UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Pereira: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 19, 2024·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Pereira lands on Saturday, October 19, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Anthony Hernandez vs Michel PereiraMiddleweightAnthony HernandezToss-up50%
Rob Font vs Kyler PhillipsBantamweightKyler PhillipsConfident67%
Charles Johnson vs SumudaerjiFlyweightCharles JohnsonToss-up50%
Cameron Smotherman vs Jake HadleyBantamweightJake HadleyLean60%
Darren Elkins vs Daniel PinedaFeatherweightDarren ElkinsConfident74%
Asu Almabayev vs Matheus NicolauFlyweightAsu AlmabayevConfident66%
Jean Matsumoto vs Brad KatonaBantamweightJean MatsumotoStrong78%
Joselyne Edwards vs Tamires VidalWomen's BantamweightJoselyne EdwardsToss-up51%
Elise Reed vs Jessica PenneWomen's StrawweightElise ReedLean65%
Melissa Martinez vs Alice ArdeleanWomen's StrawweightMelissa MartinezToss-up52%
Austen Lane vs Robelis DespaigneHeavyweightRobelis DespaigneLean60%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Anthony Hernandez vs Michel Pereira

MiddleweightTitle Fight
50%
Anthony Hernandez
Hernandez
9-2
Elo 1602
Wrestler
VS
Pereira
9-5
Elo 1113
Knockout Artist

The Middleweight championship matchup features Anthony Hernandez (9-2) taking on Michel Pereira (9-5).

Hernandez is rated at 1602 — 490 points above Pereira's 1113. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Hernandez rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Hernandez is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Pereira is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Hernandez the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pereira throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Hernandez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.6 more per 15 minutes. Pereira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Hernandez over Michel Pereira. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hernandez at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Rob Font vs Kyler Phillips

Bantamweight
67%
Kyler Phillips
Font
12-7
Elo 1361
All-Rounder
VS
Phillips
6-2
Elo 1238
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Rob Font (12-7) taking on Kyler Phillips (6-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Font at 1361 versus Phillips at 1238. That 123-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Phillips throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Phillips is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Phillips has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kyler Phillips over Rob Font. We're leaning Phillips here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

50%
Charles Johnson
Johnson
7-5
Elo 1097
Striker
VS
Sumudaerji
4-4
Elo 1054
All-Rounder

The Flyweight matchup features Charles Johnson (7-5) taking on Sumudaerji (4-4).

Johnson carries a modest Elo edge (1097 to 1054), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Johnson's all-rounder game against Sumudaerji's striker approach. Johnson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Sumudaerji brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Sumudaerji has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Charles Johnson over Sumudaerji. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Johnson at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

60%
Jake Hadley
Smotherman
1-1
Elo 967
VS
Hadley
3-3
Elo 967
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Cameron Smotherman (1-1) taking on Jake Hadley (3-3).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Smotherman at 967, Hadley at 967. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hadley throws significantly more leather — a 4.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Hadley is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Smotherman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jake Hadley over Cameron Smotherman. The model gives Hadley a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

74%
Darren Elkins
Elkins
19-10
Elo 1113
Wrestler
VS
Pineda
5-7
Elo 979
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Darren Elkins (19-10) taking on Daniel Pineda (5-7). Elkins is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Elkins at 1113 versus Pineda at 979. That 133-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Elkins throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Elkins is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Elkins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Darren Elkins over Daniel Pineda. We're leaning Elkins here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

66%
Asu Almabayev
Almabayev
5-1
Elo 1349
Wrestler
VS
Nicolau
7-3
Elo 1033
Knockout Artist

The Flyweight matchup features Asu Almabayev (5-1) taking on Matheus Nicolau (7-3).

Almabayev is rated at 1349 — 315 points above Nicolau's 1033. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Almabayev's wrestler game against Nicolau's knockout artist approach. Almabayev looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Nicolau is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nicolau throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Almabayev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.0 more per 15 minutes. Nicolau has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Asu Almabayev over Matheus Nicolau. We're leaning Almabayev here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

78%
Jean Matsumoto
Matsumoto
3-1
Elo 1200
VS
Katona
4-4
Elo 838
Striker

The Bantamweight matchup features Jean Matsumoto (3-1) taking on Brad Katona (4-4). Matsumoto will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Matsumoto is rated at 1200 — 361 points above Katona's 838. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Katona throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Matsumoto is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Matsumoto has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jean Matsumoto over Brad Katona. The model is firm on this one: Matsumoto at 78%.

Joselyne Edwards vs Tamires Vidal

Women's Bantamweight
51%
Joselyne Edwards
Edwards
7-4
Elo 1320
Wrestler
VS
Vidal
1-2
Elo 784

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Joselyne Edwards (7-4) taking on Tamires Vidal (1-2). Edwards is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Edwards is rated at 1320 — 536 points above Vidal's 784. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Edwards rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edwards throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Edwards is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Vidal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joselyne Edwards over Tamires Vidal. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Edwards at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Elise Reed vs Jessica Penne

Women's Strawweight
65%
Elise Reed
Reed
4-4
Elo 933
Striker
VS
Penne
3-5
Elo 803
All-Rounder

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Elise Reed (4-4) taking on Jessica Penne (3-5). Penne is the bigger frame at 5'5" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Reed at 933 versus Penne at 803. That 130-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Reed's striker game against Penne's all-rounder approach. Reed brings a versatile approach, while Penne is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Penne throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Penne is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Penne has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Elise Reed over Jessica Penne. The model gives Reed a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

Melissa Martinez vs Alice Ardelean

Women's Strawweight
52%
Melissa Martinez
Martinez
1-1
Elo 885
VS
Ardelean
1-2
Elo 968

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Melissa Martinez (1-1) taking on Alice Ardelean (1-2). Martinez will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Ardelean at 968 versus Martinez at 885. That 82-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ardelean throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Ardelean is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Ardelean has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Melissa Martinez over Alice Ardelean. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Martinez at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

60%
Robelis Despaigne
Lane
1-3
Elo 783
VS
Despaigne
1-1
Elo 884

The Heavyweight matchup features Austen Lane (1-3) taking on Robelis Despaigne (1-1). Despaigne will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Despaigne at 884 versus Lane at 783. That 100-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lane throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Lane is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Despaigne has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Robelis Despaigne over Austen Lane. The model gives Despaigne a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Pereira Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker