UFC Fight Night: Luque vs. Dos Anjos: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 12, 2023·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Luque vs. Dos Anjos lands on Saturday, August 12, 2023 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Vicente Luque vs Rafael Dos AnjosWelterweightRafael Dos AnjosToss-up55%
Cub Swanson vs Hakeem DawoduFeatherweightHakeem DawoduStrong77%
Khalil Rountree Jr. vs Chris DaukausLight HeavyweightChris DaukausLean60%
Iasmin Lucindo vs Polyana VianaWomen's StrawweightIasmin LucindoConfident71%
AJ Dobson vs Tafon NchukwiMiddleweightTafon NchukwiConfident66%
Josh Fremd vs Jamie PickettMiddleweightJosh FremdConfident69%
Marcus McGhee vs JP BuysBantamweightMarcus McGheeLean61%
Terrance McKinney vs Mike BreedenLightweightTerrance McKinneyStrong81%
Isaac Dulgarian vs Francis MarshallFeatherweightFrancis MarshallLean65%
Martin Buday vs Josh ParisianHeavyweightMartin BudayConfident70%
Jaqueline Amorim vs Montserrat Conejo RuizWomen's StrawweightJaqueline AmorimLean63%
Da'Mon Blackshear vs Jose JohnsonBantamweightJose JohnsonToss-up51%
Luana Santos vs Juliana MillerWomen's FlyweightLuana SantosToss-up54%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Vicente Luque vs Rafael Dos Anjos

WelterweightTitle Fight
55%
Rafael Dos Anjos
Luque
16-7
Elo 1250
All-Rounder
VS
Anjos
21-14
Elo 1282
Wrestler

The Welterweight championship matchup features Vicente Luque (16-7) taking on Rafael Dos Anjos (21-14). Luque is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Anjos carries a modest Elo edge (1282 to 1250), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Luque is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Anjos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Anjos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Luque throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Anjos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Anjos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafael Dos Anjos over Vicente Luque. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Anjos at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Cub Swanson vs Hakeem Dawodu

Featherweight
77%
Hakeem Dawodu
Swanson
14-10
Elo 1255
Striker
VS
Dawodu
6-3
Elo 1090
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Cub Swanson (14-10) taking on Hakeem Dawodu (6-3). Dawodu will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Swanson is rated at 1255 — 166 points above Dawodu's 1090. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Swanson throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Swanson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Dawodu has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Hakeem Dawodu over Cub Swanson. The model is firm on this one: Dawodu at 77%. The market implies 33% for Swanson, but our model sees only 23%. That 11-point gap favoring Dawodu is worth watching.

60%
Chris Daukaus
Jr.
10-6
Elo 1506
Striker
VS
Daukaus
4-3
Elo 1108
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Khalil Rountree Jr. (10-6) taking on Chris Daukaus (4-3).

Jr. is rated at 1506 — 398 points above Daukaus's 1108. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Daukaus throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Daukaus is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Daukaus has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Daukaus over Khalil Rountree Jr.. The model gives Daukaus a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Iasmin Lucindo vs Polyana Viana

Women's Strawweight
71%
Iasmin Lucindo
Lucindo
4-2
Elo 1309
All-Rounder
VS
Viana
4-6
Elo 868
Wrestler

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Iasmin Lucindo (4-2) taking on Polyana Viana (4-6).

Lucindo is rated at 1309 — 442 points above Viana's 868. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Lucindo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Viana is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Viana the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lucindo throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Lucindo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Lucindo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Iasmin Lucindo over Polyana Viana. We're leaning Lucindo here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Lucindo at 63% implied while our model sees 71% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

AJ Dobson vs Tafon Nchukwi

Middleweight
66%
Tafon Nchukwi
Dobson
1-2
Elo 836
VS
Nchukwi
2-3
Elo 716
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features AJ Dobson (1-2) taking on Tafon Nchukwi (2-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Dobson at 836 versus Nchukwi at 716. That 120-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nchukwi throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Dobson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Nchukwi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tafon Nchukwi over AJ Dobson. We're leaning Nchukwi here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 43% for Dobson, but our model sees only 34%. That 9-point gap favoring Nchukwi is worth watching.

