UFC 275: Teixeira vs. Prochazka: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, June 11, 2022·Kallang, Singapore
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 275: Teixeira vs. Prochazka lands on Saturday, June 11, 2022 in Kallang, Singapore with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by 2 title bouts. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jiri Prochazka vs Glover TeixeiraLight HeavyweightJiri ProchazkaLean61%
Valentina Shevchenko vs Taila SantosWomen's FlyweightValentina ShevchenkoStrong86%
Zhang Weili vs Joanna JedrzejczykWomen's StrawweightJoanna JedrzejczykToss-up54%
Jake Matthews vs Andre FialhoWelterweightJake MatthewsLean60%
Jack Della Maddalena vs Ramazan EmeevWelterweightJack Della MaddalenaToss-up52%
Josh Culibao vs SeungWoo ChoiFeatherweightSeungWoo ChoiToss-up51%
Maheshate vs Steve GarciaLightweightSteve GarciaLean62%
Brendan Allen vs Jacob MalkounMiddleweightBrendan AllenConfident67%
Kyung Ho Kang vs Batgerel DanaaBantamweightKyung Ho KangToss-up50%
Silvana Gomez Juarez vs Liang NaWomen's StrawweightLiang NaToss-up53%
Joselyne Edwards vs Ramona PascualWomen's FeatherweightJoselyne EdwardsLean60%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jiri Prochazka vs Glover Teixeira

Light HeavyweightTitle Fight
61%
Jiri Prochazka
Prochazka
6-2
CH-I1919
All-Rounder
VS
Teixeira
16-7
CH-III1677
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Light Heavyweight championship matchup features Jiri Prochazka (6-2) taking on Glover Teixeira (16-7). Prochazka will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Prochazka is rated at 1919 — 242 points above Teixeira's 1677. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Prochazka is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Teixeira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Teixeira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Prochazka throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Teixeira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Teixeira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jiri Prochazka over Glover Teixeira. The model gives Prochazka a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 66% for Prochazka, but our model sees only 61%. That 5-point gap favoring Teixeira is worth watching.

Valentina Shevchenko vs Taila Santos

Women's FlyweightTitle Fight
86%
Valentina Shevchenko
Shevchenko
15-3-1
CH-I1807
All-Rounder
VS
Santos
4-3
CO-II1350
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Women's Flyweight championship matchup features Valentina Shevchenko (15-3-1) taking on Taila Santos (4-3).

Shevchenko is rated at 1807 — 456 points above Santos's 1350. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Shevchenko is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Santos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Santos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Shevchenko is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Shevchenko has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Valentina Shevchenko over Taila Santos. The model is firm on this one: Shevchenko at 86%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Zhang Weili vs Joanna Jedrzejczyk

Women's Strawweight
54%
Joanna Jedrzejczyk
Weili
10-3
CH-II1741
Wrestler
VS
Jedrzejczyk
10-5
CO-II1348
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Zhang Weili (10-3) taking on Joanna Jedrzejczyk (10-5). Jedrzejczyk is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Weili is rated at 1741 — 393 points above Jedrzejczyk's 1348. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Weili rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jedrzejczyk throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Weili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Jedrzejczyk has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joanna Jedrzejczyk over Zhang Weili. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jedrzejczyk at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 60% for Weili, but our model sees only 46%. That 14-point gap favoring Jedrzejczyk is worth watching.

60%
Jake Matthews
Matthews
15-8
CO-II1398
All-Rounder
VS
Fialho
2-5
MC-III932
Striker
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Welterweight matchup features Jake Matthews (15-8) taking on Andre Fialho (2-5).

