UFC 248: Adesanya vs. Romero: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 7, 2020·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 248: Adesanya vs. Romero lands on Saturday, March 7, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by 2 title bouts. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Israel Adesanya vs Yoel RomeroMiddleweightIsrael AdesanyaStrong82%
Zhang Weili vs Joanna JedrzejczykWomen's StrawweightZhang WeiliConfident69%
Beneil Dariush vs Drakkar KloseLightweightBeneil DariushConfident66%
Neil Magny vs Li JingliangWelterweightNeil MagnyToss-up51%
Alex Oliveira vs Max GriffinWelterweightAlex OliveiraToss-up50%
Sean O'Malley vs Jose QuinonezBantamweightJose QuinonezConfident65%
Mark Madsen vs Austin HubbardLightweightMark MadsenToss-up55%
Rodolfo Vieira vs Saparbeg SafarovMiddleweightRodolfo VieiraConfident72%
Gerald Meerschaert vs Deron WinnMiddleweightGerald MeerschaertLean58%
Giga Chikadze vs Jamall EmmersFeatherweightGiga ChikadzeLean56%
Batgerel Danaa vs Guido CannettiBantamweightBatgerel DanaaLean62%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Israel Adesanya vs Yoel Romero

MiddleweightTitle Fight
82%
Israel Adesanya
Adesanya
13-4
Elo 1559
Striker
VS
Romero
9-3
Elo 1613
Striker

The Middleweight championship matchup features Israel Adesanya (13-4) taking on Yoel Romero (9-3). Adesanya is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Romero carries a modest Elo edge (1613 to 1559), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Adesanya is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Romero brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Adesanya the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Adesanya throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Romero is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Adesanya has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Israel Adesanya over Yoel Romero. The model is firm on this one: Adesanya at 82%.

Zhang Weili vs Joanna Jedrzejczyk

Women's StrawweightTitle Fight
69%
Zhang Weili
Weili
10-2
Elo 1649
Wrestler
VS
Jedrzejczyk
10-4
Elo 1192
All-Rounder

The Women's Strawweight championship matchup features Zhang Weili (10-2) taking on Joanna Jedrzejczyk (10-4). Jedrzejczyk is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Weili is rated at 1649 — 457 points above Jedrzejczyk's 1192. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Weili rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Weili looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Jedrzejczyk is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Weili the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Weili throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Weili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Weili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Zhang Weili over Joanna Jedrzejczyk. We're leaning Weili here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

66%
Beneil Dariush
Dariush
17-6-1
Elo 1437
All-Rounder
VS
Klose
9-3
Elo 1397
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Beneil Dariush (17-6-1) taking on Drakkar Klose (9-3).

Dariush carries a modest Elo edge (1437 to 1397), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Dariush's wrestler game against Klose's striker approach. Dariush looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Klose brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dariush throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Dariush is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Dariush has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Beneil Dariush over Drakkar Klose. We're leaning Dariush here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Neil Magny vs Li Jingliang

Welterweight
51%
Neil Magny
Magny
24-12
Elo 1270
Wrestler
VS
Jingliang
11-6
Elo 1270
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Neil Magny (24-12) taking on Li Jingliang (11-6). Magny is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Magny at 1270, Jingliang at 1270. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Magny's all-rounder game against Jingliang's striker approach. Magny is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Jingliang brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jingliang throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Magny is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Jingliang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Neil Magny over Li Jingliang. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Magny at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Alex Oliveira vs Max Griffin

Welterweight
50%
Alex Oliveira
Oliveira
11-9
Elo 934
All-Rounder
VS
Griffin
8-9
Elo 1152
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Alex Oliveira (11-9) taking on Max Griffin (8-9).

Griffin is rated at 1152 — 218 points above Oliveira's 934. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Griffin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex Oliveira over Max Griffin. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Oliveira at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

65%
Jose Quinonez
O'Malley
10-3
Elo 1748
Striker
VS
Quinonez
5-3
Elo 882
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Sean O'Malley (10-3) taking on Jose Quinonez (5-3). O'Malley is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

O'Malley is rated at 1748 — 865 points above Quinonez's 882. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is O'Malley's striker game against Quinonez's all-rounder approach. O'Malley brings a versatile approach, while Quinonez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. O'Malley throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Quinonez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Quinonez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jose Quinonez over Sean O'Malley. We're leaning Quinonez here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

55%
Mark Madsen
Madsen
4-1
Elo 1112
Striker
VS
Hubbard
4-7
Elo 817
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Mark Madsen (4-1) taking on Austin Hubbard (4-7).

Madsen is rated at 1112 — 295 points above Hubbard's 817. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Madsen's striker game against Hubbard's all-rounder approach. Madsen brings a versatile approach, while Hubbard is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Madsen throws significantly more leather — a 15.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Madsen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 11.0 more per 15 minutes. Madsen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Madsen over Austin Hubbard. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Madsen at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

72%
Rodolfo Vieira
Vieira
6-3
Elo 1069
Wrestler
VS
Safarov
1-2
Elo 916

The Middleweight matchup features Rodolfo Vieira (6-3) taking on Saparbeg Safarov (1-2). Safarov will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Vieira is rated at 1069 — 153 points above Safarov's 916. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Safarov throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Vieira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Vieira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rodolfo Vieira over Saparbeg Safarov. We're leaning Vieira here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Gerald Meerschaert
Meerschaert
12-12
Elo 867
Wrestler
VS
Winn
2-2
Elo 891

The Middleweight matchup features Gerald Meerschaert (12-12) taking on Deron Winn (2-2). Meerschaert is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Meerschaert at 867, Winn at 891. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Winn throws significantly more leather — a 4.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Winn is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Meerschaert has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gerald Meerschaert over Deron Winn. The model gives Meerschaert a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Giga Chikadze
Chikadze
8-3
Elo 1150
All-Rounder
VS
Emmers
4-4
Elo 1177
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Giga Chikadze (8-3) taking on Jamall Emmers (4-4).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Chikadze at 1150, Emmers at 1177. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Chikadze's all-rounder game against Emmers's striker approach. Chikadze is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Emmers brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Chikadze throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Chikadze is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Emmers has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Giga Chikadze over Jamall Emmers. The model gives Chikadze a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Batgerel Danaa
Danaa
3-3
Elo 887
Striker
VS
Cannetti
4-5
Elo 1005
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Batgerel Danaa (3-3) taking on Guido Cannetti (4-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Cannetti at 1005 versus Danaa at 887. That 118-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Danaa's striker game against Cannetti's wrestler approach. Danaa brings a versatile approach, while Cannetti looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Danaa throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Cannetti is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Danaa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Batgerel Danaa over Guido Cannetti. The model gives Danaa a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.