UFC Fight Night: Ngannou vs. Dos Santos: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, June 29, 2019·Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Ngannou vs. Dos Santos lands on Saturday, June 29, 2019 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA with 12 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Francis Ngannou vs Junior Dos SantosHeavyweightFrancis NgannouConfident66%
Joseph Benavidez vs Jussier FormigaFlyweightJoseph BenavidezToss-up54%
Demian Maia vs Anthony Rocco MartinWelterweightAnthony Rocco MartinToss-up52%
Vinc Pichel vs Roosevelt RobertsLightweightRoosevelt RobertsStrong76%
Drew Dober vs Marco Polo ReyesLightweightDrew DoberStrong90%
Alonzo Menifield vs Paul CraigLight HeavyweightAlonzo MenifieldStrong77%
Ricardo Ramos vs Journey NewsonBantamweightRicardo RamosStrong89%
Eryk Anders vs Vinicius MoreiraLight HeavyweightEryk AndersConfident74%
Jared Gordon vs Dan MoretLightweightJared GordonStrong79%
Dalcha Lungiambula vs Dequan TownsendLight HeavyweightDalcha LungiambulaStrong87%
Amanda Ribas vs Emily WhitmireWomen's StrawweightEmily WhitmireToss-up52%
Maurice Greene vs Junior AlbiniHeavyweightMaurice GreeneLean56%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

66%
Francis Ngannou
Ngannou
12-2
CH-I2193
Knockout Artist
VS
Santos
15-8
CO-II1427
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Heavyweight matchup features Francis Ngannou (12-2) taking on Junior Dos Santos (15-8). Ngannou will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ngannou is rated at 2193 — 766 points above Santos's 1427. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ngannou rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Ngannou is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Santos brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Ngannou the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Francis Ngannou over Junior Dos Santos. We're leaning Ngannou here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

54%
Joseph Benavidez
Benavidez
15-6
CO-II1420
Wrestler
VS
Formiga
9-7
CO-III1271
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Flyweight matchup features Joseph Benavidez (15-6) taking on Jussier Formiga (9-7).

There's a real Elo separation here: Benavidez at 1420 versus Formiga at 1271. That 149-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Benavidez throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Benavidez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Formiga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joseph Benavidez over Jussier Formiga. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Benavidez at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

52%
Anthony Rocco Martin
Maia
22-11
CO-I1506
Wrestler
VS
Martin
9-6
CO-I1520
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Welterweight matchup features Demian Maia (22-11) taking on Anthony Rocco Martin (9-6).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Maia at 1506, Martin at 1520. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Maia is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Martin looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Martin the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Martin throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Maia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Maia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Rocco Martin over Demian Maia. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Martin at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

76%
Roosevelt Roberts
Pichel
7-5
RK-I1162
All-Rounder
VS
Roberts
4-5
MC-II943
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Lightweight matchup features Vinc Pichel (7-5) taking on Roosevelt Roberts (4-5). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Roberts.

Pichel is rated at 1162 — 218 points above Roberts's 943. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roberts throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Pichel is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Roberts has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Roosevelt Roberts over Vinc Pichel. The model is firm on this one: Roberts at 76%. The market implies 30% for Pichel, but our model sees only 24%. That 6-point gap favoring Roberts is worth watching.

90%
Drew Dober
Dober
15-11
CO-III1301
All-Rounder
VS
Reyes
4-4
UC-I780
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Lightweight matchup features Drew Dober (15-11) taking on Marco Polo Reyes (4-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Reyes.

Dober is rated at 1301 — 521 points above Reyes's 780. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Dober's all-rounder game against Reyes's striker approach. Dober is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Reyes brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Reyes throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Dober is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Reyes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Drew Dober over Marco Polo Reyes. The model is firm on this one: Dober at 90%. Notably, the betting market has Dober at 78% implied while our model sees 90% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

Alonzo Menifield vs Paul Craig

Light Heavyweight
77%
Alonzo Menifield
Menifield
10-6-1
CO-III1314
All-Rounder
VS
Craig
9-10-1
RK-I1180
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alonzo Menifield (10-6-1) taking on Paul Craig (9-10-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Craig.

There's a real Elo separation here: Menifield at 1314 versus Craig at 1180. That 134-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Menifield is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Craig looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Craig the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Menifield throws significantly more leather — a 6.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Craig is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Menifield has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alonzo Menifield over Paul Craig. The model is firm on this one: Menifield at 77%. Notably, the betting market has Menifield at 73% implied while our model sees 77% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

89%
Ricardo Ramos
Ramos
8-7
MC-III908
All-Rounder
VS
Newson
1-4
PR-III814
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Ricardo Ramos (8-7) taking on Journey Newson (1-4). Ramos is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Ramos at 908 versus Newson at 814. That 94-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ramos throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Ramos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Newson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricardo Ramos over Journey Newson. The model is firm on this one: Ramos at 89%. Notably, the betting market has Ramos at 77% implied while our model sees 89% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

Eryk Anders vs Vinicius Moreira

Light Heavyweight
74%
Eryk Anders
Anders
10-9
CO-III1233
Striker
VS
Moreira
0-4
UC-III470
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Eryk Anders (10-9) taking on Vinicius Moreira (0-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Moreira.

Anders is rated at 1233 — 764 points above Moreira's 470. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moreira throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Anders is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Anders has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eryk Anders over Vinicius Moreira. We're leaning Anders here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Jared Gordon vs Dan Moret

Lightweight
79%
Jared Gordon
Gordon
9-7
CO-III1301
Striker
VS
Moret
0-3
UC-I746
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Lightweight matchup features Jared Gordon (9-7) taking on Dan Moret (0-3). Moret is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Gordon is rated at 1301 — 555 points above Moret's 746. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gordon throws significantly more leather — a 4.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Gordon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Gordon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jared Gordon over Dan Moret. The model is firm on this one: Gordon at 79%. Notably, the betting market has Gordon at 75% implied while our model sees 79% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

87%
Dalcha Lungiambula
Lungiambula
2-5
UC-II732
Striker
VS
Townsend
0-4
UC-III627
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Dalcha Lungiambula (2-5) taking on Dequan Townsend (0-4). Townsend is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Lungiambula at 732 versus Townsend at 627. That 105-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Townsend throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Townsend is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Townsend has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dalcha Lungiambula over Dequan Townsend. The model is firm on this one: Lungiambula at 87%. Notably, the betting market has Lungiambula at 78% implied while our model sees 87% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

Amanda Ribas vs Emily Whitmire

Women's Strawweight
52%
Emily Whitmire
Ribas
7-6
RK-I1163
All-Rounder
VS
Whitmire
2-4
UC-III643
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Amanda Ribas (7-6) taking on Emily Whitmire (2-4). Ribas will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ribas is rated at 1163 — 520 points above Whitmire's 643. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Ribas is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Whitmire looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Whitmire the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Whitmire throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Whitmire is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Ribas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Emily Whitmire over Amanda Ribas. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Whitmire at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Ribas at 37% implied while our model sees 48% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

56%
Maurice Greene
Greene
4-4
MC-II947
All-Rounder
VS
Albini
1-4
UC-I790
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Heavyweight matchup features Maurice Greene (4-4) taking on Junior Albini (1-4). Greene is the bigger frame at 6'7" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Greene is rated at 947 — 157 points above Albini's 790. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Greene throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Albini is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Greene has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Maurice Greene over Junior Albini. The model gives Greene a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Greene at 51% implied while our model sees 56% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.