UFC Fight Night: Kim vs Hathaway: Predictions & Analysis
UFC Fight Night: Kim vs Hathaway lands on Saturday, March 1, 2014 in Macau, China with 8 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dong Hyun Kim vs John HathawayWelterweight | Dong Hyun Kim | Lean | 62% |
| Zhang Lipeng vs Sai WangWelterweight | Sai Wang | Toss-up | 51% |
| Matt Mitrione vs Shawn JordanHeavyweight | Matt Mitrione | Toss-up | 54% |
| Hatsu Hioki vs Ivan MenjivarFeatherweight | Hatsu Hioki | Confident | 73% |
| Yui Chul Nam vs Kazuki TokudomeLightweight | Kazuki Tokudome | Confident | 70% |
| Vaughan Lee vs Nam PhanBantamweight | Vaughan Lee | Strong | 77% |
| Anying Wang vs Albert ChengWelterweight | Anying Wang | Toss-up | 54% |
| Mark Eddiva vs Jumabieke TuerxunFeatherweight | Jumabieke Tuerxun | Toss-up | 54% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
Dong Hyun Kim vs John Hathaway
The Welterweight matchup features Dong Hyun Kim (13-4) taking on John Hathaway (7-2).
There's a real Elo separation here: Kim at 1471 versus Hathaway at 1351. That 120-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Both fighters bring momentum: Kim rides a 3-fight win streak into this one, while Hathaway has won 3 straight.
The style clash matters here: Kim looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Hathaway is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Kim the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Hathaway throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Kim is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Kim has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Dong Hyun Kim over John Hathaway. The model gives Kim a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.
Zhang Lipeng vs Sai Wang
The Welterweight matchup features Zhang Lipeng (2-2) taking on Sai Wang (1-1).
Wang is rated at 1041 — 204 points above Lipeng's 837. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Wang throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Wang is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Wang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Sai Wang over Zhang Lipeng. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Wang at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Matt Mitrione vs Shawn Jordan
The Heavyweight matchup features Matt Mitrione (9-5) taking on Shawn Jordan (6-4). Mitrione is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 7-inch reach advantage.
There's a real Elo separation here: Mitrione at 1333 versus Jordan at 1200. That 133-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Jordan has won 3 straight.
Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Jordan throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Jordan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Matt Mitrione over Shawn Jordan. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Mitrione at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Hatsu Hioki vs Ivan Menjivar
The Featherweight matchup features Hatsu Hioki (3-5) taking on Ivan Menjivar (4-5). Hioki is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 9-inch reach advantage.
Menjivar carries a modest Elo edge (958 to 907), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
The style clash matters here: Hioki is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Menjivar looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Menjivar the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Menjivar throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Hioki is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Hioki has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Hatsu Hioki over Ivan Menjivar. We're leaning Hioki here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Yui Chul Nam vs Kazuki Tokudome
The Lightweight matchup features Yui Chul Nam (1-2) taking on Kazuki Tokudome (1-3).
Nam carries a modest Elo edge (832 to 779), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
A few statistical edges stand out. Tokudome throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Tokudome is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Nam has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Kazuki Tokudome over Yui Chul Nam. We're leaning Tokudome here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Vaughan Lee vs Nam Phan
The Bantamweight matchup features Vaughan Lee (3-5) taking on Nam Phan (2-6). Phan will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.
Lee carries a modest Elo edge (907 to 857), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
Stylistically this is Lee's wrestler game against Phan's striker approach. Lee looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Phan brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Phan throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Lee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Phan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Vaughan Lee over Nam Phan. The model is firm on this one: Lee at 77%.
Anying Wang vs Albert Cheng
The Welterweight matchup features Anying Wang (1-1) taking on Albert Cheng (0-1).
There's a real Elo separation here: Wang at 904 versus Cheng at 809. That 95-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
A few statistical edges stand out. Cheng throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Cheng is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cheng has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Anying Wang over Albert Cheng. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Wang at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Mark Eddiva vs Jumabieke Tuerxun
The Featherweight matchup features Mark Eddiva (1-3) taking on Jumabieke Tuerxun (0-3).
Eddiva is rated at 794 — 175 points above Tuerxun's 618. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Tuerxun throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Tuerxun is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Tuerxun has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jumabieke Tuerxun over Mark Eddiva. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Tuerxun at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.