UFC Fight Night: Werdum vs. Volkov: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 17, 2018·London, England, United Kingdom
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Werdum vs. Volkov lands on Saturday, March 17, 2018 in London, England, United Kingdom with 10 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Alexander Volkov vs Fabricio WerdumHeavyweightAlexander VolkovLean57%
Jan Blachowicz vs Jimi ManuwaLight HeavyweightJimi ManuwaLean61%
Tom Duquesnoy vs Terrion WareBantamweightTom DuquesnoyStrong80%
Leon Edwards vs Peter SobottaWelterweightLeon EdwardsConfident68%
Charles Byrd vs John PhillipsMiddleweightJohn PhillipsLean58%
Danny Roberts vs Oliver EnkampWelterweightDanny RobertsLean57%
Danny Henry vs Hakeem DawoduFeatherweightHakeem DawoduLean64%
Paul Craig vs Magomed AnkalaevLight HeavyweightMagomed AnkalaevConfident71%
Kajan Johnson vs Stevie RayLightweightKajan JohnsonToss-up52%
Dmitry Sosnovskiy vs Mark GodbeerHeavyweightMark GodbeerToss-up52%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Alexander Volkov vs Fabricio Werdum

HeavyweightTitle Fight
57%
Alexander Volkov
Volkov
13-5
CH-I1856
All-Rounder
VS
Werdum
12-6
CH-III1625
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Heavyweight championship matchup features Alexander Volkov (13-5) taking on Fabricio Werdum (12-6). Volkov is the bigger frame at 6'7" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Volkov is rated at 1856 — 231 points above Werdum's 1625. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Volkov throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Volkov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Volkov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexander Volkov over Fabricio Werdum. The model gives Volkov a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Volkov at 35% implied while our model sees 57% — a 22-point disagreement that could signal value.

Jan Blachowicz vs Jimi Manuwa

Light Heavyweight
61%
Jimi Manuwa
Blachowicz
12-8-2
CH-II1703
All-Rounder
VS
Manuwa
6-6
RK-I1195
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jan Blachowicz (12-8-2) taking on Jimi Manuwa (6-6).

Blachowicz is rated at 1703 — 508 points above Manuwa's 1195. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Blachowicz's all-rounder game against Manuwa's knockout artist approach. Blachowicz is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Manuwa is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Blachowicz throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Blachowicz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Manuwa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jimi Manuwa over Jan Blachowicz. The model gives Manuwa a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Blachowicz at 27% implied while our model sees 39% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

80%
Tom Duquesnoy
Duquesnoy
2-1
RK-I1143
VS
Ware
0-4
UC-III636
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Bantamweight matchup features Tom Duquesnoy (2-1) taking on Terrion Ware (0-4). Ware will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Duquesnoy is rated at 1143 — 507 points above Ware's 636. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ware throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Duquesnoy is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Duquesnoy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tom Duquesnoy over Terrion Ware. The model is firm on this one: Duquesnoy at 80%. Notably, the betting market has Duquesnoy at 76% implied while our model sees 80% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

68%
Leon Edwards
Edwards
14-5
CH-II1747
All-Rounder
VS
Sobotta
4-6
RK-I1147
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Welterweight matchup features Leon Edwards (14-5) taking on Peter Sobotta (4-6).

Edwards is rated at 1747 — 600 points above Sobotta's 1147. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Edwards looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Sobotta is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 55% win rate against submission artists, giving Edwards the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sobotta throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Sobotta is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Sobotta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Leon Edwards over Peter Sobotta. We're leaning Edwards here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

58%
John Phillips
Byrd
1-3
UC-III624
VS
Phillips
1-5
PR-III801
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Middleweight matchup features Charles Byrd (1-3) taking on John Phillips (1-5).

Phillips is rated at 801 — 177 points above Byrd's 624. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Phillips throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Phillips is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Phillips has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Phillips over Charles Byrd. The model gives Phillips a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 48% for Byrd, but our model sees only 42%. That 7-point gap favoring Phillips is worth watching.

57%
Danny Roberts
Roberts
7-7
RK-III1018
All-Rounder
VS
Enkamp
0-2
PR-III822
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Welterweight matchup features Danny Roberts (7-7) taking on Oliver Enkamp (0-2). Enkamp will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Roberts is rated at 1018 — 196 points above Enkamp's 822. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roberts throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Enkamp is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Roberts has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Danny Roberts over Oliver Enkamp. The model gives Roberts a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 60% for Roberts, but our model sees only 57%. That 4-point gap favoring Enkamp is worth watching.

Danny Henry vs Hakeem Dawodu

Featherweight
64%
Hakeem Dawodu
Henry
2-2
MC-III928
VS
Dawodu
6-4
RK-I1159
Striker
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Featherweight matchup features Danny Henry (2-2) taking on Hakeem Dawodu (6-4). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Henry.

Dawodu is rated at 1159 — 231 points above Henry's 928. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Henry throws significantly more leather — a 6.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Henry is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Dawodu has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Hakeem Dawodu over Danny Henry. The model gives Dawodu a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Henry at 28% implied while our model sees 36% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

Paul Craig vs Magomed Ankalaev

Light Heavyweight
71%
Magomed Ankalaev
Craig
9-10-1
RK-I1180
Wrestler
VS
Ankalaev
12-2-1
CH-I1890
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Paul Craig (9-10-1) taking on Magomed Ankalaev (12-2-1).

Ankalaev is rated at 1890 — 710 points above Craig's 1180. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ankalaev has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Craig's wrestler game against Ankalaev's striker approach. Craig looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Ankalaev brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Craig throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Craig is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Ankalaev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Magomed Ankalaev over Paul Craig. We're leaning Ankalaev here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Craig at 16% implied while our model sees 29% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Kajan Johnson
Johnson
4-3
CO-III1280
All-Rounder
VS
Ray
7-4
CO-III1257
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Lightweight matchup features Kajan Johnson (4-3) taking on Stevie Ray (7-4). Johnson will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Johnson at 1280, Ray at 1257. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ray throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kajan Johnson over Stevie Ray. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Johnson at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Johnson at 37% implied while our model sees 52% — a 14-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Mark Godbeer
Sosnovskiy
1-0
RK-I1193
VS
Godbeer
2-2
PR-II865
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Dmitry Sosnovskiy (1-0) taking on Mark Godbeer (2-2).

Sosnovskiy is rated at 1193 — 328 points above Godbeer's 865. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Godbeer throws significantly more leather — a 4.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Godbeer is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Sosnovskiy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Godbeer over Dmitry Sosnovskiy. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Godbeer at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.