UFC Fight Night: Lineker vs. Dodson: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 1, 2016·Portland, Oregon, USA
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Lineker vs. Dodson lands on Saturday, October 1, 2016 in Portland, Oregon, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
John Lineker vs John DodsonBantamweightJohn LinekerLean55%
Alex Oliveira vs Will BrooksLightweightWill BrooksToss-up53%
Zak Ottow vs Joshua BurkmanWelterweightZak OttowLean60%
Brandon Moreno vs Louis SmolkaFlyweightLouis SmolkaStrong85%
Henrique da Silva vs Joachim ChristensenLight HeavyweightHenrique da SilvaStrong80%
Andre Fili vs Hacran DiasFeatherweightAndre FiliLean60%
Shamil Abdurakhimov vs Walt HarrisHeavyweightShamil AbdurakhimovConfident66%
Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos vs Keita NakamuraWelterweightKeita NakamuraToss-up54%
Nate Marquardt vs Tamdan McCroryMiddleweightTamdan McCroryLean61%
Ion Cutelaba vs Jonathan WilsonLight HeavyweightIon CutelabaLean59%
Curtis Blaydes vs Cody EastHeavyweightCurtis BlaydesStrong80%
Ketlen Vieira vs Kelly FaszholzWomen's BantamweightKetlen VieiraLean57%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

John Lineker vs John Dodson

BantamweightTitle Fight
55%
John Lineker
Lineker
12-4
CO-I1549
All-Rounder
VS
Dodson
10-7
CO-II1376
Striker
Over/UnderOver 67%
Under 33%Over 67%

The Bantamweight championship matchup features John Lineker (12-4) taking on John Dodson (10-7).

Lineker is rated at 1549 — 173 points above Dodson's 1376. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Lineker is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Dodson brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Lineker the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lineker throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Dodson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Lineker has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Lineker over John Dodson. The model gives Lineker a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Lineker at 47% implied while our model sees 55% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

53%
Will Brooks
Oliveira
11-10
RK-II1099
All-Rounder
VS
Brooks
1-3
MC-II967
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Lightweight matchup features Alex Oliveira (11-10) taking on Will Brooks (1-3). Oliveira will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Oliveira at 1099 versus Brooks at 967. That 132-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brooks throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Oliveira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Brooks has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Will Brooks over Alex Oliveira. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Brooks at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Oliveira at 27% implied while our model sees 47% — a 19-point disagreement that could signal value.

Zak Ottow vs Joshua Burkman

Welterweight
60%
Zak Ottow
Ottow
4-4
RK-III1003
All-Rounder
VS
Burkman
6-12
PR-III816
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Welterweight matchup features Zak Ottow (4-4) taking on Joshua Burkman (6-12).

Ottow is rated at 1003 — 187 points above Burkman's 816. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Burkman throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Burkman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Ottow has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Zak Ottow over Joshua Burkman. The model gives Ottow a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

85%
Louis Smolka
Moreno
11-7-2
CO-II1417
All-Rounder
VS
Smolka
8-9
MC-II951
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Flyweight matchup features Brandon Moreno (11-7-2) taking on Louis Smolka (8-9).

Moreno is rated at 1417 — 466 points above Smolka's 951. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Moreno is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Smolka is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 55% win rate against all-rounders, giving Smolka the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Smolka throws significantly more leather — a 4.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Smolka is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Moreno has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Louis Smolka over Brandon Moreno. The model is firm on this one: Smolka at 85%. The market implies 20% for Moreno, but our model sees only 15%. That 5-point gap favoring Smolka is worth watching.

80%
Henrique da Silva
Silva
2-4
UC-I736
All-Rounder
VS
Christensen
1-3
PR-III819
Over/UnderUnder 66%
Under 66%Over 34%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Henrique da Silva (2-4) taking on Joachim Christensen (1-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Christensen at 819 versus Silva at 736. That 84-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 8.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Christensen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Christensen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Henrique da Silva over Joachim Christensen. The model is firm on this one: Silva at 80%.

Andre Fili vs Hacran Dias

Featherweight
60%
Andre Fili
Fili
13-12
RK-I1176
Striker
VS
Dias
3-5
RK-III1057
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Featherweight matchup features Andre Fili (13-12) taking on Hacran Dias (3-5). Fili is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Fili at 1176 versus Dias at 1057. That 119-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Fili looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Dias is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Fili the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fili throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Fili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Fili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Andre Fili over Hacran Dias. The model gives Fili a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Fili at 38% implied while our model sees 60% — a 22-point disagreement that could signal value.

66%
Shamil Abdurakhimov
Abdurakhimov
5-6
RK-I1135
Striker
VS
Harris
6-9
CO-III1273
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Heavyweight matchup features Shamil Abdurakhimov (5-6) taking on Walt Harris (6-9).

There's a real Elo separation here: Harris at 1273 versus Abdurakhimov at 1135. That 138-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Abdurakhimov throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Harris is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Harris has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Shamil Abdurakhimov over Walt Harris. We're leaning Abdurakhimov here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Abdurakhimov at 54% implied while our model sees 66% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

54%
Keita Nakamura
Santos
11-6-1
CO-III1215
All-Rounder
VS
Nakamura
4-7
RK-III1039
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Welterweight matchup features Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos (11-6-1) taking on Keita Nakamura (4-7).

Santos is rated at 1215 — 176 points above Nakamura's 1039. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Santos is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Nakamura looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Nakamura the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Nakamura is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Keita Nakamura over Elizeu Zaleski dos Santos. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nakamura at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

61%
Tamdan McCrory
Marquardt
13-12
RK-I1179
All-Rounder
VS
McCrory
4-5
RK-III1036
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Middleweight matchup features Nate Marquardt (13-12) taking on Tamdan McCrory (4-5). McCrory is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Marquardt at 1179 versus McCrory at 1036. That 144-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Marquardt is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while McCrory looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving McCrory the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marquardt throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. McCrory is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Marquardt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tamdan McCrory over Nate Marquardt. The model gives McCrory a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Marquardt at 33% implied while our model sees 39% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

Ion Cutelaba vs Jonathan Wilson

Light Heavyweight
59%
Ion Cutelaba
Cutelaba
9-10-1
CO-III1305
All-Rounder
VS
Wilson
1-3
UC-II733
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ion Cutelaba (9-10-1) taking on Jonathan Wilson (1-3).

Cutelaba is rated at 1305 — 572 points above Wilson's 733. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wilson throws significantly more leather — a 4.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Wilson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Cutelaba has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ion Cutelaba over Jonathan Wilson. The model gives Cutelaba a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

80%
Curtis Blaydes
Blaydes
14-5
CH-II1794
Striker
VS
East
0-2
UC-III581
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Heavyweight matchup features Curtis Blaydes (14-5) taking on Cody East (0-2).

Blaydes is rated at 1794 — 1214 points above East's 581. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. East throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Blaydes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Blaydes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Curtis Blaydes over Cody East. The model is firm on this one: Blaydes at 80%. Notably, the betting market has Blaydes at 68% implied while our model sees 80% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

Ketlen Vieira vs Kelly Faszholz

Women's Bantamweight
57%
Ketlen Vieira
Vieira
9-5
CO-II1352
Wrestler
VS
Faszholz
0-2
UC-III657
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Ketlen Vieira (9-5) taking on Kelly Faszholz (0-2).

Vieira is rated at 1352 — 695 points above Faszholz's 657. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Faszholz throws significantly more leather — a 5.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Faszholz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Vieira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ketlen Vieira over Kelly Faszholz. The model gives Vieira a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Vieira at 48% implied while our model sees 57% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.