UFC 43: Meltdown: Predictions & Analysis
UFC 43: Meltdown lands on Friday, June 6, 2003 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 8 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randy Couture vs Chuck LiddellLight Heavyweight | Chuck Liddell | Lean | 61% |
| Kimo Leopoldo vs David AbbottHeavyweight | Kimo Leopoldo | Toss-up | 53% |
| Vitor Belfort vs Marvin EastmanLight Heavyweight | Vitor Belfort | Lean | 64% |
| Vernon White vs Ian FreemanHeavyweight | Ian Freeman | Confident | 68% |
| Frank Mir vs Wes SimsHeavyweight | Frank Mir | Confident | 66% |
| Yves Edwards vs Eddie RuizLightweight | Yves Edwards | Strong | 84% |
| Falaniko Vitale vs Matt LindlandMiddleweight | Matt Lindland | Strong | 77% |
| Pedro Rizzo vs Tra TelligmanHeavyweight | Pedro Rizzo | Strong | 76% |
Fight-by-Fight Breakdown
Randy Couture vs Chuck Liddell
The Light Heavyweight matchup features Randy Couture (16-7) taking on Chuck Liddell (16-6).
Couture is rated at 1248 — 212 points above Liddell's 1035. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Couture rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.
Stylistically this is Couture's wrestler game against Liddell's striker approach. Couture looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Liddell brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Liddell throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Couture is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.3 more per 15 minutes. Liddell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Chuck Liddell over Randy Couture. The model gives Liddell a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.
Kimo Leopoldo vs David Abbott
The Heavyweight matchup features Kimo Leopoldo (2-3) taking on David Abbott (8-9).
Leopoldo is rated at 1039 — 263 points above Abbott's 777. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Both fighters land in our "Submission Artist" archetype — ground specialists who hunt for finishes off their back or from top position. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Abbott throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Abbott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Leopoldo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Kimo Leopoldo over David Abbott. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Leopoldo at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Vitor Belfort vs Marvin Eastman
The Light Heavyweight matchup features Vitor Belfort (15-9) taking on Marvin Eastman (1-3). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Belfort.
Belfort is rated at 1255 — 446 points above Eastman's 809. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Belfort throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Belfort is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Eastman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Vitor Belfort over Marvin Eastman. The model gives Belfort a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.
Vernon White vs Ian Freeman
The Heavyweight matchup features Vernon White (0-0-1) taking on Ian Freeman (3-2).
Freeman carries a modest Elo edge (1054 to 992), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
A few statistical edges stand out. Freeman throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Freeman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. White has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Ian Freeman over Vernon White. We're leaning Freeman here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
The Heavyweight matchup features Frank Mir (16-10) taking on Wes Sims (0-2).
Mir is rated at 1252 — 429 points above Sims's 823. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Mir throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Mir is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Sims has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Frank Mir over Wes Sims. We're leaning Mir here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Yves Edwards vs Eddie Ruiz
The Lightweight matchup features Yves Edwards (10-9) taking on Eddie Ruiz (0-0).
There's a real Elo separation here: Ruiz at 945 versus Edwards at 818. That 128-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
A few statistical edges stand out. Edwards throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Edwards is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Ruiz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Yves Edwards over Eddie Ruiz. The model is firm on this one: Edwards at 84%.
Falaniko Vitale vs Matt Lindland
The Middleweight matchup features Falaniko Vitale (1-0) taking on Matt Lindland (8-3).
Lindland is rated at 1239 — 179 points above Vitale's 1059. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Lindland throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Lindland is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.8 more per 15 minutes. Vitale has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Matt Lindland over Falaniko Vitale. The model is firm on this one: Lindland at 77%.
Pedro Rizzo vs Tra Telligman
The Heavyweight matchup features Pedro Rizzo (8-5) taking on Tra Telligman (1-3).
Rizzo is rated at 1268 — 420 points above Telligman's 848. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Rizzo throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Rizzo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Telligman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Pedro Rizzo over Tra Telligman. The model is firm on this one: Rizzo at 76%.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.