Matthews is rated at 1398 — 466 points above Fialho's 932. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Matthews rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Matthews's all-rounder game against Fialho's striker approach. Matthews is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Fialho brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fialho throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Matthews is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Matthews has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jake Matthews over Andre Fialho. The model gives Matthews a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Matthews at 50% implied while our model sees 60% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Jack Della Maddalena
Maddalena
8-1
CH-I1939
All-Rounder
VS
Emeev
5-3
RK-II1121
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Welterweight matchup features Jack Della Maddalena (8-1) taking on Ramazan Emeev (5-3). Emeev will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Maddalena is rated at 1939 — 818 points above Emeev's 1121. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Maddalena is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Emeev looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Emeev the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maddalena throws significantly more leather — a 11.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Emeev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Emeev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jack Della Maddalena over Ramazan Emeev. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Maddalena at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 62% for Maddalena, but our model sees only 52%. That 10-point gap favoring Emeev is worth watching.

Josh Culibao vs SeungWoo Choi

Featherweight
51%
SeungWoo Choi
Culibao
3-4-1
RK-III1036
All-Rounder
VS
Choi
4-7
PR-III828
Striker
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Featherweight matchup features Josh Culibao (3-4-1) taking on SeungWoo Choi (4-7).

Culibao is rated at 1036 — 208 points above Choi's 828. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Culibao's all-rounder game against Choi's striker approach. Culibao is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Choi brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Choi throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Choi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Culibao has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: SeungWoo Choi over Josh Culibao. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Choi at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Maheshate vs Steve Garcia

Lightweight
62%
Steve Garcia
Maheshate
2-4
PR-III815
Striker
VS
Garcia
8-2
CH-III1656
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Lightweight matchup features Maheshate (2-4) taking on Steve Garcia (8-2). Garcia will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Garcia is rated at 1656 — 841 points above Maheshate's 815. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Garcia has won 7 straight.

The style clash matters here: Maheshate brings a versatile approach, while Garcia is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Garcia the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Garcia throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Garcia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Maheshate has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Steve Garcia over Maheshate. The model gives Garcia a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

67%
Brendan Allen
Allen
14-4
CH-II1783
Wrestler
VS
Malkoun
5-3
CO-II1370
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Middleweight matchup features Brendan Allen (14-4) taking on Jacob Malkoun (5-3). Allen is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Allen is rated at 1783 — 413 points above Malkoun's 1370. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Allen is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Malkoun looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Malkoun the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Allen throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Malkoun is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.2 more per 15 minutes. Allen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brendan Allen over Jacob Malkoun. We're leaning Allen here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 72% for Allen, but our model sees only 67%. That 5-point gap favoring Malkoun is worth watching.

50%
Kyung Ho Kang
Kang
8-5
RK-I1142
All-Rounder
VS
Danaa
3-4
MC-III924
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Kyung Ho Kang (8-5) taking on Batgerel Danaa (3-4). Kang is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Kang is rated at 1142 — 218 points above Danaa's 924. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Kang's wrestler game against Danaa's striker approach. Kang looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Danaa brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Danaa throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Kang is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Kang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kyung Ho Kang over Batgerel Danaa. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Kang at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Silvana Gomez Juarez vs Liang Na

Women's Strawweight
53%
Liang Na
Juarez
1-3
UC-I789
VS
Na
0-4
UC-III436
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Silvana Gomez Juarez (1-3) taking on Liang Na (0-4). Na is the bigger frame at 5'5" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Juarez is rated at 789 — 353 points above Na's 436. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Na throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Na is far more active with takedowns, averaging 7.0 more per 15 minutes. Juarez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Liang Na over Silvana Gomez Juarez. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Na at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Joselyne Edwards vs Ramona Pascual

Women's Featherweight
60%
Joselyne Edwards
Edwards
8-4
CO-III1320
Wrestler
VS
Pascual
0-3
UC-II709
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Women's Featherweight matchup features Joselyne Edwards (8-4) taking on Ramona Pascual (0-3). Edwards will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Edwards is rated at 1320 — 611 points above Pascual's 709. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Edwards rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pascual throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Pascual is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Pascual has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joselyne Edwards over Ramona Pascual. The model gives Edwards a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.