UFC 236: Holloway vs. Poirier 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, April 13, 2019·Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 236: Holloway vs. Poirier 2 lands on Saturday, April 13, 2019 in Atlanta, Georgia, USA with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by 2 title bouts. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Dustin Poirier vs Max HollowayLightweightMax HollowayConfident67%
Israel Adesanya vs Kelvin GastelumMiddleweightIsrael AdesanyaStrong83%
Khalil Rountree Jr. vs Eryk AndersLight HeavyweightEryk AndersToss-up54%
Dwight Grant vs Alan JoubanWelterweightDwight GrantLean60%
Nikita Krylov vs Ovince Saint PreuxLight HeavyweightOvince Saint PreuxLean57%
Matt Frevola vs Jalin TurnerLightweightMatt FrevolaLean58%
Alexandre Pantoja vs Wilson ReisFlyweightAlexandre PantojaConfident65%
Max Griffin vs Zelim ImadaevWelterweightMax GriffinToss-up55%
Khalid Taha vs Boston SalmonBantamweightBoston SalmonToss-up53%
Belal Muhammad vs Curtis MillenderWelterweightBelal MuhammadLean60%
Montel Jackson vs Andre SoukhamthathBantamweightMontel JacksonStrong90%
Poliana Botelho vs Lauren MuellerWomen's FlyweightLauren MuellerToss-up53%
Brandon Davis vs Randy CostaBantamweightRandy CostaLean62%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Dustin Poirier vs Max Holloway

LightweightTitle Fight
67%
Max Holloway
Poirier
22-9
CH-II1779
Knockout Artist
VS
Holloway
23-9
CH-I1901
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 66%
Under 34%Over 66%

The Lightweight championship matchup features Dustin Poirier (22-9) taking on Max Holloway (23-9). Poirier will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Holloway at 1901 versus Poirier at 1779. That 123-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Poirier's all-rounder game against Holloway's knockout artist approach. Poirier is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Holloway is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Holloway throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Poirier is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Holloway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Max Holloway over Dustin Poirier. We're leaning Holloway here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Israel Adesanya vs Kelvin Gastelum

MiddleweightTitle Fight
83%
Israel Adesanya
Adesanya
13-6
CH-III1638
Striker
VS
Gastelum
14-10
CO-II1457
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 68%
Under 32%Over 68%

The Middleweight championship matchup features Israel Adesanya (13-6) taking on Kelvin Gastelum (14-10). Adesanya is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

Adesanya is rated at 1638 — 182 points above Gastelum's 1457. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Adesanya's all-rounder game against Gastelum's knockout artist approach. Adesanya is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Gastelum is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Adesanya throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Gastelum is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Adesanya has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Israel Adesanya over Kelvin Gastelum. The model is firm on this one: Adesanya at 83%. Notably, the betting market has Adesanya at 62% implied while our model sees 83% — a 21-point disagreement that could signal value.

Khalil Rountree Jr. vs Eryk Anders

Light Heavyweight
54%
Eryk Anders
Jr.
10-7
CO-I1559
Striker
VS
Anders
10-9
CO-III1233
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Khalil Rountree Jr. (10-7) taking on Eryk Anders (10-9).

Jr. is rated at 1559 — 326 points above Anders's 1233. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Jr.'s knockout artist game against Anders's all-rounder approach. Jr. is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Anders is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jr. throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Anders is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Anders has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eryk Anders over Khalil Rountree Jr.. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Anders at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Dwight Grant vs Alan Jouban

Welterweight
60%
Dwight Grant
Grant
3-5
PR-II858
Striker
VS
Jouban
8-5
CO-III1244
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Welterweight matchup features Dwight Grant (3-5) taking on Alan Jouban (8-5). Grant will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jouban is rated at 1244 — 386 points above Grant's 858. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jouban throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Grant is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Grant has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dwight Grant over Alan Jouban. The model gives Grant a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Grant at 53% implied while our model sees 60% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

Nikita Krylov vs Ovince Saint Preux

Light Heavyweight
57%
Ovince Saint Preux
Krylov
12-9
CO-I1472
Submission Artist
VS
Preux
15-13
RK-III1056
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Nikita Krylov (12-9) taking on Ovince Saint Preux (15-13). Preux will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Krylov is rated at 1472 — 416 points above Preux's 1056. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Krylov's submission artist game against Preux's knockout artist approach. Krylov is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Preux is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Krylov throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Krylov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Krylov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ovince Saint Preux over Nikita Krylov. The model gives Preux a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

58%
Matt Frevola
Frevola
5-6-1
RK-I1193
Knockout Artist
VS
Turner
8-6
CO-I1491
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Matt Frevola (5-6-1) taking on Jalin Turner (8-6). Turner is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Turner is rated at 1491 — 298 points above Frevola's 1193. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Frevola's knockout artist game against Turner's all-rounder approach. Frevola is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Turner is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Turner throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Frevola is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Frevola has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Frevola over Jalin Turner. The model gives Frevola a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Frevola at 40% implied while our model sees 58% — a 17-point disagreement that could signal value.

65%
Alexandre Pantoja
Pantoja
14-4
CO-I1543
Wrestler
VS
Reis
7-6
RK-I1141
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Flyweight matchup features Alexandre Pantoja (14-4) taking on Wilson Reis (7-6).

Pantoja is rated at 1543 — 402 points above Reis's 1141. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pantoja rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pantoja throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Reis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.1 more per 15 minutes. Pantoja has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexandre Pantoja over Wilson Reis. We're leaning Pantoja here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Pantoja at 60% implied while our model sees 65% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

Max Griffin vs Zelim Imadaev

Welterweight
55%
Max Griffin
Griffin
8-10
CO-III1276
Striker
VS
Imadaev
0-3
UC-II708
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features Max Griffin (8-10) taking on Zelim Imadaev (0-3).

Griffin is rated at 1276 — 568 points above Imadaev's 708. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 4.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Imadaev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Max Griffin over Zelim Imadaev. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Griffin at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Griffin at 46% implied while our model sees 55% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

Khalid Taha vs Boston Salmon

Bantamweight
53%
Boston Salmon
Taha
1-4
PR-III803
VS
Salmon
0-2
UC-III585
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Bantamweight matchup features Khalid Taha (1-4) taking on Boston Salmon (0-2). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Salmon.

Taha is rated at 803 — 217 points above Salmon's 585. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Taha throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Salmon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Salmon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Boston Salmon over Khalid Taha. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Salmon at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Taha at 41% implied while our model sees 47% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

60%
Belal Muhammad
Muhammad
15-5
CH-I1817
All-Rounder
VS
Millender
3-2
CO-III1284
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Welterweight matchup features Belal Muhammad (15-5) taking on Curtis Millender (3-2). Millender is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Muhammad is rated at 1817 — 532 points above Millender's 1284. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Muhammad throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Muhammad is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Muhammad has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Belal Muhammad over Curtis Millender. The model gives Muhammad a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

90%
Montel Jackson
Jackson
9-3
CO-I1538
Knockout Artist
VS
Soukhamthath
2-5
MC-III908
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Montel Jackson (9-3) taking on Andre Soukhamthath (2-5). Jackson will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jackson is rated at 1538 — 630 points above Soukhamthath's 908. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Jackson rides a 6-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Soukhamthath throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Jackson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Soukhamthath has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Montel Jackson over Andre Soukhamthath. The model is firm on this one: Jackson at 90%. Notably, the betting market has Jackson at 83% implied while our model sees 90% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

Poliana Botelho vs Lauren Mueller

Women's Flyweight
53%
Lauren Mueller
Botelho
3-4
PR-II861
Striker
VS
Mueller
1-3
UC-I787
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Poliana Botelho (3-4) taking on Lauren Mueller (1-3). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Botelho.

Botelho carries a modest Elo edge (861 to 787), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Botelho throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Mueller is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Mueller has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Lauren Mueller over Poliana Botelho. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Mueller at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 60% for Botelho, but our model sees only 47%. That 13-point gap favoring Mueller is worth watching.

Brandon Davis vs Randy Costa

Bantamweight
62%
Randy Costa
Davis
2-7
PR-II846
All-Rounder
VS
Costa
2-4
PR-III820
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Brandon Davis (2-7) taking on Randy Costa (2-4).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Davis at 846, Costa at 820. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Davis's all-rounder game against Costa's striker approach. Davis is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Costa brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Davis throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Davis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Costa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Randy Costa over Brandon Davis. The model gives Costa a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 62% for Davis, but our model sees only 38%. That 24-point gap favoring Costa is worth watching.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.