UFC 246: McGregor vs. Cowboy: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, January 18, 2020·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 19, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 246: McGregor vs. Cowboy lands on Saturday, January 18, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Conor McGregor vs Donald CerroneWelterweightConor McGregorConfident69%
Holly Holm vs Raquel PenningtonWomen's BantamweightRaquel PenningtonToss-up51%
Aleksei Oleinik vs Maurice GreeneHeavyweightAleksei OleinikToss-up51%
Brian Kelleher vs Ode OsbourneBantamweightOde OsbourneLean56%
Diego Ferreira vs Anthony PettisLightweightDiego FerreiraConfident67%
Roxanne Modafferi vs Maycee BarberWomen's FlyweightMaycee BarberToss-up54%
Sodiq Yusuff vs Andre FiliFeatherweightSodiq YusuffToss-up51%
Askar Askarov vs Tim ElliottFlyweightTim ElliottToss-up50%
Drew Dober vs Nasrat HaqparastLightweightNasrat HaqparastConfident74%
Aleksa Camur vs Justin LedetLight HeavyweightAleksa CamurLean57%
Sabina Mazo vs JJ AldrichWomen's FlyweightSabina MazoConfident67%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

69%
Conor McGregor
McGregor
10-4
CH-III1685
Striker
VS
Cerrone
23-14
CO-III1238
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Welterweight matchup features Conor McGregor (10-4) taking on Donald Cerrone (23-14). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Cerrone.

McGregor is rated at 1685 — 448 points above Cerrone's 1238. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: McGregor brings a versatile approach, while Cerrone is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Cerrone the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cerrone throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Cerrone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Cerrone has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Conor McGregor over Donald Cerrone. We're leaning McGregor here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 72% for McGregor, but our model sees only 69%. That 3-point gap favoring Cerrone is worth watching.

Holly Holm vs Raquel Pennington

Women's Bantamweight
51%
Raquel Pennington
Holm
8-7
CO-III1225
Striker
VS
Pennington
13-6
CO-II1433
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Holly Holm (8-7) taking on Raquel Pennington (13-6).

Pennington is rated at 1433 — 207 points above Holm's 1225. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pennington has won 6 straight.

The style clash matters here: Holm is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Pennington looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Pennington the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pennington throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Pennington is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Pennington has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Raquel Pennington over Holly Holm. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pennington at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 58% for Holm, but our model sees only 49%. That 9-point gap favoring Pennington is worth watching.

51%
Aleksei Oleinik
Oleinik
9-8
RK-I1176
Wrestler
VS
Greene
4-4
MC-II947
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Heavyweight matchup features Aleksei Oleinik (9-8) taking on Maurice Greene (4-4). There's a 5-inch height gap favoring Greene.

Oleinik is rated at 1176 — 229 points above Greene's 947. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Oleinik looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Greene is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Oleinik the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Greene throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Oleinik is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Greene has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aleksei Oleinik over Maurice Greene. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Oleinik at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

56%
Ode Osbourne
Kelleher
8-9
PR-I895
Wrestler
VS
Osbourne
5-8
MC-III908
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Bantamweight matchup features Brian Kelleher (8-9) taking on Ode Osbourne (5-8). Osbourne will look to use a 7-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Kelleher at 895, Osbourne at 908. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kelleher throws significantly more leather — a 5.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Kelleher is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Osbourne has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ode Osbourne over Brian Kelleher. The model gives Osbourne a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

67%
Diego Ferreira
Ferreira
10-7
CO-III1327
All-Rounder
VS
Pettis
11-9
CO-I1579
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Lightweight matchup features Diego Ferreira (10-7) taking on Anthony Pettis (11-9).

Pettis is rated at 1579 — 252 points above Ferreira's 1327. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Ferreira's all-rounder game against Pettis's knockout artist approach. Ferreira is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Pettis is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferreira throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Ferreira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Ferreira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Ferreira over Anthony Pettis. We're leaning Ferreira here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Roxanne Modafferi vs Maycee Barber

Women's Flyweight
54%
Maycee Barber
Modafferi
4-8
RK-III1036
Striker
VS
Barber
10-3
CO-I1479
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Roxanne Modafferi (4-8) taking on Maycee Barber (10-3). Modafferi is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Barber is rated at 1479 — 444 points above Modafferi's 1036. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Barber has won 7 straight.

Stylistically this is Modafferi's all-rounder game against Barber's striker approach. Modafferi is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Barber brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barber throws significantly more leather — a 5.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Modafferi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Modafferi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Maycee Barber over Roxanne Modafferi. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Barber at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Modafferi at 12% implied while our model sees 46% — a 33-point disagreement that could signal value.

Sodiq Yusuff vs Andre Fili

Featherweight
51%
Sodiq Yusuff
Yusuff
6-4
CO-III1221
All-Rounder
VS
Fili
13-12
RK-I1176
Striker
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Featherweight matchup features Sodiq Yusuff (6-4) taking on Andre Fili (13-12). Fili is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Yusuff carries a modest Elo edge (1221 to 1176), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yusuff throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Fili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Yusuff has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sodiq Yusuff over Andre Fili. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Yusuff at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 56% for Yusuff, but our model sees only 51%. That 5-point gap favoring Fili is worth watching.

50%
Tim Elliott
Askarov
3-1-1
CO-II1436
VS
Elliott
10-11
CO-III1232
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Flyweight matchup features Askar Askarov (3-1-1) taking on Tim Elliott (10-11).

Askarov is rated at 1436 — 204 points above Elliott's 1232. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Askarov rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Elliott throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Elliott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Askarov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tim Elliott over Askar Askarov. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Elliott at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 57% for Askarov, but our model sees only 50%. That 7-point gap favoring Elliott is worth watching.

74%
Nasrat Haqparast
Dober
15-11
CO-III1301
All-Rounder
VS
Haqparast
10-5
CO-III1321
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Lightweight matchup features Drew Dober (15-11) taking on Nasrat Haqparast (10-5). Haqparast is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Dober at 1301, Haqparast at 1321. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets. Haqparast has won 5 straight.

Stylistically this is Dober's all-rounder game against Haqparast's striker approach. Dober is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Haqparast brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dober throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Dober is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Haqparast has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nasrat Haqparast over Drew Dober. We're leaning Haqparast here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Aleksa Camur vs Justin Ledet

Light Heavyweight
57%
Aleksa Camur
Camur
1-3
UC-I759
VS
Ledet
3-4
UC-I755
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Aleksa Camur (1-3) taking on Justin Ledet (3-4). Ledet is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Camur at 759, Ledet at 755. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ledet throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Ledet is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Camur has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aleksa Camur over Justin Ledet. The model gives Camur a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Camur at 54% implied while our model sees 57% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

Sabina Mazo vs JJ Aldrich

Women's Flyweight
67%
Sabina Mazo
Mazo
3-4
PR-III820
All-Rounder
VS
Aldrich
10-6
RK-II1113
Striker
Over/UnderOver 66%
Under 34%Over 66%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Sabina Mazo (3-4) taking on JJ Aldrich (10-6). Mazo is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Aldrich is rated at 1113 — 292 points above Mazo's 820. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Mazo's all-rounder game against Aldrich's striker approach. Mazo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Aldrich brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mazo throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Mazo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Mazo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sabina Mazo over JJ Aldrich. We're leaning Mazo here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.