UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Saffiedine: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 4, 2014·Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Saffiedine lands on Saturday, October 4, 2014 in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada with 12 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Rory MacDonald vs Tarec SaffiedineWelterweightRory MacDonaldConfident74%
Raphael Assuncao vs Bryan CarawayBantamweightBryan CarawayLean56%
Chad Laprise vs Yosdenis CedenoLightweightChad LapriseConfident69%
Elias Theodorou vs Bruno SantosMiddleweightElias TheodorouStrong81%
Nordine Taleb vs Li JingliangWelterweightNordine TalebToss-up53%
Mitch Gagnon vs Roman SalazarBantamweightMitch GagnonConfident70%
Daron Cruickshank vs Anthony NjokuaniLightweightDaron CruickshankLean64%
Olivier Aubin-Mercier vs Jake LindseyLightweightOlivier Aubin-MercierConfident67%
Paul Felder vs Jason SaggoLightweightJason SaggoStrong75%
Chris Kelades vs Paddy HolohanFlyweightPaddy HolohanLean62%
Albert Tumenov vs Matt DwyerWelterweightAlbert TumenovToss-up53%
Pedro Munhoz vs Jerrod SandersBantamweightPedro MunhozLean63%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

74%
Rory MacDonald
MacDonald
9-3
Elo 1465
All-Rounder
VS
Saffiedine
2-3
Elo 1116
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Rory MacDonald (9-3) taking on Tarec Saffiedine (2-3). MacDonald is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

MacDonald is rated at 1465 — 349 points above Saffiedine's 1116. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Saffiedine throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. MacDonald is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. MacDonald has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rory MacDonald over Tarec Saffiedine. We're leaning MacDonald here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

56%
Bryan Caraway
Assuncao
12-6
Elo 1099
All-Rounder
VS
Caraway
6-3
Elo 1191
Wrestler

The Bantamweight matchup features Raphael Assuncao (12-6) taking on Bryan Caraway (6-3). Caraway is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Caraway at 1191 versus Assuncao at 1099. That 92-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Assuncao is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Caraway looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Caraway the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Assuncao throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Caraway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Assuncao has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Bryan Caraway over Raphael Assuncao. The model gives Caraway a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

69%
Chad Laprise
Laprise
6-3
Elo 927
Striker
VS
Cedeno
1-2
Elo 880

The Lightweight matchup features Chad Laprise (6-3) taking on Yosdenis Cedeno (1-2). Laprise is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Laprise carries a modest Elo edge (927 to 880), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Laprise throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Cedeno is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Laprise has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chad Laprise over Yosdenis Cedeno. We're leaning Laprise here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

81%
Elias Theodorou
Theodorou
8-2
Elo 1270
Striker
VS
Santos
1-1
Elo 942

The Middleweight matchup features Elias Theodorou (8-2) taking on Bruno Santos (1-1).

Theodorou is rated at 1270 — 327 points above Santos's 942. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Theodorou rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Theodorou throws significantly more leather — a 6.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Theodorou is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Theodorou has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Elias Theodorou over Bruno Santos. The model is firm on this one: Theodorou at 81%.

53%
Nordine Taleb
Taleb
7-4
Elo 976
Striker
VS
Jingliang
11-6
Elo 1270
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Nordine Taleb (7-4) taking on Li Jingliang (11-6). Taleb will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jingliang is rated at 1270 — 295 points above Taleb's 976. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jingliang throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Taleb is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Taleb has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nordine Taleb over Li Jingliang. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Taleb at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

70%
Mitch Gagnon
Gagnon
4-3
Elo 955
Wrestler
VS
Salazar
0-1
Elo 829

The Bantamweight matchup features Mitch Gagnon (4-3) taking on Roman Salazar (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Gagnon at 955 versus Salazar at 829. That 125-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gagnon throws significantly more leather — a 3.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Gagnon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Salazar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mitch Gagnon over Roman Salazar. We're leaning Gagnon here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

64%
Daron Cruickshank
Cruickshank
6-5
Elo 879
Wrestler
VS
Njokuani
3-4
Elo 972
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Daron Cruickshank (6-5) taking on Anthony Njokuani (3-4). Njokuani is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Njokuani at 972 versus Cruickshank at 879. That 92-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Cruickshank's knockout artist game against Njokuani's all-rounder approach. Cruickshank is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Njokuani is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Njokuani throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Cruickshank is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Cruickshank has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daron Cruickshank over Anthony Njokuani. The model gives Cruickshank a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

67%
Olivier Aubin-Mercier
Aubin-Mercier
7-4
Elo 1070
Wrestler
VS
Lindsey
0-2
Elo 724

The Lightweight matchup features Olivier Aubin-Mercier (7-4) taking on Jake Lindsey (0-2).

Aubin-Mercier is rated at 1070 — 346 points above Lindsey's 724. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lindsey throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Aubin-Mercier is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Aubin-Mercier has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Olivier Aubin-Mercier over Jake Lindsey. We're leaning Aubin-Mercier here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Paul Felder vs Jason Saggo

Lightweight
75%
Jason Saggo
Felder
9-5
Elo 1363
All-Rounder
VS
Saggo
3-2
Elo 1013
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Paul Felder (9-5) taking on Jason Saggo (3-2).

Felder is rated at 1363 — 350 points above Saggo's 1013. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Felder's all-rounder game against Saggo's striker approach. Felder is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Saggo brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Saggo throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Saggo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.1 more per 15 minutes. Felder has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jason Saggo over Paul Felder. The model is firm on this one: Saggo at 75%.

62%
Paddy Holohan
Kelades
2-1
Elo 976
VS
Holohan
3-1
Elo 1041

The Flyweight matchup features Chris Kelades (2-1) taking on Paddy Holohan (3-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Holohan.

Holohan carries a modest Elo edge (1041 to 976), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Holohan throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Holohan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Kelades has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Paddy Holohan over Chris Kelades. The model gives Holohan a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Albert Tumenov vs Matt Dwyer

Welterweight
53%
Albert Tumenov
Tumenov
5-2
Elo 1109
Striker
VS
Dwyer
1-2
Elo 901

The Welterweight matchup features Albert Tumenov (5-2) taking on Matt Dwyer (1-2). Dwyer is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Tumenov is rated at 1109 — 209 points above Dwyer's 901. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Tumenov throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Tumenov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Dwyer has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Albert Tumenov over Matt Dwyer. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Tumenov at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

63%
Pedro Munhoz
Munhoz
10-9
Elo 1211
All-Rounder
VS
Sanders
1-1
Elo 908

The Bantamweight matchup features Pedro Munhoz (10-9) taking on Jerrod Sanders (1-1). Sanders is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Munhoz is rated at 1211 — 303 points above Sanders's 908. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Munhoz throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Munhoz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Munhoz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Pedro Munhoz over Jerrod Sanders. The model gives Munhoz a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Saffiedine Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker