UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Albazi: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, November 2, 2024·Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Albazi lands on Saturday, November 2, 2024 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by 2 title bouts. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Brandon Moreno vs Amir AlbaziFlyweightBrandon MorenoLean63%
Erin Blanchfield vs Rose NamajunasWomen's FlyweightErin BlanchfieldToss-up53%
Brendson Ribeiro vs Caio MachadoLight HeavyweightCaio MachadoLean61%
Jasmine Jasudavicius vs Ariane da SilvaWomen's FlyweightJasmine JasudaviciusConfident65%
Dustin Stoltzfus vs Marc-Andre BarriaultMiddleweightMarc-Andre BarriaultLean62%
Mike Malott vs Trevin GilesWelterweightMike MalottConfident70%
Aiemann Zahabi vs Pedro MunhozBantamweightAiemann ZahabiConfident70%
Charles Jourdain vs Victor HenryBantamweightVictor HenryToss-up54%
Youssef Zalal vs Jack ShoreFeatherweightJack ShoreLean58%
Alexandr Romanov vs Rodrigo NascimentoHeavyweightAlexandr RomanovToss-up54%
Serhiy Sidey vs Garrett ArmfieldBantamweightGarrett ArmfieldLean56%
Cody Gibson vs Chad AnheligerBantamweightCody GibsonLean62%
Jamey-Lyn Horth vs Ivana PetrovicWomen's FlyweightIvana PetrovicLean56%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Brandon Moreno vs Amir Albazi

FlyweightTitle Fight
63%
Brandon Moreno
Moreno
11-7-2
CO-II1417
All-Rounder
VS
Albazi
5-2
CO-II1342
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 70%
Under 30%Over 70%

The Flyweight championship matchup features Brandon Moreno (11-7-2) taking on Amir Albazi (5-2). Moreno is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Moreno carries a modest Elo edge (1417 to 1342), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Moreno is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Albazi looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Albazi the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moreno throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Albazi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Albazi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brandon Moreno over Amir Albazi. The model gives Moreno a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Erin Blanchfield vs Rose Namajunas

Women's FlyweightTitle Fight
53%
Erin Blanchfield
Blanchfield
8-1
CH-II1727
All-Rounder
VS
Namajunas
12-7
CO-I1542
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 72%
Under 28%Over 72%

The Women's Flyweight championship matchup features Erin Blanchfield (8-1) taking on Rose Namajunas (12-7).

Blanchfield is rated at 1727 — 185 points above Namajunas's 1542. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Blanchfield looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Namajunas is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Blanchfield the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Blanchfield throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Namajunas is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Namajunas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Erin Blanchfield over Rose Namajunas. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Blanchfield at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 58% for Blanchfield, but our model sees only 53%. That 5-point gap favoring Namajunas is worth watching.

Brendson Ribeiro vs Caio Machado

Light Heavyweight
61%
Caio Machado
Ribeiro
2-5
MC-III901
Wrestler
VS
Machado
0-3
UC-I736
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brendson Ribeiro (2-5) taking on Caio Machado (0-3). Ribeiro will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ribeiro is rated at 901 — 165 points above Machado's 736. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Machado throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Ribeiro is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Machado has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Caio Machado over Brendson Ribeiro. The model gives Machado a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

65%
Jasmine Jasudavicius
Jasudavicius
8-3
CO-II1427
Wrestler
VS
Silva
6-8
RK-II1091
Submission Artist
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Jasmine Jasudavicius (8-3) taking on Ariane da Silva (6-8).

Jasudavicius is rated at 1427 — 337 points above Silva's 1091. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Jasudavicius looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Silva is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 55% win rate against submission artists, giving Jasudavicius the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Jasudavicius is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jasmine Jasudavicius over Ariane da Silva. We're leaning Jasudavicius here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

62%
Marc-Andre Barriault
Stoltzfus
3-7
RK-II1071
Submission Artist
VS
Barriault
6-10
RK-III1051
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Middleweight matchup features Dustin Stoltzfus (3-7) taking on Marc-Andre Barriault (6-10).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Stoltzfus at 1071, Barriault at 1051. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Stoltzfus looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Barriault is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Stoltzfus the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barriault throws significantly more leather — a 3.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Stoltzfus is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.9 more per 15 minutes. Stoltzfus has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marc-Andre Barriault over Dustin Stoltzfus. The model gives Barriault a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Stoltzfus at 31% implied while our model sees 38% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

Mike Malott vs Trevin Giles

Welterweight
70%
Mike Malott
Malott
6-1
CO-I1498
All-Rounder
VS
Giles
7-7
MC-III929
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Welterweight matchup features Mike Malott (6-1) taking on Trevin Giles (7-7).

Malott is rated at 1498 — 569 points above Giles's 929. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Malott rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Giles throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Malott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Giles has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mike Malott over Trevin Giles. We're leaning Malott here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 75% for Malott, but our model sees only 70%. That 6-point gap favoring Giles is worth watching.

70%
Aiemann Zahabi
Zahabi
8-2
CH-III1673
Striker
VS
Munhoz
10-10
CO-II1369
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Bantamweight matchup features Aiemann Zahabi (8-2) taking on Pedro Munhoz (10-10). Zahabi is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Zahabi is rated at 1673 — 303 points above Munhoz's 1369. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Zahabi rides a 7-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Zahabi's striker game against Munhoz's all-rounder approach. Zahabi brings a versatile approach, while Munhoz is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Munhoz throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Zahabi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Zahabi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aiemann Zahabi over Pedro Munhoz. We're leaning Zahabi here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

54%
Victor Henry
Jourdain
8-7-1
CO-II1344
Wrestler
VS
Henry
4-2
CO-III1242
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Bantamweight matchup features Charles Jourdain (8-7-1) taking on Victor Henry (4-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Jourdain at 1344 versus Henry at 1242. That 103-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Henry throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Jourdain is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Jourdain has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Victor Henry over Charles Jourdain. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Henry at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Youssef Zalal vs Jack Shore

Featherweight
58%
Jack Shore
Zalal
8-3-1
CO-I1551
Wrestler
VS
Shore
6-3
RK-II1130
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Featherweight matchup features Youssef Zalal (8-3-1) taking on Jack Shore (6-3).

Zalal is rated at 1551 — 421 points above Shore's 1130. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Zalal rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Zalal looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Shore is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Zalal the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Shore throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Zalal is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Zalal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jack Shore over Youssef Zalal. The model gives Shore a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

54%
Alexandr Romanov
Romanov
7-3
CO-II1429
Wrestler
VS
Nascimento
4-3
CO-III1213
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Heavyweight matchup features Alexandr Romanov (7-3) taking on Rodrigo Nascimento (4-3). Nascimento will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Romanov is rated at 1429 — 216 points above Nascimento's 1213. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Romanov looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Nascimento is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Romanov the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nascimento throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Romanov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Romanov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexandr Romanov over Rodrigo Nascimento. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Romanov at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
Garrett Armfield
Sidey
2-1
CO-III1206
VS
Armfield
2-3
MC-III926
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Bantamweight matchup features Serhiy Sidey (2-1) taking on Garrett Armfield (2-3). Sidey is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Sidey is rated at 1206 — 280 points above Armfield's 926. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Armfield throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Armfield is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Sidey has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Garrett Armfield over Serhiy Sidey. The model gives Armfield a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Cody Gibson
Gibson
3-7
PR-II862
Wrestler
VS
Anheliger
2-3
PR-I885
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Cody Gibson (3-7) taking on Chad Anheliger (2-3). Gibson is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Gibson at 862, Anheliger at 885. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gibson throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Anheliger is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Gibson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cody Gibson over Chad Anheliger. The model gives Gibson a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Jamey-Lyn Horth vs Ivana Petrovic

Women's Flyweight
56%
Ivana Petrovic
Horth
4-2
RK-I1191
All-Rounder
VS
Petrovic
1-3
UC-II682
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Jamey-Lyn Horth (4-2) taking on Ivana Petrovic (1-3). Petrovic will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Horth is rated at 1191 — 510 points above Petrovic's 682. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Horth throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Petrovic is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.3 more per 15 minutes. Horth has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ivana Petrovic over Jamey-Lyn Horth. The model gives Petrovic a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.