UFC 166: Velasquez vs Dos Santos 3: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 19, 2013·Houston, Texas, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 166: Velasquez vs Dos Santos 3 lands on Saturday, October 19, 2013 in Houston, Texas, USA with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Cain Velasquez vs Junior Dos SantosHeavyweightCain VelasquezLean65%
Daniel Cormier vs Roy NelsonHeavyweightDaniel CormierConfident71%
Gilbert Melendez vs Diego SanchezLightweightDiego SanchezLean56%
Gabriel Gonzaga vs Shawn JordanHeavyweightShawn JordanToss-up54%
John Dodson vs Darrell MontagueFlyweightJohn DodsonToss-up52%
Tim Boetsch vs CB DollawayMiddleweightTim BoetschLean56%
Hector Lombard vs Nate MarquardtWelterweightNate MarquardtLean56%
Sarah Kaufman vs Jessica EyeWomen's BantamweightJessica EyeLean55%
KJ Noons vs George SotiropoulosLightweightGeorge SotiropoulosToss-up52%
Adlan Amagov vs TJ WaldburgerWelterweightAdlan AmagovConfident71%
Tony Ferguson vs Mike RioLightweightTony FergusonConfident69%
Andre Fili vs Jeremy LarsenFeatherweightAndre FiliLean62%
Kyoji Horiguchi vs Dustin PagueBantamweightDustin PagueToss-up53%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Cain Velasquez vs Junior Dos Santos

HeavyweightTitle Fight
65%
Cain Velasquez
Velasquez
12-3
CH-II1747
Knockout Artist
VS
Santos
15-8
CO-II1427
Striker
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Heavyweight championship matchup features Cain Velasquez (12-3) taking on Junior Dos Santos (15-8). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Santos.

Velasquez is rated at 1747 — 320 points above Santos's 1427. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Velasquez throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Velasquez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.8 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cain Velasquez over Junior Dos Santos. The model gives Velasquez a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

71%
Daniel Cormier
Cormier
11-3
CH-I1991
All-Rounder
VS
Nelson
9-10
CO-III1242
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 66%
Under 66%Over 34%

The Heavyweight matchup features Daniel Cormier (11-3) taking on Roy Nelson (9-10).

Cormier is rated at 1991 — 749 points above Nelson's 1242. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Cormier's all-rounder game against Nelson's knockout artist approach. Cormier is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Nelson is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cormier throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cormier has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daniel Cormier over Roy Nelson. We're leaning Cormier here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

56%
Diego Sanchez
Melendez
1-6
RK-III1017
Striker
VS
Sanchez
19-13
CO-III1216
Striker
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Lightweight matchup features Gilbert Melendez (1-6) taking on Diego Sanchez (19-13).

Sanchez is rated at 1216 — 200 points above Melendez's 1017. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Melendez's striker game against Sanchez's all-rounder approach. Melendez brings a versatile approach, while Sanchez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sanchez throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Sanchez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Melendez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Sanchez over Gilbert Melendez. The model gives Sanchez a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

54%
Shawn Jordan
Gonzaga
12-10
RK-II1072
All-Rounder
VS
Jordan
6-4
RK-I1200
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Heavyweight matchup features Gabriel Gonzaga (12-10) taking on Shawn Jordan (6-4).

There's a real Elo separation here: Jordan at 1200 versus Gonzaga at 1072. That 128-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Jordan has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Gonzaga's submission artist game against Jordan's striker approach. Gonzaga is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Jordan brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jordan throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Gonzaga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Shawn Jordan over Gabriel Gonzaga. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jordan at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

52%
John Dodson
Dodson
10-7
CO-II1376
Striker
VS
Montague
0-3
UC-II694
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Flyweight matchup features John Dodson (10-7) taking on Darrell Montague (0-3). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Montague.

Dodson is rated at 1376 — 681 points above Montague's 694. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dodson throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Dodson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Montague has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Dodson over Darrell Montague. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dodson at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Tim Boetsch vs CB Dollaway

Middleweight
56%
Tim Boetsch
Boetsch
12-12
CO-III1280
Striker
VS
Dollaway
11-9
RK-II1099
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Middleweight matchup features Tim Boetsch (12-12) taking on CB Dollaway (11-9). Dollaway is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Boetsch is rated at 1280 — 180 points above Dollaway's 1099. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Boetsch throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollaway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Dollaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tim Boetsch over CB Dollaway. The model gives Boetsch a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Nate Marquardt
Lombard
3-8
RK-II1079
All-Rounder
VS
Marquardt
13-12
RK-I1179
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Welterweight matchup features Hector Lombard (3-8) taking on Nate Marquardt (13-12). Marquardt is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Marquardt at 1179 versus Lombard at 1079. That 101-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Lombard's all-rounder game against Marquardt's knockout artist approach. Lombard is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Marquardt is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lombard throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Marquardt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Marquardt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nate Marquardt over Hector Lombard. The model gives Marquardt a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Sarah Kaufman vs Jessica Eye

Women's Bantamweight
55%
Jessica Eye
Kaufman
1-2
PR-I879
VS
Eye
5-10
RK-III1060
Striker
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Sarah Kaufman (1-2) taking on Jessica Eye (5-10).

Eye is rated at 1060 — 181 points above Kaufman's 879. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Eye throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Eye is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Eye has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jessica Eye over Sarah Kaufman. The model gives Eye a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

52%
George Sotiropoulos
Noons
2-3
MC-III907
VS
Sotiropoulos
7-4
MC-II965
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Lightweight matchup features KJ Noons (2-3) taking on George Sotiropoulos (7-4).

Sotiropoulos carries a modest Elo edge (965 to 907), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sotiropoulos throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Sotiropoulos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Sotiropoulos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: George Sotiropoulos over KJ Noons. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sotiropoulos at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

71%
Adlan Amagov
Amagov
2-0
CO-II1434
VS
Waldburger
4-4
RK-II1107
Submission Artist
Over/UnderUnder 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Welterweight matchup features Adlan Amagov (2-0) taking on TJ Waldburger (4-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Amagov.

Amagov is rated at 1434 — 327 points above Waldburger's 1107. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Amagov throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Amagov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Amagov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Adlan Amagov over TJ Waldburger. We're leaning Amagov here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Tony Ferguson vs Mike Rio

Lightweight
69%
Tony Ferguson
Ferguson
15-9
CO-III1255
All-Rounder
VS
Rio
1-3
UC-I762
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Lightweight matchup features Tony Ferguson (15-9) taking on Mike Rio (1-3). Ferguson will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ferguson is rated at 1255 — 493 points above Rio's 762. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferguson throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Rio is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Ferguson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tony Ferguson over Mike Rio. We're leaning Ferguson here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Andre Fili vs Jeremy Larsen

Featherweight
62%
Andre Fili
Fili
13-12
RK-I1176
Striker
VS
Larsen
0-3
UC-III627
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Featherweight matchup features Andre Fili (13-12) taking on Jeremy Larsen (0-3). Fili will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Fili is rated at 1176 — 549 points above Larsen's 627. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Larsen throws significantly more leather — a 5.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Larsen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Fili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Andre Fili over Jeremy Larsen. The model gives Fili a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

53%
Dustin Pague
Horiguchi
9-1
CO-I1584
All-Rounder
VS
Pague
1-5
UC-I737
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Bantamweight matchup features Kyoji Horiguchi (9-1) taking on Dustin Pague (1-5). Pague is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 11-inch reach advantage.

Horiguchi is rated at 1584 — 847 points above Pague's 737. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Horiguchi rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Horiguchi is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Pague looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Pague the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pague throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Pague is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Horiguchi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dustin Pague over Kyoji Horiguchi. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pague at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.