The Ultimate Fighter: Heavyweights Finale: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, December 5, 2009·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

The Ultimate Fighter: Heavyweights Finale lands on Saturday, December 5, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 10 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Roy Nelson vs Brendan SchaubHeavyweightBrendan SchaubConfident65%
Matt Hamill vs Jon JonesLight HeavyweightJon JonesStrong84%
Kevin Ferguson vs Houston AlexanderCatch WeightKevin FergusonConfident70%
Frankie Edgar vs Matt VeachLightweightFrankie EdgarStrong87%
Matt Mitrione vs Marcus JonesHeavyweightMatt MitrioneToss-up53%
James McSweeney vs Darrill SchoonoverHeavyweightDarrill SchoonoverLean61%
Jon Madsen vs Justin WrenHeavyweightJustin WrenLean61%
Brian Stann vs Rodney WallaceLight HeavyweightBrian StannLean59%
John Howard vs Dennis HallmanWelterweightJohn HowardStrong83%
Mark Bocek vs Joe BrammerLightweightMark BocekConfident74%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

65%
Brendan Schaub
Nelson
9-9
Elo 1129
Striker
VS
Schaub
6-4
Elo 1154
Wrestler

The Heavyweight matchup features Roy Nelson (9-9) taking on Brendan Schaub (6-4). Schaub is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nelson at 1129, Schaub at 1154. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Nelson's striker game against Schaub's wrestler approach. Nelson brings a versatile approach, while Schaub looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Schaub throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Schaub is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Schaub has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brendan Schaub over Roy Nelson. We're leaning Schaub here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Matt Hamill vs Jon Jones

Light Heavyweight
84%
Jon Jones
Hamill
10-4
Elo 1150
Striker
VS
Jones
21-1
Elo 2161
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Matt Hamill (10-4) taking on Jon Jones (21-1). Jones is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

Jones is rated at 2161 — 1011 points above Hamill's 1150. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Jones has won 5 straight.

Stylistically this is Hamill's striker game against Jones's all-rounder approach. Hamill brings a versatile approach, while Jones is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hamill throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Jones is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Jones has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jon Jones over Matt Hamill. The model is firm on this one: Jones at 84%.

70%
Kevin Ferguson
Ferguson
1-0
Elo 947
VS
Alexander
2-3
Elo 779
Knockout Artist

The Catch Weight matchup features Kevin Ferguson (1-0) taking on Houston Alexander (2-3). Ferguson is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Ferguson is rated at 947 — 169 points above Alexander's 779. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Alexander throws significantly more leather — a 4.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Alexander is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Ferguson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kevin Ferguson over Houston Alexander. We're leaning Ferguson here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

87%
Frankie Edgar
Edgar
18-10-1
Elo 1185
All-Rounder
VS
Veach
1-1
Elo 960

The Lightweight matchup features Frankie Edgar (18-10-1) taking on Matt Veach (1-1).

Edgar is rated at 1185 — 225 points above Veach's 960. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edgar throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Edgar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Edgar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frankie Edgar over Matt Veach. The model is firm on this one: Edgar at 87%.

53%
Matt Mitrione
Mitrione
9-4
Elo 1200
Striker
VS
Jones
0-0
Elo 873

The Heavyweight matchup features Matt Mitrione (9-4) taking on Marcus Jones (0-0).

Mitrione is rated at 1200 — 327 points above Jones's 873. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jones throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Jones is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jones has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Mitrione over Marcus Jones. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Mitrione at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

61%
Darrill Schoonover
McSweeney
1-1
Elo 844
VS
Schoonover
0-0
Elo 873

The Heavyweight matchup features James McSweeney (1-1) taking on Darrill Schoonover (0-0).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — McSweeney at 844, Schoonover at 873. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Schoonover throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Schoonover is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Schoonover has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Darrill Schoonover over James McSweeney. The model gives Schoonover a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Jon Madsen vs Justin Wren

Heavyweight
61%
Justin Wren
Madsen
4-0
Elo 1098
VS
Wren
0-0
Elo 932

The Heavyweight matchup features Jon Madsen (4-0) taking on Justin Wren (0-0).

Madsen is rated at 1098 — 166 points above Wren's 932. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Madsen rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wren throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Wren is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Wren has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Justin Wren over Jon Madsen. The model gives Wren a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Brian Stann vs Rodney Wallace

Light Heavyweight
59%
Brian Stann
Stann
6-4
Elo 1077
Knockout Artist
VS
Wallace
0-2
Elo 812

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brian Stann (6-4) taking on Rodney Wallace (0-2). Stann is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Stann is rated at 1077 — 265 points above Wallace's 812. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stann throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Wallace is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Wallace has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brian Stann over Rodney Wallace. The model gives Stann a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

83%
John Howard
Howard
7-6
Elo 932
Striker
VS
Hallman
3-5
Elo 1203
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features John Howard (7-6) taking on Dennis Hallman (3-5).

Hallman is rated at 1203 — 271 points above Howard's 932. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Howard's striker game against Hallman's wrestler approach. Howard brings a versatile approach, while Hallman looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Howard throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Howard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.0 more per 15 minutes. Howard has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Howard over Dennis Hallman. The model is firm on this one: Howard at 83%.

Mark Bocek vs Joe Brammer

Lightweight
74%
Mark Bocek
Bocek
7-5
Elo 1230
Wrestler
VS
Brammer
0-1
Elo 847

The Lightweight matchup features Mark Bocek (7-5) taking on Joe Brammer (0-1).

Bocek is rated at 1230 — 383 points above Brammer's 847. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bocek throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Bocek is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Brammer has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Bocek over Joe Brammer. We're leaning Bocek here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.