UFC Fight Night: Rodriguez vs. Penn: Predictions & Analysis

Sunday, January 15, 2017·Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Rodriguez vs. Penn lands on Sunday, January 15, 2017 in Phoenix, Arizona, USA with 12 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Yair Rodriguez vs BJ PennFeatherweightYair RodriguezStrong89%
Joe Lauzon vs Marcin HeldLightweightJoe LauzonToss-up55%
Ben Saunders vs Court McGeeWelterweightCourt McGeeConfident72%
Sergio Pettis vs John MoragaFlyweightSergio PettisConfident72%
Drakkar Klose vs Devin PowellLightweightDrakkar KloseStrong76%
Augusto Mendes vs Frankie SaenzBantamweightAugusto MendesToss-up52%
Aleksei Oleinik vs Viktor PestaHeavyweightViktor PestaToss-up50%
Anthony Rocco Martin vs Alex WhiteLightweightAnthony Rocco MartinToss-up54%
Nina Nunes vs Jocelyn Jones-LybargerWomen's StrawweightNina NunesToss-up55%
Walt Harris vs Chase ShermanHeavyweightWalt HarrisConfident67%
Joachim Christensen vs Bojan MihajlovicLight HeavyweightJoachim ChristensenConfident72%
Cyril Asker vs Dmitrii SmoliakovHeavyweightDmitrii SmoliakovToss-up51%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Yair Rodriguez vs BJ Penn

Featherweight
89%
Yair Rodriguez
Rodriguez
11-4
CH-II1705
All-Rounder
VS
Penn
12-13-2
RK-I1142
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Featherweight matchup features Yair Rodriguez (11-4) taking on BJ Penn (12-13-2).

Rodriguez is rated at 1705 — 564 points above Penn's 1142. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Rodriguez looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Rodriguez the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodriguez throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Rodriguez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Rodriguez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yair Rodriguez over BJ Penn. The model is firm on this one: Rodriguez at 89%.

Joe Lauzon vs Marcin Held

Lightweight
55%
Joe Lauzon
Lauzon
15-12
RK-II1099
All-Rounder
VS
Held
1-3
MC-II966
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Lightweight matchup features Joe Lauzon (15-12) taking on Marcin Held (1-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Lauzon at 1099 versus Held at 966. That 134-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lauzon throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Lauzon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Lauzon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joe Lauzon over Marcin Held. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Lauzon at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Ben Saunders vs Court McGee

Welterweight
72%
Court McGee
Saunders
9-10
MC-II937
All-Rounder
VS
McGee
11-13
RK-II1111
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Welterweight matchup features Ben Saunders (9-10) taking on Court McGee (11-13). Saunders is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

McGee is rated at 1111 — 175 points above Saunders's 937. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Saunders's knockout artist game against McGee's wrestler approach. Saunders is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while McGee looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. McGee throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. McGee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. McGee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Court McGee over Ben Saunders. We're leaning McGee here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 47% for Saunders, but our model sees only 28%. That 19-point gap favoring McGee is worth watching.

72%
Sergio Pettis
Pettis
9-5
CO-III1314
Striker
VS
Moraga
8-6
CO-III1225
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 66%
Under 34%Over 66%

The Flyweight matchup features Sergio Pettis (9-5) taking on John Moraga (8-6). Pettis will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Pettis at 1314 versus Moraga at 1225. That 90-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Moraga has won 3 straight.

The style clash matters here: Pettis is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Moraga looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Moraga the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pettis throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Pettis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Pettis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sergio Pettis over John Moraga. We're leaning Pettis here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Pettis at 57% implied while our model sees 72% — a 15-point disagreement that could signal value.

76%
Drakkar Klose
Klose
10-3
CO-I1473
Striker
VS
Powell
1-3
PR-II865
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Lightweight matchup features Drakkar Klose (10-3) taking on Devin Powell (1-3). Powell is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Klose is rated at 1473 — 608 points above Powell's 865. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Powell throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Powell is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Powell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Drakkar Klose over Devin Powell. The model is firm on this one: Klose at 76%. Notably, the betting market has Klose at 71% implied while our model sees 76% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Augusto Mendes
Mendes
1-2
RK-III1049
VS
Saenz
5-5
MC-III925
Striker
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Bantamweight matchup features Augusto Mendes (1-2) taking on Frankie Saenz (5-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Mendes at 1049 versus Saenz at 925. That 124-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Saenz throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Saenz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Mendes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Augusto Mendes over Frankie Saenz. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Mendes at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Mendes at 40% implied while our model sees 52% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

50%
Viktor Pesta
Oleinik
9-8
RK-I1176
Wrestler
VS
Pesta
1-4
UC-II674
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Aleksei Oleinik (9-8) taking on Viktor Pesta (1-4). Oleinik will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Oleinik is rated at 1176 — 503 points above Pesta's 674. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pesta throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Oleinik is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Pesta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Viktor Pesta over Aleksei Oleinik. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pesta at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 56% for Oleinik, but our model sees only 50%. That 6-point gap favoring Pesta is worth watching.

54%
Anthony Rocco Martin
Martin
9-6
CO-I1520
All-Rounder
VS
White
4-6
MC-II940
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Anthony Rocco Martin (9-6) taking on Alex White (4-6).

Martin is rated at 1520 — 580 points above White's 940. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Martin's wrestler game against White's knockout artist approach. Martin looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while White is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. White throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Martin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. White has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Rocco Martin over Alex White. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Martin at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Nina Nunes vs Jocelyn Jones-Lybarger

Women's Strawweight
55%
Nina Nunes
Nunes
5-4
CO-III1202
All-Rounder
VS
Jones-Lybarger
0-3
UC-III626
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Nina Nunes (5-4) taking on Jocelyn Jones-Lybarger (0-3).

Nunes is rated at 1202 — 577 points above Jones-Lybarger's 626. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nunes throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Jones-Lybarger is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jones-Lybarger has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nina Nunes over Jocelyn Jones-Lybarger. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nunes at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 58% for Nunes, but our model sees only 55%. That 3-point gap favoring Jones-Lybarger is worth watching.

67%
Walt Harris
Harris
6-9
CO-III1273
Striker
VS
Sherman
4-11
PR-II851
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Heavyweight matchup features Walt Harris (6-9) taking on Chase Sherman (4-11).

Harris is rated at 1273 — 423 points above Sherman's 851. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Harris's all-rounder game against Sherman's striker approach. Harris is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Sherman brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sherman throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Sherman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Harris has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Walt Harris over Chase Sherman. We're leaning Harris here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Harris at 56% implied while our model sees 67% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

72%
Joachim Christensen
Christensen
1-3
PR-III819
VS
Mihajlovic
0-3
UC-II678
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Joachim Christensen (1-3) taking on Bojan Mihajlovic (0-3). Christensen is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Christensen at 819 versus Mihajlovic at 678. That 142-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Christensen throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Mihajlovic is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Mihajlovic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joachim Christensen over Bojan Mihajlovic. We're leaning Christensen here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Christensen at 68% implied while our model sees 72% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

51%
Dmitrii Smoliakov
Asker
2-3
MC-III920
VS
Smoliakov
0-3
UC-III528
Over/UnderUnder 63%
Under 63%Over 37%

The Heavyweight matchup features Cyril Asker (2-3) taking on Dmitrii Smoliakov (0-3).

Asker is rated at 920 — 392 points above Smoliakov's 528. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Asker throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Smoliakov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Smoliakov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dmitrii Smoliakov over Cyril Asker. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Smoliakov at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.