UFC Fight Night: Barboza vs. Lee: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, April 21, 2018·Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Barboza vs. Lee lands on Saturday, April 21, 2018 in Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Kevin Lee vs Edson BarbozaLightweightKevin LeeConfident72%
Frankie Edgar vs Cub SwansonFeatherweightFrankie EdgarStrong75%
Justin Willis vs Chase ShermanHeavyweightJustin WillisStrong81%
David Branch vs Thiago SantosMiddleweightThiago SantosToss-up54%
Aljamain Sterling vs Brett JohnsBantamweightAljamain SterlingToss-up52%
Dan Hooker vs Jim MillerLightweightDan HookerLean65%
Ryan LaFlare vs Alex GarciaWelterweightRyan LaFlareToss-up51%
Ricky Simon vs Merab DvalishviliBantamweightRicky SimonLean59%
Siyar Bahadurzada vs Luan ChagasWelterweightLuan ChagasToss-up52%
Corey Anderson vs Patrick CumminsLight HeavyweightCorey AndersonConfident69%
Anthony Rocco Martin vs Keita NakamuraWelterweightAnthony Rocco MartinToss-up55%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Kevin Lee vs Edson Barboza

LightweightTitle Fight
72%
Kevin Lee
Lee
11-8
CO-II1373
Wrestler
VS
Barboza
18-14
CO-III1310
Striker
Over/UnderOver 67%
Under 33%Over 67%

The Lightweight championship matchup features Kevin Lee (11-8) taking on Edson Barboza (18-14).

Lee carries a modest Elo edge (1373 to 1310), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Lee's wrestler game against Barboza's striker approach. Lee looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Barboza brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barboza throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Lee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.1 more per 15 minutes. Barboza has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kevin Lee over Edson Barboza. We're leaning Lee here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Lee at 60% implied while our model sees 72% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

Frankie Edgar vs Cub Swanson

Featherweight
75%
Frankie Edgar
Edgar
18-11-1
CO-II1361
All-Rounder
VS
Swanson
15-10
CO-III1323
Striker
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Featherweight matchup features Frankie Edgar (18-11-1) taking on Cub Swanson (15-10). Swanson is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Edgar carries a modest Elo edge (1361 to 1323), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Swanson throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Edgar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Edgar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frankie Edgar over Cub Swanson. The model is firm on this one: Edgar at 75%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

81%
Justin Willis
Willis
4-1
CO-II1402
VS
Sherman
4-11
PR-II851
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Heavyweight matchup features Justin Willis (4-1) taking on Chase Sherman (4-11). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Sherman.

Willis is rated at 1402 — 552 points above Sherman's 851. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Willis rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sherman throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Willis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Willis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Justin Willis over Chase Sherman. The model is firm on this one: Willis at 81%. Notably, the betting market has Willis at 73% implied while our model sees 81% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

54%
Thiago Santos
Branch
4-5
CO-III1211
Striker
VS
Santos
14-10
CO-II1426
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features David Branch (4-5) taking on Thiago Santos (14-10).

Santos is rated at 1426 — 215 points above Branch's 1211. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 4.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Branch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thiago Santos over David Branch. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Santos at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Branch at 39% implied while our model sees 46% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Aljamain Sterling
Sterling
17-5
CH-II1790
Wrestler
VS
Johns
5-2
CO-II1350
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 66%
Under 34%Over 66%

The Bantamweight matchup features Aljamain Sterling (17-5) taking on Brett Johns (5-2).

Sterling is rated at 1790 — 440 points above Johns's 1350. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Sterling is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Johns looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Johns the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sterling throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Johns is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.9 more per 15 minutes. Sterling has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aljamain Sterling over Brett Johns. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sterling at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Dan Hooker vs Jim Miller

Lightweight
65%
Dan Hooker
Hooker
14-10
CO-I1533
Knockout Artist
VS
Miller
27-18
CO-III1295
Submission Artist
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Lightweight matchup features Dan Hooker (14-10) taking on Jim Miller (27-18). Hooker is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Hooker is rated at 1533 — 238 points above Miller's 1295. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miller throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Miller is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Hooker has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dan Hooker over Jim Miller. The model gives Hooker a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

Ryan LaFlare vs Alex Garcia

Welterweight
51%
Ryan LaFlare
LaFlare
7-3
CO-III1248
Striker
VS
Garcia
5-5
RK-II1080
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Welterweight matchup features Ryan LaFlare (7-3) taking on Alex Garcia (5-5). LaFlare is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

LaFlare is rated at 1248 — 167 points above Garcia's 1080. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is LaFlare's striker game against Garcia's wrestler approach. LaFlare brings a versatile approach, while Garcia looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. LaFlare throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Garcia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Garcia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ryan LaFlare over Alex Garcia. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward LaFlare at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 58% for LaFlare, but our model sees only 51%. That 7-point gap favoring Garcia is worth watching.

59%
Ricky Simon
Simon
10-6-1
CO-III1297
All-Rounder
VS
Dvalishvili
14-3
CH-I1939
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Bantamweight matchup features Ricky Simon (10-6-1) taking on Merab Dvalishvili (14-3).

Dvalishvili is rated at 1939 — 642 points above Simon's 1297. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Dvalishvili has won 14 straight.

The style clash matters here: Simon is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Dvalishvili looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Dvalishvili the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dvalishvili throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Dvalishvili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 11.0 more per 15 minutes. Simon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricky Simon over Merab Dvalishvili. The model gives Simon a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Simon at 56% implied while our model sees 59% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Luan Chagas
Bahadurzada
4-4
RK-I1169
All-Rounder
VS
Chagas
1-2-1
MC-I997
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Welterweight matchup features Siyar Bahadurzada (4-4) taking on Luan Chagas (1-2-1).

Bahadurzada is rated at 1169 — 172 points above Chagas's 997. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Chagas throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Bahadurzada is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Chagas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Luan Chagas over Siyar Bahadurzada. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Chagas at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Bahadurzada at 40% implied while our model sees 48% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

Corey Anderson vs Patrick Cummins

Light Heavyweight
69%
Corey Anderson
Anderson
10-5
CO-I1502
Striker
VS
Cummins
6-7
RK-III1032
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Corey Anderson (10-5) taking on Patrick Cummins (6-7). Anderson will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Anderson is rated at 1502 — 470 points above Cummins's 1032. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Anderson rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cummins throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Cummins is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Anderson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Corey Anderson over Patrick Cummins. We're leaning Anderson here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Anderson at 58% implied while our model sees 69% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

55%
Anthony Rocco Martin
Martin
9-6
CO-I1520
All-Rounder
VS
Nakamura
4-7
RK-III1039
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Welterweight matchup features Anthony Rocco Martin (9-6) taking on Keita Nakamura (4-7).

Martin is rated at 1520 — 481 points above Nakamura's 1039. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Martin throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Nakamura is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Martin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Rocco Martin over Keita Nakamura. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Martin at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.