchez vs Clay GuidaLightweightDiego SanchezLean56%
James Wilks vs DaMarques JohnsonWelterweightDaMarques JohnsonLean64%
Chris Lytle vs Kevin BurnsWelterweightChris LytleLean60%
Ross Pearson vs Andre WinnerLightweightRoss PearsonToss-up52%
Joe Stevenson vs Nate DiazLightweightJoe StevensonToss-up50%
Melvin Guillard vs Gleison TibauLightweightGleison TibauToss-up53%
Brad Blackburn vs Edgar GarciaWelterweightBrad BlackburnLean60%
Tomasz Drwal vs Mike CiesnoleviczLight HeavyweightTomasz DrwalConfident69%
Nick Osipczak vs Frank LesterWelterweightFrank LesterToss-up53%
Jason Dent vs Cameron DollarLightweightCameron DollarLean60%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

56%
Diego Sanchez
Sanchez
19-12
Elo 1139
Striker
VS
Guida
18-18
Elo 926
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Diego Sanchez (19-12) taking on Clay Guida (18-18). Sanchez is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Sanchez is rated at 1139 — 214 points above Guida's 926. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Sanchez's knockout artist game against Guida's wrestler approach. Sanchez is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Guida looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guida throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Guida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Guida has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Sanchez over Clay Guida. The model gives Sanchez a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

64%
DaMarques Johnson
Wilks
2-1
Elo 995
VS
Johnson
4-5
Elo 841
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features James Wilks (2-1) taking on DaMarques Johnson (4-5).

Wilks is rated at 995 — 154 points above Johnson's 841. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: DaMarques Johnson over James Wilks. The model gives Johnson a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Chris Lytle vs Kevin Burns

Welterweight
60%
Chris Lytle
Lytle
9-10
Elo 1330
Submission Artist
VS
Burns
2-2
Elo 855

The Welterweight matchup features Chris Lytle (9-10) taking on Kevin Burns (2-2). Burns will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Lytle is rated at 1330 — 475 points above Burns's 855. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lytle throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Lytle is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Lytle has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Lytle over Kevin Burns. The model gives Lytle a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

52%
Ross Pearson
Pearson
12-12
Elo 849
Striker
VS
Winner
2-3
Elo 911
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Ross Pearson (12-12) taking on Andre Winner (2-3). Winner is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Winner carries a modest Elo edge (911 to 849), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Winner throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Winner is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Winner has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ross Pearson over Andre Winner. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pearson at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Joe Stevenson vs Nate Diaz

Lightweight
50%
Joe Stevenson
Stevenson
8-7
Elo 907
Wrestler
VS
Diaz
15-11
Elo 1557
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Joe Stevenson (8-7) taking on Nate Diaz (15-11). Diaz is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Diaz is rated at 1557 — 650 points above Stevenson's 907. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diaz throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Diaz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Stevenson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joe Stevenson over Nate Diaz. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Stevenson at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

53%
Gleison Tibau
Guillard
12-8
Elo 1177
All-Rounder
VS
Tibau
16-11
Elo 1019
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Melvin Guillard (12-8) taking on Gleison Tibau (16-11).

Guillard is rated at 1177 — 158 points above Tibau's 1019. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Guillard's knockout artist game against Tibau's wrestler approach. Guillard is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Tibau looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guillard throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Tibau is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Guillard has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gleison Tibau over Melvin Guillard. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Tibau at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

60%
Brad Blackburn
Blackburn
3-1
Elo 943
VS
Garcia
0-3
Elo 650

The Welterweight matchup features Brad Blackburn (3-1) taking on Edgar Garcia (0-3).

Blackburn is rated at 943 — 293 points above Garcia's 650. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Blackburn throws significantly more leather — a 5.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Garcia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Garcia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Blackburn over Edgar Garcia. The model gives Blackburn a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Tomasz Drwal vs Mike Ciesnolevicz

Light Heavyweight
69%
Tomasz Drwal
Drwal
3-2
Elo 1008
Submission Artist
VS
Ciesnolevicz
1-0
Elo 972

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Tomasz Drwal (3-2) taking on Mike Ciesnolevicz (1-0).

Drwal carries a modest Elo edge (1008 to 972), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Drwal throws significantly more leather — a 5.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Drwal is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Ciesnolevicz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tomasz Drwal over Mike Ciesnolevicz. We're leaning Drwal here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

53%
Frank Lester
Osipczak
2-2
Elo 971
VS
Lester
0-0
Elo 890

The Welterweight matchup features Nick Osipczak (2-2) taking on Frank Lester (0-0).

There's a real Elo separation here: Osipczak at 971 versus Lester at 890. That 82-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lester throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Lester is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Lester has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frank Lester over Nick Osipczak. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Lester at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

60%
Cameron Dollar
Dent
1-2
Elo 956
VS
Dollar
0-0
Elo 839

The Lightweight matchup features Jason Dent (1-2) taking on Cameron Dollar (0-0).

There's a real Elo separation here: Dent at 956 versus Dollar at 839. That 116-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dent throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Dollar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cameron Dollar over Jason Dent. The model gives Dollar a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.