UFC 166: Velasquez vs Dos Santos 3: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 19, 2013·Houston, Texas, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 166: Velasquez vs Dos Santos 3 lands on Saturday, October 19, 2013 in Houston, Texas, USA with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Cain Velasquez vs Junior Dos SantosHeavyweightCain VelasquezToss-up55%
Daniel Cormier vs Roy NelsonHeavyweightDaniel CormierConfident68%
Gilbert Melendez vs Diego SanchezLightweightDiego SanchezLean61%
Gabriel Gonzaga vs Shawn JordanHeavyweightGabriel GonzagaToss-up54%
John Dodson vs Darrell MontagueFlyweightJohn DodsonToss-up52%
Tim Boetsch vs CB DollawayMiddleweightTim BoetschToss-up53%
Hector Lombard vs Nate MarquardtWelterweightNate MarquardtLean58%
Sarah Kaufman vs Jessica EyeWomen's BantamweightJessica EyeToss-up54%
KJ Noons vs George SotiropoulosLightweightGeorge SotiropoulosToss-up51%
Adlan Amagov vs TJ WaldburgerWelterweightAdlan AmagovConfident67%
Tony Ferguson vs Mike RioLightweightTony FergusonLean58%
Andre Fili vs Jeremy LarsenFeatherweightAndre FiliLean60%
Kyoji Horiguchi vs Dustin PagueBantamweightDustin PagueToss-up50%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Cain Velasquez vs Junior Dos Santos

HeavyweightTitle Fight
55%
Cain Velasquez
Velasquez
12-2
Elo 1589
Submission Artist
VS
Santos
15-7
Elo 1191
Striker

The Heavyweight championship matchup features Cain Velasquez (12-2) taking on Junior Dos Santos (15-7). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Santos.

Velasquez is rated at 1589 — 398 points above Santos's 1191. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Velasquez throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Velasquez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.8 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cain Velasquez over Junior Dos Santos. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Velasquez at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

68%
Daniel Cormier
Cormier
11-2
Elo 1835
All-Rounder
VS
Nelson
9-9
Elo 1129
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Daniel Cormier (11-2) taking on Roy Nelson (9-9).

Cormier is rated at 1835 — 706 points above Nelson's 1129. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Cormier's all-rounder game against Nelson's knockout artist approach. Cormier is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Nelson is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cormier throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cormier has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daniel Cormier over Roy Nelson. We're leaning Cormier here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

61%
Diego Sanchez
Melendez
1-5
Elo 976
Striker
VS
Sanchez
19-12
Elo 1139
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Gilbert Melendez (1-5) taking on Diego Sanchez (19-12).

Sanchez is rated at 1139 — 163 points above Melendez's 976. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Melendez's striker game against Sanchez's all-rounder approach. Melendez brings a versatile approach, while Sanchez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sanchez throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Sanchez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Melendez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Sanchez over Gilbert Melendez. The model gives Sanchez a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

54%
Gabriel Gonzaga
Gonzaga
12-9
Elo 967
All-Rounder
VS
Jordan
6-3
Elo 1164
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Gabriel Gonzaga (12-9) taking on Shawn Jordan (6-3).

Jordan is rated at 1164 — 198 points above Gonzaga's 967. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Jordan has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Gonzaga's submission artist game against Jordan's striker approach. Gonzaga is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Jordan brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jordan throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Gonzaga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gabriel Gonzaga over Shawn Jordan. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Gonzaga at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

52%
John Dodson
Dodson
10-6
Elo 1256
Striker
VS
Montague
0-2
Elo 773

The Flyweight matchup features John Dodson (10-6) taking on Darrell Montague (0-2). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Montague.

Dodson is rated at 1256 — 483 points above Montague's 773. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dodson throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Dodson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Montague has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Dodson over Darrell Montague. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dodson at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Tim Boetsch vs CB Dollaway

Middleweight
53%
Tim Boetsch
Boetsch
12-11
Elo 1174
Striker
VS
Dollaway
11-8
Elo 965
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Tim Boetsch (12-11) taking on CB Dollaway (11-8). Dollaway is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Boetsch is rated at 1174 — 209 points above Dollaway's 965. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Boetsch throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollaway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Dollaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tim Boetsch over CB Dollaway. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Boetsch at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Nate Marquardt
Lombard
3-7
Elo 964
All-Rounder
VS
Marquardt
13-11
Elo 1064
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Hector Lombard (3-7) taking on Nate Marquardt (13-11). Marquardt is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Marquardt at 1064 versus Lombard at 964. That 100-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Lombard's all-rounder game against Marquardt's knockout artist approach. Lombard is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Marquardt is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lombard throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Marquardt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Marquardt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nate Marquardt over Hector Lombard. The model gives Marquardt a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Sarah Kaufman vs Jessica Eye

Women's Bantamweight
54%
Jessica Eye
Kaufman
1-1
Elo 915
VS
Eye
5-9
Elo 950
Striker

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Sarah Kaufman (1-1) taking on Jessica Eye (5-9).

Eye carries a modest Elo edge (950 to 915), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Eye throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Eye is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Eye has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jessica Eye over Sarah Kaufman. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Eye at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

51%
George Sotiropoulos
Noons
2-2
Elo 887
VS
Sotiropoulos
7-3
Elo 918
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features KJ Noons (2-2) taking on George Sotiropoulos (7-3).

Sotiropoulos carries a modest Elo edge (918 to 887), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sotiropoulos throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Sotiropoulos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Sotiropoulos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: George Sotiropoulos over KJ Noons. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sotiropoulos at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
Adlan Amagov
Amagov
1-0
Elo 1265
VS
Waldburger
4-3
Elo 1008
Submission Artist

The Welterweight matchup features Adlan Amagov (1-0) taking on TJ Waldburger (4-3). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Amagov.

Amagov is rated at 1265 — 257 points above Waldburger's 1008. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Amagov throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Amagov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Amagov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Adlan Amagov over TJ Waldburger. We're leaning Amagov here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Tony Ferguson vs Mike Rio

Lightweight
58%
Tony Ferguson
Ferguson
15-8
Elo 1065
All-Rounder
VS
Rio
1-2
Elo 818

The Lightweight matchup features Tony Ferguson (15-8) taking on Mike Rio (1-2). Ferguson will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ferguson is rated at 1065 — 247 points above Rio's 818. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferguson throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Rio is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Ferguson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tony Ferguson over Mike Rio. The model gives Ferguson a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Andre Fili vs Jeremy Larsen

Featherweight
60%
Andre Fili
Fili
12-11
Elo 1140
Striker
VS
Larsen
0-2
Elo 711

The Featherweight matchup features Andre Fili (12-11) taking on Jeremy Larsen (0-2). Fili will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Fili is rated at 1140 — 429 points above Larsen's 711. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Larsen throws significantly more leather — a 5.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Larsen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Fili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Andre Fili over Jeremy Larsen. The model gives Fili a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

50%
Dustin Pague
Horiguchi
8-1
Elo 1528
All-Rounder
VS
Pague
1-4
Elo 755
Wrestler

The Bantamweight matchup features Kyoji Horiguchi (8-1) taking on Dustin Pague (1-4). Pague is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 11-inch reach advantage.

Horiguchi is rated at 1528 — 772 points above Pague's 755. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Horiguchi rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Horiguchi is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Pague looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Pague the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pague throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Pague is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Horiguchi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dustin Pague over Kyoji Horiguchi. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pague at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC 166: Velasquez vs Dos Santos 3 Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker