UFC 37.5: As Real As It Gets: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, June 22, 2002·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 37.5: As Real As It Gets lands on Saturday, June 22, 2002 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 6 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Chuck Liddell vs Vitor BelfortLight HeavyweightChuck LiddellLean62%
Benji Radach vs Nick SerraWelterweightBenji RadachLean65%
Pete Spratt vs Zach LightWelterweightZach LightLean61%
Robbie Lawler vs Steve BergerWelterweightRobbie LawlerConfident69%
Tony Fryklund vs Rodrigo RuasMiddleweightRodrigo RuasLean57%
Yves Edwards vs Joao PieriniLightweightYves EdwardsToss-up54%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Chuck Liddell vs Vitor Belfort

Light Heavyweight
62%
Chuck Liddell
Liddell
16-7
CO-III1275
Striker
VS
Belfort
15-10
CO-II1440
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 67%
Under 67%Over 33%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Chuck Liddell (16-7) taking on Vitor Belfort (15-10). Liddell is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Belfort is rated at 1440 — 165 points above Liddell's 1275. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Liddell brings a versatile approach, while Belfort is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Belfort the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Belfort throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Belfort is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Liddell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chuck Liddell over Vitor Belfort. The model gives Liddell a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Benji Radach vs Nick Serra

Welterweight
65%
Benji Radach
Radach
1-1
RK-III1019
VS
Serra
0-1
PR-I873
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Welterweight matchup features Benji Radach (1-1) taking on Nick Serra (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Radach at 1019 versus Serra at 873. That 147-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Radach throws significantly more leather — a 22.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Serra is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Serra has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Benji Radach over Nick Serra. The model gives Radach a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

Pete Spratt vs Zach Light

Welterweight
61%
Zach Light
Spratt
3-4
PR-I893
Submission Artist
VS
Light
0-1
PR-II834
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Welterweight matchup features Pete Spratt (3-4) taking on Zach Light (0-1).

Spratt carries a modest Elo edge (893 to 834), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Light throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Light is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Light has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Zach Light over Pete Spratt. The model gives Light a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

69%
Robbie Lawler
Lawler
15-10
CO-II1418
Striker
VS
Berger
0-2
PR-III801
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Welterweight matchup features Robbie Lawler (15-10) taking on Steve Berger (0-2).

Lawler is rated at 1418 — 617 points above Berger's 801. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lawler throws significantly more leather — a 4.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Lawler is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.0 more per 15 minutes. Lawler has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Robbie Lawler over Steve Berger. We're leaning Lawler here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

57%
Rodrigo Ruas
Fryklund
2-2
RK-III1033
VS
Ruas
0-1
PR-II849
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features Tony Fryklund (2-2) taking on Rodrigo Ruas (0-1).

Fryklund is rated at 1033 — 184 points above Ruas's 849. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fryklund throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Fryklund is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.7 more per 15 minutes. Ruas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rodrigo Ruas over Tony Fryklund. The model gives Ruas a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

54%
Yves Edwards
Edwards
10-10
MC-III913
All-Rounder
VS
Pierini
0-1
UC-II707
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Lightweight matchup features Yves Edwards (10-10) taking on Joao Pierini (0-1).

Edwards is rated at 913 — 206 points above Pierini's 707. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edwards throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Edwards is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Pierini has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yves Edwards over Joao Pierini. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Edwards at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.