UFC 14: Showdown: Predictions & Analysis

Sunday, July 27, 1997·Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 14: Showdown lands on Sunday, July 27, 1997 in Birmingham, Alabama, USA with 9 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Maurice Smith vs Mark ColemanHeavyweightMark ColemanLean64%
Mark Kerr vs Dan BobishHeavyweightDan BobishToss-up54%
Kevin Jackson vs Tony FryklundLightweightTony FryklundLean64%
Dan Bobish vs Brian JohnstonHeavyweightDan BobishLean59%
Mark Kerr vs Moti HorensteinHeavyweightMark KerrStrong91%
Kevin Jackson vs Todd ButlerLightweightKevin JacksonStrong91%
Joe Moreira vs Yuri VaulinLightweightYuri VaulinToss-up54%
Alex Hunter vs Sam FultonHeavyweightAlex HunterLean65%
Tony Fryklund vs Donnie ChappellLightweightTony FryklundStrong87%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

64%
Mark Coleman
Smith
4-2
Elo 1155
Knockout Artist
VS
Coleman
7-4
Elo 995
Wrestler

The Heavyweight matchup features Maurice Smith (4-2) taking on Mark Coleman (7-4).

Smith is rated at 1155 — 160 points above Coleman's 995. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Smith is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Coleman is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against submission artists, giving Smith the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Coleman throws significantly more leather — a 5.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Coleman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.8 more per 15 minutes. Smith has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Coleman over Maurice Smith. The model gives Coleman a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Mark Kerr vs Dan Bobish

Heavyweight
54%
Dan Bobish
Kerr
2-0
Elo 1241
VS
Bobish
0-0
Elo 890

The Heavyweight matchup features Mark Kerr (2-0) taking on Dan Bobish (0-0).

Kerr is rated at 1241 — 352 points above Bobish's 890. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bobish throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Bobish is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Bobish has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dan Bobish over Mark Kerr. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Bobish at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

64%
Tony Fryklund
Jackson
2-1
Elo 977
VS
Fryklund
2-1
Elo 1024

The Lightweight matchup features Kevin Jackson (2-1) taking on Tony Fryklund (2-1).

Fryklund carries a modest Elo edge (1024 to 977), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fryklund throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Fryklund is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Fryklund has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tony Fryklund over Kevin Jackson. The model gives Fryklund a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

59%
Dan Bobish
Bobish
0-0
Elo 890
VS
Johnston
2-3
Elo 915
Submission Artist

The Heavyweight matchup features Dan Bobish (0-0) taking on Brian Johnston (2-3).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Bobish at 890, Johnston at 915. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnston throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnston is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Bobish has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dan Bobish over Brian Johnston. The model gives Bobish a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

91%
Mark Kerr
Kerr
2-0
Elo 1241
VS
Horenstein
0-1
Elo 880

The Heavyweight matchup features Mark Kerr (2-0) taking on Moti Horenstein (0-1).

Kerr is rated at 1241 — 361 points above Horenstein's 880. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kerr throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Kerr is far more active with takedowns, averaging 9.2 more per 15 minutes. Kerr has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Kerr over Moti Horenstein. The model is firm on this one: Kerr at 91%.

91%
Kevin Jackson
Jackson
2-1
Elo 977
VS
Butler
0-0
Elo 912

The Lightweight matchup features Kevin Jackson (2-1) taking on Todd Butler (0-0).

Jackson carries a modest Elo edge (977 to 912), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jackson throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Jackson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 20.4 more per 15 minutes. Butler has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kevin Jackson over Todd Butler. The model is firm on this one: Jackson at 91%.

Joe Moreira vs Yuri Vaulin

Lightweight
54%
Yuri Vaulin
Moreira
0-1
Elo 1038
VS
Vaulin
0-0
Elo 900

The Lightweight matchup features Joe Moreira (0-1) taking on Yuri Vaulin (0-0).

There's a real Elo separation here: Moreira at 1038 versus Vaulin at 900. That 138-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moreira throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Vaulin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Vaulin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yuri Vaulin over Joe Moreira. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Vaulin at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Alex Hunter vs Sam Fulton

Heavyweight
65%
Alex Hunter
Hunter
1-0
Elo 1129
VS
Fulton
0-1
Elo 812

The Heavyweight matchup features Alex Hunter (1-0) taking on Sam Fulton (0-1).

Hunter is rated at 1129 — 318 points above Fulton's 812. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fulton throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Fulton is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Fulton has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex Hunter over Sam Fulton. The model gives Hunter a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

87%
Tony Fryklund
Fryklund
2-1
Elo 1024
VS
Chappell
0-0
Elo 856

The Lightweight matchup features Tony Fryklund (2-1) taking on Donnie Chappell (0-0).

Fryklund is rated at 1024 — 168 points above Chappell's 856. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Chappell throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Chappell is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Chappell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tony Fryklund over Donnie Chappell. The model is firm on this one: Fryklund at 87%.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC 14: Showdown Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker