UFC - Ultimate Brazil: Predictions & Analysis

Friday, October 16, 1998·Sao Paulo, Brazil
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC - Ultimate Brazil lands on Friday, October 16, 1998 in Sao Paulo, Brazil with 8 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Frank Shamrock vs John LoberMiddleweightFrank ShamrockConfident70%
Vitor Belfort vs Wanderlei SilvaMiddleweightVitor BelfortLean59%
Pedro Rizzo vs David AbbottHeavyweightDavid AbbottConfident68%
Pat Miletich vs Mikey BurnettLightweightMikey BurnettLean56%
Tsuyoshi Kohsaka vs Pete WilliamsHeavyweightTsuyoshi KohsakaLean62%
Ebenezer Fontes Braga vs Jeremy HornMiddleweightJeremy HornConfident69%
Tulio Palhares vs Adriano SantosMiddleweightTulio PalharesLean63%
Cesar Marscucci vs Paulo SantosLightweightCesar MarscucciLean62%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Frank Shamrock vs John Lober

Middleweight
70%
Frank Shamrock
Shamrock
5-0
CO-I1600
VS
Lober
0-1
MC-II967
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Middleweight matchup features Frank Shamrock (5-0) taking on John Lober (0-1).

Shamrock is rated at 1600 — 633 points above Lober's 967. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Shamrock rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Shamrock throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Shamrock is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Lober has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frank Shamrock over John Lober. We're leaning Shamrock here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

59%
Vitor Belfort
Belfort
15-10
CO-II1440
Knockout Artist
VS
Silva
5-7
CO-III1288
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features Vitor Belfort (15-10) taking on Wanderlei Silva (5-7).

Belfort is rated at 1440 — 152 points above Silva's 1288. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Belfort throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Belfort is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Vitor Belfort over Wanderlei Silva. The model gives Belfort a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

68%
David Abbott
Rizzo
9-5
CO-III1328
Striker
VS
Abbott
8-10
PR-I888
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 71%
Under 71%Over 29%

The Heavyweight matchup features Pedro Rizzo (9-5) taking on David Abbott (8-10).

Rizzo is rated at 1328 — 440 points above Abbott's 888. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Rizzo brings a versatile approach, while Abbott is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Abbott the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Abbott throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Abbott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Rizzo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: David Abbott over Pedro Rizzo. We're leaning Abbott here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

56%
Mikey Burnett
Miletich
8-2
CO-III1217
Submission Artist
VS
Burnett
2-1
RK-I1173
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Lightweight matchup features Pat Miletich (8-2) taking on Mikey Burnett (2-1).

Miletich carries a modest Elo edge (1217 to 1173), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Burnett throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Burnett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Burnett has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mikey Burnett over Pat Miletich. The model gives Burnett a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Tsuyoshi Kohsaka
Kohsaka
3-3
RK-II1105
Knockout Artist
VS
Williams
3-5
MC-III927
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Heavyweight matchup features Tsuyoshi Kohsaka (3-3) taking on Pete Williams (3-5).

Kohsaka is rated at 1105 — 178 points above Williams's 927. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Kohsaka's knockout artist game against Williams's wrestler approach. Kohsaka is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Williams looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kohsaka throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Williams is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Kohsaka has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tsuyoshi Kohsaka over Pete Williams. The model gives Kohsaka a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

69%
Jeremy Horn
Braga
1-0
RK-I1146
VS
Horn
6-7
RK-III1052
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 65%
Under 65%Over 35%

The Middleweight matchup features Ebenezer Fontes Braga (1-0) taking on Jeremy Horn (6-7).

There's a real Elo separation here: Braga at 1146 versus Horn at 1052. That 94-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Horn throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Horn is far more active with takedowns, averaging 11.6 more per 15 minutes. Braga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jeremy Horn over Ebenezer Fontes Braga. We're leaning Horn here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

63%
Tulio Palhares
Palhares
1-0
RK-I1191
VS
Santos
0-1
PR-III809
Over/UnderUnder 76%
Under 76%Over 24%

The Middleweight matchup features Tulio Palhares (1-0) taking on Adriano Santos (0-1).

Palhares is rated at 1191 — 382 points above Santos's 809. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tulio Palhares over Adriano Santos. The model gives Palhares a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Cesar Marscucci
Marscucci
1-0
RK-I1191
VS
Santos
0-1
PR-III809
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Lightweight matchup features Cesar Marscucci (1-0) taking on Paulo Santos (0-1).

Marscucci is rated at 1191 — 382 points above Santos's 809. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cesar Marscucci over Paulo Santos. The model gives Marscucci a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.