UFC Fight Night: Andrade vs. Zhang: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 31, 2019·Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Andrade vs. Zhang lands on Saturday, August 31, 2019 in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Zhang Weili vs Jessica AndradeWomen's StrawweightJessica AndradeLean56%
Li Jingliang vs Elizeu Zaleski dos SantosWelterweightElizeu Zaleski dos SantosStrong81%
Kai Kara-France vs Mark De La RosaFlyweightKai Kara-FranceLean58%
Song Kenan vs Derrick KrantzWelterweightSong KenanToss-up54%
Mizuki vs Wu YananWomen's FlyweightWu YananLean62%
Anthony Hernandez vs JunYong ParkMiddleweightAnthony HernandezLean57%
Sumudaerji vs Andre SoukhamthathBantamweightAndre SoukhamthathLean57%
Da Woon Jung vs Khadis IbragimovLight HeavyweightKhadis IbragimovToss-up53%
Damir Ismagulov vs Thiago MoisesLightweightDamir IsmagulovLean62%
Alatengheili vs Batgerel DanaaBantamweightBatgerel DanaaToss-up53%
Karol Rosa vs Lara ProcopioWomen's BantamweightLara ProcopioToss-up52%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Zhang Weili vs Jessica Andrade

Women's Strawweight
56%
Jessica Andrade
Weili
10-2
Elo 1649
Wrestler
VS
Andrade
17-12
Elo 1115
Knockout Artist

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Zhang Weili (10-2) taking on Jessica Andrade (17-12). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Weili.

Weili is rated at 1649 — 534 points above Andrade's 1115. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Weili rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Andrade throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Andrade is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Weili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jessica Andrade over Zhang Weili. The model gives Andrade a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

81%
Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos
Jingliang
11-6
Elo 1270
Striker
VS
Santos
11-5-1
Elo 1041
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Li Jingliang (11-6) taking on Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos (11-5-1).

Jingliang is rated at 1270 — 229 points above Santos's 1041. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Jingliang's striker game against Santos's all-rounder approach. Jingliang brings a versatile approach, while Santos is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jingliang throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Jingliang is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jingliang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos over Li Jingliang. The model is firm on this one: Santos at 81%. The market implies 29% for Jingliang, but our model sees only 19%. That 10-point gap favoring Santos is worth watching.

58%
Kai Kara-France
Kara-France
8-4
Elo 1351
Striker
VS
Rosa
2-4
Elo 736
All-Rounder

The Flyweight matchup features Kai Kara-France (8-4) taking on Mark De La Rosa (2-4). Kara-France will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Kara-France is rated at 1351 — 615 points above Rosa's 736. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Kara-France's striker game against Rosa's all-rounder approach. Kara-France brings a versatile approach, while Rosa is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kara-France throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Kara-France is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Kara-France has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kai Kara-France over Mark De La Rosa. The model gives Kara-France a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Song Kenan vs Derrick Krantz

Welterweight
54%
Song Kenan
Kenan
6-4
Elo 1007
Striker
VS
Krantz
0-1
Elo 918

The Welterweight matchup features Song Kenan (6-4) taking on Derrick Krantz (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Kenan at 1007 versus Krantz at 918. That 88-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kenan throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Krantz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.9 more per 15 minutes. Kenan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Song Kenan over Derrick Krantz. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Kenan at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Mizuki vs Wu Yanan

Women's Flyweight
62%
Wu Yanan
Mizuki
2-1
Elo 1185
VS
Yanan
1-4
Elo 703
Wrestler

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Mizuki (2-1) taking on Wu Yanan (1-4). There's a 5-inch height gap favoring Yanan.

Mizuki is rated at 1185 — 482 points above Yanan's 703. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yanan throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Yanan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Mizuki has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Wu Yanan over Mizuki. The model gives Yanan a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

57%
Anthony Hernandez
Hernandez
9-2
Elo 1602
Wrestler
VS
Park
9-3
Elo 1235
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Anthony Hernandez (9-2) taking on JunYong Park (9-3). Hernandez is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Hernandez is rated at 1602 — 368 points above Park's 1235. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Hernandez rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hernandez throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Park is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Park has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Hernandez over JunYong Park. The model gives Hernandez a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

57%
Andre Soukhamthath
Sumudaerji
4-4
Elo 1054
All-Rounder
VS
Soukhamthath
2-4
Elo 887
Knockout Artist

The Bantamweight matchup features Sumudaerji (4-4) taking on Andre Soukhamthath (2-4).

Sumudaerji is rated at 1054 — 167 points above Soukhamthath's 887. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Sumudaerji's all-rounder game against Soukhamthath's knockout artist approach. Sumudaerji is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Soukhamthath is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Soukhamthath throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Soukhamthath is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Soukhamthath has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Andre Soukhamthath over Sumudaerji. The model gives Soukhamthath a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Da Woon Jung vs Khadis Ibragimov

Light Heavyweight
53%
Khadis Ibragimov
Jung
4-3-1
Elo 979
Wrestler
VS
Ibragimov
0-3
Elo 740

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Da Woon Jung (4-3-1) taking on Khadis Ibragimov (0-3).

Jung is rated at 979 — 239 points above Ibragimov's 740. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ibragimov throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Ibragimov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ibragimov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Khadis Ibragimov over Da Woon Jung. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Ibragimov at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

62%
Damir Ismagulov
Ismagulov
5-1
Elo 1202
Striker
VS
Moises
8-6
Elo 1124
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Damir Ismagulov (5-1) taking on Thiago Moises (8-6). Ismagulov will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ismagulov carries a modest Elo edge (1202 to 1124), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Ismagulov's striker game against Moises's wrestler approach. Ismagulov brings a versatile approach, while Moises looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ismagulov throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Ismagulov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Ismagulov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Damir Ismagulov over Thiago Moises. The model gives Ismagulov a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 65% for Ismagulov, but our model sees only 62%. That 3-point gap favoring Moises is worth watching.

53%
Batgerel Danaa
Alatengheili
5-2-1
Elo 1129
Striker
VS
Danaa
3-3
Elo 887
Striker

The Bantamweight matchup features Alatengheili (5-2-1) taking on Batgerel Danaa (3-3). Danaa is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Alatengheili is rated at 1129 — 242 points above Danaa's 887. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Danaa throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Danaa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Danaa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Batgerel Danaa over Alatengheili. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Danaa at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Karol Rosa vs Lara Procopio

Women's Bantamweight
52%
Lara Procopio
Rosa
7-4
Elo 1201
Striker
VS
Procopio
1-1
Elo 951

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Karol Rosa (7-4) taking on Lara Procopio (1-1).

Rosa is rated at 1201 — 250 points above Procopio's 951. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Procopio throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Procopio is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Procopio has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Lara Procopio over Karol Rosa. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Procopio at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC Fight Night: Andrade vs. Zhang Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker