UFC 228: Woodley vs. Till: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, September 8, 2018·Dallas, Texas, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 228: Woodley vs. Till lands on Saturday, September 8, 2018 in Dallas, Texas, USA with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Tyron Woodley vs Darren TillWelterweightDarren TillLean62%
Jessica Andrade vs Karolina KowalkiewiczWomen's StrawweightJessica AndradeStrong88%
Zabit Magomedsharipov vs Brandon DavisFeatherweightZabit MagomedsharipovStrong75%
Jimmie Rivera vs John DodsonBantamweightJimmie RiveraLean57%
Abdul Razak Alhassan vs Niko PriceWelterweightNiko PriceLean59%
Tatiana Suarez vs Carla EsparzaWomen's StrawweightTatiana SuarezStrong90%
Aljamain Sterling vs Cody StamannBantamweightAljamain SterlingLean64%
Geoff Neal vs Frank CamachoWelterweightGeoff NealLean63%
Darren Stewart vs Charles ByrdMiddleweightDarren StewartLean63%
Diego Sanchez vs Craig WhiteWelterweightDiego SanchezToss-up51%
Jim Miller vs Alex WhiteLightweightAlex WhiteLean55%
Irene Aldana vs Lucie PudilovaWomen's BantamweightLucie PudilovaLean56%
Jarred Brooks vs Robert SanchezFlyweightJarred BrooksLean60%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Tyron Woodley vs Darren Till

Welterweight
62%
Darren Till
Woodley
9-6-1
CH-III1642
All-Rounder
VS
Till
6-5-1
CO-II1425
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Welterweight matchup features Tyron Woodley (9-6-1) taking on Darren Till (6-5-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Till.

Woodley is rated at 1642 — 217 points above Till's 1425. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Woodley's all-rounder game against Till's striker approach. Woodley is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Till brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Till throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Till is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Woodley has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Darren Till over Tyron Woodley. The model gives Till a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 48% for Woodley, but our model sees only 38%. That 11-point gap favoring Till is worth watching.

88%
Jessica Andrade
Andrade
17-13
CO-III1240
Knockout Artist
VS
Kowalkiewicz
9-10
MC-II940
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Jessica Andrade (17-13) taking on Karolina Kowalkiewicz (9-10). Kowalkiewicz is the bigger frame at 5'3" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Andrade is rated at 1240 — 300 points above Kowalkiewicz's 940. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Andrade's wrestler game against Kowalkiewicz's striker approach. Andrade looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Kowalkiewicz brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Andrade throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Andrade is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.8 more per 15 minutes. Kowalkiewicz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jessica Andrade over Karolina Kowalkiewicz. The model is firm on this one: Andrade at 88%. Notably, the betting market has Andrade at 80% implied while our model sees 88% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

75%
Zabit Magomedsharipov
Magomedsharipov
6-0
CO-I1581
Wrestler
VS
Davis
2-7
PR-II846
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Featherweight matchup features Zabit Magomedsharipov (6-0) taking on Brandon Davis (2-7). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Magomedsharipov.

Magomedsharipov is rated at 1581 — 735 points above Davis's 846. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Magomedsharipov rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Magomedsharipov looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Davis is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Magomedsharipov the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Magomedsharipov throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Magomedsharipov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.2 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Zabit Magomedsharipov over Brandon Davis. The model is firm on this one: Magomedsharipov at 75%. The market implies 91% for Magomedsharipov, but our model sees only 75%. That 16-point gap favoring Davis is worth watching.

Jimmie Rivera vs John Dodson

Bantamweight
57%
Jimmie Rivera
Rivera
7-4
CO-II1411
All-Rounder
VS
Dodson
10-7
CO-II1376
Striker
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Bantamweight matchup features Jimmie Rivera (7-4) taking on John Dodson (10-7).

Rivera carries a modest Elo edge (1411 to 1376), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rivera throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Rivera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Dodson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jimmie Rivera over John Dodson. The model gives Rivera a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

59%
Niko Price
Alhassan
6-7
RK-II1071
Knockout Artist
VS
Price
8-11
MC-I975
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Welterweight matchup features Abdul Razak Alhassan (6-7) taking on Niko Price (8-11). Price is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Alhassan at 1071 versus Price at 975. That 95-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Alhassan's knockout artist game against Price's all-rounder approach. Alhassan is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Price is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Alhassan throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Price is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Alhassan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Niko Price over Abdul Razak Alhassan. The model gives Price a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 51% for Alhassan, but our model sees only 41%. That 9-point gap favoring Price is worth watching.

Tatiana Suarez vs Carla Esparza

Women's Strawweight
90%
Tatiana Suarez
Suarez
8-1
CH-III1629
Wrestler
VS
Esparza
10-6
CO-II1374
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Tatiana Suarez (8-1) taking on Carla Esparza (10-6). Suarez is the bigger frame at 5'5" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Suarez is rated at 1629 — 255 points above Esparza's 1374. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Suarez throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Suarez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Esparza has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tatiana Suarez over Carla Esparza. The model is firm on this one: Suarez at 90%. Notably, the betting market has Suarez at 78% implied while our model sees 90% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

64%
Aljamain Sterling
Sterling
17-5
CH-II1790
Wrestler
VS
Stamann
7-7-1
RK-II1072
Striker
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Bantamweight matchup features Aljamain Sterling (17-5) taking on Cody Stamann (7-7-1). Sterling will look to use a 7-inch reach edge to control distance.

Sterling is rated at 1790 — 719 points above Stamann's 1072. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Sterling's all-rounder game against Stamann's striker approach. Sterling is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Stamann brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stamann throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Stamann is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Sterling has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aljamain Sterling over Cody Stamann. The model gives Sterling a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Geoff Neal vs Frank Camacho

Welterweight
63%
Geoff Neal
Neal
8-6
CO-II1442
All-Rounder
VS
Camacho
2-6
UC-I788
Striker
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Welterweight matchup features Geoff Neal (8-6) taking on Frank Camacho (2-6).

Neal is rated at 1442 — 654 points above Camacho's 788. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Neal's all-rounder game against Camacho's striker approach. Neal is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Camacho brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Camacho throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Camacho is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Neal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Geoff Neal over Frank Camacho. The model gives Neal a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

63%
Darren Stewart
Stewart
5-7
RK-III1024
All-Rounder
VS
Byrd
1-3
UC-III624
Over/UnderUnder 62%
Under 62%Over 38%

The Middleweight matchup features Darren Stewart (5-7) taking on Charles Byrd (1-3).

Stewart is rated at 1024 — 400 points above Byrd's 624. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stewart throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Byrd is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Byrd has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Darren Stewart over Charles Byrd. The model gives Stewart a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Stewart at 38% implied while our model sees 63% — a 24-point disagreement that could signal value.

Diego Sanchez vs Craig White

Welterweight
51%
Diego Sanchez
Sanchez
19-13
CO-III1216
Striker
VS
White
0-2
MC-III922
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Diego Sanchez (19-13) taking on Craig White (0-2). White is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Sanchez is rated at 1216 — 295 points above White's 922. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sanchez throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Sanchez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Sanchez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Sanchez over Craig White. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sanchez at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Sanchez at 34% implied while our model sees 51% — a 17-point disagreement that could signal value.

Jim Miller vs Alex White

Lightweight
55%
Alex White
Miller
27-18
CO-III1295
Submission Artist
VS
White
4-6
MC-II940
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Jim Miller (27-18) taking on Alex White (4-6). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring White.

Miller is rated at 1295 — 354 points above White's 940. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Miller looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while White is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Miller the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. White throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Miller is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. White has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex White over Jim Miller. The model gives White a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Miller at 39% implied while our model sees 45% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

Irene Aldana vs Lucie Pudilova

Women's Bantamweight
56%
Lucie Pudilova
Aldana
8-6
CO-II1411
All-Rounder
VS
Pudilova
3-8
UC-I796
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Irene Aldana (8-6) taking on Lucie Pudilova (3-8).

Aldana is rated at 1411 — 615 points above Pudilova's 796. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aldana throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Aldana is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Aldana has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Lucie Pudilova over Irene Aldana. The model gives Pudilova a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 51% for Aldana, but our model sees only 44%. That 7-point gap favoring Pudilova is worth watching.

60%
Jarred Brooks
Brooks
2-2
MC-II963
VS
Sanchez
1-2
PR-II834
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Flyweight matchup features Jarred Brooks (2-2) taking on Robert Sanchez (1-2). Sanchez is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Brooks at 963 versus Sanchez at 834. That 129-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brooks throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Sanchez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.9 more per 15 minutes. Brooks has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jarred Brooks over Robert Sanchez. The model gives Brooks a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.