UFC 169: Barao vs Faber 2: Predictions & Analysis
UFC 169: Barao vs Faber 2 lands on Saturday, February 1, 2014 in Newark, New Jersey, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renan Barao vs Urijah FaberBantamweight | Renan Barao | Confident | 69% |
| Jose Aldo vs Ricardo LamasFeatherweight | Jose Aldo | Lean | 62% |
| Alistair Overeem vs Frank MirHeavyweight | Alistair Overeem | Lean | 58% |
| Ali Bagautinov vs John LinekerFlyweight | John Lineker | Toss-up | 52% |
| Abel Trujillo vs Jamie VarnerLightweight | Jamie Varner | Lean | 55% |
| Alan Patrick vs John MakdessiLightweight | Alan Patrick | Lean | 62% |
| Chris Cariaso vs Danny MartinezFlyweight | Chris Cariaso | Lean | 56% |
| Nick Catone vs Tom WatsonMiddleweight | Nick Catone | Toss-up | 53% |
| Al Iaquinta vs Kevin LeeLightweight | Al Iaquinta | Confident | 73% |
| Clint Hester vs Andy EnzMiddleweight | Clint Hester | Lean | 56% |
| Rashid Magomedov vs Anthony Rocco MartinLightweight | Anthony Rocco Martin | Lean | 62% |
| Neil Magny vs Gasan UmalatovWelterweight | Neil Magny | Strong | 75% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
Renan Barao vs Urijah Faber
The Bantamweight matchup features Renan Barao (9-8) taking on Urijah Faber (11-7). Barao will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.
Faber is rated at 1433 — 460 points above Barao's 973. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
The style clash matters here: Barao is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Faber looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Faber the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Barao throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Faber is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Barao has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Renan Barao over Urijah Faber. We're leaning Barao here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Jose Aldo vs Ricardo Lamas
The Featherweight championship matchup features Jose Aldo (14-9) taking on Ricardo Lamas (11-6).
There's a real Elo separation here: Aldo at 1541 versus Lamas at 1401. That 140-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Aldo throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Lamas is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Aldo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jose Aldo over Ricardo Lamas. The model gives Aldo a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.
Alistair Overeem vs Frank Mir
The Heavyweight matchup features Alistair Overeem (12-8) taking on Frank Mir (16-11).
Overeem is rated at 1572 — 204 points above Mir's 1367. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Stylistically this is Overeem's striker game against Mir's submission artist approach. Overeem brings a versatile approach, while Mir is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Overeem throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Mir is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Overeem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Alistair Overeem over Frank Mir. The model gives Overeem a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.
Ali Bagautinov vs John Lineker
The Flyweight matchup features Ali Bagautinov (4-3) taking on John Lineker (12-4).
Lineker is rated at 1549 — 292 points above Bagautinov's 1257. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Stylistically this is Bagautinov's wrestler game against Lineker's striker approach. Bagautinov looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Lineker brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Lineker throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Bagautinov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Bagautinov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: John Lineker over Ali Bagautinov. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Lineker at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Abel Trujillo vs Jamie Varner
The Lightweight matchup features Abel Trujillo (6-4) taking on Jamie Varner (3-6).
Trujillo is rated at 1107 — 310 points above Varner's 797. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
The style clash matters here: Trujillo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Varner looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Varner the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Trujillo throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Varner is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Trujillo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jamie Varner over Abel Trujillo. The model gives Varner a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.
Alan Patrick vs John Makdessi
The Lightweight matchup features Alan Patrick (5-4) taking on John Makdessi (11-9). Patrick is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 6-inch reach advantage.
There's a real Elo separation here: Makdessi at 1080 versus Patrick at 943. That 138-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
Stylistically this is Patrick's wrestler game against Makdessi's striker approach. Patrick looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Makdessi brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Makdessi throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Patrick is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.9 more per 15 minutes. Patrick has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Alan Patrick over John Makdessi. The model gives Patrick a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.
Chris Cariaso vs Danny Martinez
The Flyweight matchup features Chris Cariaso (7-6) taking on Danny Martinez (1-3). Martinez is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
Cariaso is rated at 1015 — 155 points above Martinez's 860. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Cariaso throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Cariaso is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Martinez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Chris Cariaso over Danny Martinez. The model gives Cariaso a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.
Nick Catone vs Tom Watson
The Middleweight matchup features Nick Catone (4-4) taking on Tom Watson (2-5).
There's a real Elo separation here: Catone at 1023 versus Watson at 880. That 143-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
Stylistically this is Catone's wrestler game against Watson's striker approach. Catone looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Watson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Watson throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Catone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Catone has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Nick Catone over Tom Watson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Catone at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Al Iaquinta vs Kevin Lee
The Lightweight matchup features Al Iaquinta (9-6) taking on Kevin Lee (11-8). Lee will look to use a 7-inch reach edge to control distance.
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Iaquinta at 1361, Lee at 1373. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.
Stylistically this is Iaquinta's striker game against Lee's wrestler approach. Iaquinta brings a versatile approach, while Lee looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Iaquinta throws significantly more leather — a 5.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Iaquinta is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Lee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Al Iaquinta over Kevin Lee. We're leaning Iaquinta here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Clint Hester vs Andy Enz
The Middleweight matchup features Clint Hester (4-3) taking on Andy Enz (0-3).
Hester is rated at 946 — 193 points above Enz's 754. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Hester throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Hester is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Enz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Clint Hester over Andy Enz. The model gives Hester a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.
Rashid Magomedov vs Anthony Rocco Martin
The Lightweight matchup features Rashid Magomedov (5-1) taking on Anthony Rocco Martin (9-6). Martin is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Magomedov at 1525, Martin at 1520. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.
Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Martin throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Martin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Martin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Anthony Rocco Martin over Rashid Magomedov. The model gives Martin a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.
Neil Magny vs Gasan Umalatov
The Welterweight matchup features Neil Magny (24-13) taking on Gasan Umalatov (1-3). Magny is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 9-inch reach advantage.
Magny is rated at 1418 — 562 points above Umalatov's 856. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Magny throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Magny is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Umalatov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Neil Magny over Gasan Umalatov. The model is firm on this one: Magny at 75%.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.