UFC 25: Ultimate Japan 3: Predictions & Analysis

Friday, April 14, 2000·Tokyo, Japan
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 25: Ultimate Japan 3 lands on Friday, April 14, 2000 in Tokyo, Japan with 6 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Tito Ortiz vs Wanderlei SilvaMiddleweightTito OrtizStrong82%
Murilo Bustamante vs Yoji AnjoMiddleweightYoji AnjoLean60%
Sanae Kikuta vs Eugene JacksonMiddleweightEugene JacksonConfident72%
Ron Waterman vs Satoshi HonmaHeavyweightRon WatermanLean58%
Ikuhisa Minowa vs Joe SlickMiddleweightJoe SlickStrong80%
Laverne Clark vs Koji OishiLightweightLaverne ClarkConfident69%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Tito Ortiz vs Wanderlei Silva

MiddleweightTitle Fight
82%
Tito Ortiz
Ortiz
15-11-1
CO-III1233
All-Rounder
VS
Silva
5-7
CO-III1288
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 69%
Under 31%Over 69%

The Middleweight championship matchup features Tito Ortiz (15-11-1) taking on Wanderlei Silva (5-7). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Ortiz.

Silva carries a modest Elo edge (1288 to 1233), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Ortiz brings a versatile approach, while Silva is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Silva the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 4.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Ortiz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.8 more per 15 minutes. Ortiz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tito Ortiz over Wanderlei Silva. The model is firm on this one: Ortiz at 82%.

60%
Yoji Anjo
Bustamante
3-1
CO-I1581
VS
Anjo
0-3
UC-II705
Over/UnderUnder 68%
Under 68%Over 32%

The Middleweight matchup features Murilo Bustamante (3-1) taking on Yoji Anjo (0-3).

Bustamante is rated at 1581 — 876 points above Anjo's 705. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Anjo throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Anjo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Bustamante has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yoji Anjo over Murilo Bustamante. The model gives Anjo a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

72%
Eugene Jackson
Kikuta
1-0
CO-III1265
VS
Jackson
3-4
PR-I870
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 66%
Under 66%Over 34%

The Middleweight matchup features Sanae Kikuta (1-0) taking on Eugene Jackson (3-4).

Kikuta is rated at 1265 — 395 points above Jackson's 870. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jackson throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Jackson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Kikuta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eugene Jackson over Sanae Kikuta. We're leaning Jackson here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Ron Waterman
Waterman
2-1-1
RK-III1035
VS
Honma
0-1
PR-III823
Over/UnderUnder 63%
Under 63%Over 37%

The Heavyweight matchup features Ron Waterman (2-1-1) taking on Satoshi Honma (0-1).

Waterman is rated at 1035 — 212 points above Honma's 823. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Waterman throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Waterman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Honma has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ron Waterman over Satoshi Honma. The model gives Waterman a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Ikuhisa Minowa vs Joe Slick

Middleweight
80%
Joe Slick
Minowa
1-0
CO-III1313
VS
Slick
1-1
MC-II949
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Middleweight matchup features Ikuhisa Minowa (1-0) taking on Joe Slick (1-1).

Minowa is rated at 1313 — 364 points above Slick's 949. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Slick throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Slick is far more active with takedowns, averaging 10.2 more per 15 minutes. Minowa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joe Slick over Ikuhisa Minowa. The model is firm on this one: Slick at 80%.

69%
Laverne Clark
Clark
4-1
RK-I1167
VS
Oishi
0-2
MC-III904
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Lightweight matchup features Laverne Clark (4-1) taking on Koji Oishi (0-2).

Clark is rated at 1167 — 263 points above Oishi's 904. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Clark rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Clark throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Clark is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Oishi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Laverne Clark over Koji Oishi. We're leaning Clark here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.