UFC 35: Throwdown: Predictions & Analysis

Friday, January 11, 2002·Uncasville, Connecticut, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 35: Throwdown lands on Friday, January 11, 2002 in Uncasville, Connecticut, USA with 8 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jens Pulver vs BJ PennLightweightBJ PennLean59%
Ricco Rodriguez vs Jeff MonsonHeavyweightRicco RodriguezStrong80%
Murilo Bustamante vs Dave MenneMiddleweightDave MenneToss-up51%
Chuck Liddell vs Amar SuloevLight HeavyweightChuck LiddellConfident65%
Andrei Semenov vs Ricardo AlmeidaMiddleweightRicardo AlmeidaStrong77%
Kevin Randleman vs Renato SobralLight HeavyweightKevin RandlemanToss-up50%
Gil Castillo vs Chris BrennanWelterweightChris BrennanLean56%
Eugene Jackson vs Keith RockelMiddleweightEugene JacksonLean56%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jens Pulver vs BJ Penn

LightweightTitle Fight
59%
BJ Penn
Pulver
6-1-1
Elo 1133
Submission Artist
VS
Penn
12-12-2
Elo 938
All-Rounder

The Lightweight championship matchup features Jens Pulver (6-1-1) taking on BJ Penn (12-12-2).

Pulver is rated at 1133 — 195 points above Penn's 938. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Pulver's knockout artist game against Penn's all-rounder approach. Pulver is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Penn throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Penn is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.1 more per 15 minutes. Penn has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: BJ Penn over Jens Pulver. The model gives Penn a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

80%
Ricco Rodriguez
Rodriguez
5-1
Elo 1157
Wrestler
VS
Monson
4-2
Elo 1233
All-Rounder

The Heavyweight matchup features Ricco Rodriguez (5-1) taking on Jeff Monson (4-2).

Monson carries a modest Elo edge (1233 to 1157), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm. Monson has won 3 straight.

The style clash matters here: Rodriguez looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Monson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Rodriguez the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodriguez throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Rodriguez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.9 more per 15 minutes. Rodriguez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricco Rodriguez over Jeff Monson. The model is firm on this one: Rodriguez at 80%.

51%
Dave Menne
Bustamante
2-1
Elo 1363
VS
Menne
2-3
Elo 814
Submission Artist

The Middleweight matchup features Murilo Bustamante (2-1) taking on Dave Menne (2-3).

Bustamante is rated at 1363 — 550 points above Menne's 814. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Menne throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Bustamante is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.0 more per 15 minutes. Bustamante has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dave Menne over Murilo Bustamante. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Menne at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Chuck Liddell vs Amar Suloev

Light Heavyweight
65%
Chuck Liddell
Liddell
16-6
Elo 1035
Striker
VS
Suloev
0-1
Elo 860

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Chuck Liddell (16-6) taking on Amar Suloev (0-1).

Liddell is rated at 1035 — 176 points above Suloev's 860. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Liddell throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Suloev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Suloev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chuck Liddell over Amar Suloev. We're leaning Liddell here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

77%
Ricardo Almeida
Semenov
1-0
Elo 979
VS
Almeida
6-4
Elo 1189
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Andrei Semenov (1-0) taking on Ricardo Almeida (6-4).

Almeida is rated at 1189 — 209 points above Semenov's 979. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Almeida throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Almeida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Semenov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricardo Almeida over Andrei Semenov. The model is firm on this one: Almeida at 77%.

Kevin Randleman vs Renato Sobral

Light Heavyweight
50%
Kevin Randleman
Randleman
3-3
Elo 1189
Wrestler
VS
Sobral
5-4
Elo 1190
Submission Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Kevin Randleman (3-3) taking on Renato Sobral (5-4).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Randleman at 1189, Sobral at 1190. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Randleman looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Sobral is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Randleman the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Randleman throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Sobral is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Sobral has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kevin Randleman over Renato Sobral. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Randleman at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
Chris Brennan
Castillo
1-1
Elo 1000
VS
Brennan
1-1
Elo 925

The Welterweight matchup features Gil Castillo (1-1) taking on Chris Brennan (1-1).

Castillo carries a modest Elo edge (1000 to 925), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Castillo throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Castillo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Brennan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Brennan over Gil Castillo. The model gives Brennan a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Eugene Jackson
Jackson
3-3
Elo 882
Wrestler
VS
Rockel
0-1
Elo 1004

The Middleweight matchup features Eugene Jackson (3-3) taking on Keith Rockel (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Rockel at 1004 versus Jackson at 882. That 122-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jackson throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Jackson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Rockel has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eugene Jackson over Keith Rockel. The model gives Jackson a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.