Josh Fremd vs Jamie Pickett

Middleweight
69%
Josh Fremd
Fremd
2-3
Elo 894
Wrestler
VS
Pickett
2-6
Elo 673
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Josh Fremd (2-3) taking on Jamie Pickett (2-6). Pickett will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Fremd is rated at 894 — 221 points above Pickett's 673. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Fremd's wrestler game against Pickett's striker approach. Fremd looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Pickett brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pickett throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Fremd is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Pickett has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Josh Fremd over Jamie Pickett. We're leaning Fremd here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 75% for Fremd, but our model sees only 69%. That 5-point gap favoring Pickett is worth watching.

Marcus McGhee vs JP Buys

Bantamweight
61%
Marcus McGhee
McGhee
4-0
Elo 1329
VS
Buys
0-3
Elo 679

The Bantamweight matchup features Marcus McGhee (4-0) taking on JP Buys (0-3). McGhee is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

McGhee is rated at 1329 — 650 points above Buys's 679. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. McGhee rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. McGhee throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Buys is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. McGhee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marcus McGhee over JP Buys. The model gives McGhee a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

81%
Terrance McKinney
McKinney
7-4
Elo 1110
Submission Artist
VS
Breeden
0-3
Elo 972

The Lightweight matchup features Terrance McKinney (7-4) taking on Mike Breeden (0-3). McKinney will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: McKinney at 1110 versus Breeden at 972. That 138-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Breeden throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. McKinney is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. McKinney has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Terrance McKinney over Mike Breeden. The model is firm on this one: McKinney at 81%. Notably, the betting market has McKinney at 71% implied while our model sees 81% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

65%
Francis Marshall
Dulgarian
2-1
Elo 999
VS
Marshall
2-2
Elo 933

The Featherweight matchup features Isaac Dulgarian (2-1) taking on Francis Marshall (2-2).

Dulgarian carries a modest Elo edge (999 to 933), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marshall throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Marshall is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Dulgarian has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Francis Marshall over Isaac Dulgarian. The model gives Marshall a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 40% for Dulgarian, but our model sees only 35%. That 5-point gap favoring Marshall is worth watching.

70%
Martin Buday
Buday
6-1
Elo 1183
All-Rounder
VS
Parisian
2-4
Elo 772
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Martin Buday (6-1) taking on Josh Parisian (2-4).

Buday is rated at 1183 — 411 points above Parisian's 772. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Buday's all-rounder game against Parisian's striker approach. Buday is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Parisian brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Buday throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Parisian is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Buday has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Martin Buday over Josh Parisian. We're leaning Buday here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Buday at 65% implied while our model sees 70% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

63%
Jaqueline Amorim
Amorim
4-1
Elo 1177
Submission Artist
VS
Ruiz
1-3
Elo 720

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Jaqueline Amorim (4-1) taking on Montserrat Conejo Ruiz (1-3). Amorim is the bigger frame at 5'3" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Amorim is rated at 1177 — 457 points above Ruiz's 720. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Amorim rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ruiz throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Ruiz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Amorim has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jaqueline Amorim over Montserrat Conejo Ruiz. The model gives Amorim a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Jose Johnson
Blackshear
5-3-1
Elo 1216
Wrestler
VS
Johnson
1-2
Elo 862

The Bantamweight matchup features Da'Mon Blackshear (5-3-1) taking on Jose Johnson (1-2).

Blackshear is rated at 1216 — 354 points above Johnson's 862. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Blackshear rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Blackshear throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Blackshear is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jose Johnson over Da'Mon Blackshear. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Johnson at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Luana Santos vs Juliana Miller

Women's Flyweight
54%
Luana Santos
Santos
4-1
Elo 1277
Wrestler
VS
Miller
2-2
Elo 910

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Luana Santos (4-1) taking on Juliana Miller (2-2).

Santos is rated at 1277 — 367 points above Miller's 910. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miller throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Miller is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Luana Santos over Juliana Miller. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Santos at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 58% for Santos, but our model sees only 54%. That 3-point gap favoring Miller is worth watching.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC Fight Night: Luque vs. Dos Anjos Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker