UFC Fight Night: Jacare vs Mousasi: Predictions & Analysis

Friday, September 5, 2014·Ledyard, Connecticut, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Jacare vs Mousasi lands on Friday, September 5, 2014 in Ledyard, Connecticut, USA with 9 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jacare Souza vs Gegard MousasiMiddleweightJacare SouzaLean58%
Ben Rothwell vs Alistair OvereemHeavyweightBen RothwellLean60%
Matt Mitrione vs Derrick LewisHeavyweightDerrick LewisToss-up51%
Joe Lauzon vs Michael ChiesaLightweightMichael ChiesaLean65%
John Moraga vs Justin ScogginsFlyweightJustin ScogginsLean64%
Al Iaquinta vs Rodrigo DammLightweightAl IaquintaConfident70%
Rafael Natal vs Chris CamozziMiddleweightRafael NatalConfident69%
Chris Beal vs Tateki MatsudaBantamweightChris BealConfident72%
Chas Skelly vs Sean SorianoFeatherweightChas SkellyToss-up50%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

58%
Jacare Souza
Souza
9-7
CO-II1381
All-Rounder
VS
Mousasi
9-3
CH-I1837
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Middleweight matchup features Jacare Souza (9-7) taking on Gegard Mousasi (9-3). Mousasi will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Mousasi is rated at 1837 — 456 points above Souza's 1381. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Mousasi has won 4 straight.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mousasi throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Souza is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Mousasi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jacare Souza over Gegard Mousasi. The model gives Souza a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

60%
Ben Rothwell
Rothwell
9-8
CO-III1220
All-Rounder
VS
Overeem
12-8
CO-I1572
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Heavyweight matchup features Ben Rothwell (9-8) taking on Alistair Overeem (12-8).

Overeem is rated at 1572 — 352 points above Rothwell's 1220. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Rothwell's all-rounder game against Overeem's striker approach. Rothwell is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Overeem brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Overeem throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Rothwell is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Overeem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ben Rothwell over Alistair Overeem. The model gives Rothwell a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Derrick Lewis
Mitrione
9-5
CO-III1333
Striker
VS
Lewis
20-11
CO-I1493
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 67%
Under 67%Over 33%

The Heavyweight matchup features Matt Mitrione (9-5) taking on Derrick Lewis (20-11). Mitrione will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Lewis is rated at 1493 — 161 points above Mitrione's 1333. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lewis throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Lewis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.8 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Derrick Lewis over Matt Mitrione. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Lewis at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

65%
Michael Chiesa
Lauzon
15-12
RK-II1099
All-Rounder
VS
Chiesa
15-7
CO-I1566
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Lightweight matchup features Joe Lauzon (15-12) taking on Michael Chiesa (15-7). Chiesa is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Chiesa is rated at 1566 — 467 points above Lauzon's 1099. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lauzon throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Chiesa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Chiesa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Chiesa over Joe Lauzon. The model gives Chiesa a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

64%
Justin Scoggins
Moraga
8-6
CO-III1225
Wrestler
VS
Scoggins
4-5
PR-I872
Striker
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Flyweight matchup features John Moraga (8-6) taking on Justin Scoggins (4-5).

Moraga is rated at 1225 — 352 points above Scoggins's 872. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Moraga rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Moraga's all-rounder game against Scoggins's striker approach. Moraga is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Scoggins brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Scoggins throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Scoggins is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.9 more per 15 minutes. Scoggins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Justin Scoggins over John Moraga. The model gives Scoggins a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

70%
Al Iaquinta
Iaquinta
9-6
CO-II1361
Striker
VS
Damm
3-4
MC-III932
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Lightweight matchup features Al Iaquinta (9-6) taking on Rodrigo Damm (3-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Iaquinta.

Iaquinta is rated at 1361 — 429 points above Damm's 932. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Iaquinta throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Iaquinta is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Iaquinta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Al Iaquinta over Rodrigo Damm. We're leaning Iaquinta here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

69%
Rafael Natal
Natal
9-7-1
RK-III1035
Wrestler
VS
Camozzi
9-10
RK-III1038
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Middleweight matchup features Rafael Natal (9-7-1) taking on Chris Camozzi (9-10).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Natal at 1035, Camozzi at 1038. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Natal looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Camozzi is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Natal the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Camozzi throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Natal is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Natal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafael Natal over Chris Camozzi. We're leaning Natal here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Chris Beal vs Tateki Matsuda

Bantamweight
72%
Chris Beal
Beal
2-3
UC-I754
VS
Matsuda
0-2
PR-III823
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Bantamweight matchup features Chris Beal (2-3) taking on Tateki Matsuda (0-2).

Matsuda carries a modest Elo edge (823 to 754), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Beal throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Matsuda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Matsuda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Beal over Tateki Matsuda. We're leaning Beal here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Chas Skelly vs Sean Soriano

Featherweight
50%
Chas Skelly
Skelly
8-3
CO-III1303
Wrestler
VS
Soriano
0-5
UC-III625
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Featherweight matchup features Chas Skelly (8-3) taking on Sean Soriano (0-5). Skelly is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Skelly is rated at 1303 — 678 points above Soriano's 625. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Soriano throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Skelly is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Skelly has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chas Skelly over Sean Soriano. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Skelly at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.