UFC 163: Aldo vs Jung: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 3, 2013·Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 163: Aldo vs Jung lands on Saturday, August 3, 2013 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jose Aldo vs Chan Sung JungFeatherweightJose AldoToss-up54%
Phil Davis vs Lyoto MachidaLight HeavyweightPhil DavisConfident68%
Cezar Ferreira vs Thiago SantosMiddleweightCezar FerreiraLean61%
Thales Leites vs Tom WatsonMiddleweightThales LeitesLean57%
John Lineker vs Jose MariaFlyweightJohn LinekerStrong84%
Anthony Perosh vs Vinny MagalhaesLight HeavyweightVinny MagalhaesLean57%
Amanda Nunes vs Sheila GaffWomen's BantamweightSheila GaffToss-up52%
Sergio Moraes vs Neil MagnyWelterweightNeil MagnyConfident66%
Ian McCall vs Iliarde SantosFlyweightIan McCallConfident68%
Rani Yahya vs Josh CloptonFeatherweightRani YahyaConfident70%
Francimar Barroso vs Ednaldo OliveiraLight HeavyweightFrancimar BarrosoToss-up54%
Viscardi Andrade vs Bristol MarundeWelterweightViscardi AndradeLean56%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jose Aldo vs Chan Sung Jung

FeatherweightTitle Fight
54%
Jose Aldo
Aldo
14-8
Elo 1420
All-Rounder
VS
Jung
7-4
Elo 1528
All-Rounder

The Featherweight championship matchup features Jose Aldo (14-8) taking on Chan Sung Jung (7-4).

There's a real Elo separation here: Jung at 1528 versus Aldo at 1420. That 108-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jung throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Jung is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Aldo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jose Aldo over Chan Sung Jung. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Aldo at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Phil Davis vs Lyoto Machida

Light Heavyweight
68%
Phil Davis
Davis
9-2
Elo 1427
Wrestler
VS
Machida
15-8
Elo 1493
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Phil Davis (9-2) taking on Lyoto Machida (15-8). Davis will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Machida carries a modest Elo edge (1493 to 1427), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Davis looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Machida is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Davis the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Davis throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Davis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Phil Davis over Lyoto Machida. We're leaning Davis here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

61%
Cezar Ferreira
Ferreira
9-5
Elo 1033
Wrestler
VS
Santos
14-9
Elo 1292
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Cezar Ferreira (9-5) taking on Thiago Santos (14-9).

Santos is rated at 1292 — 260 points above Ferreira's 1033. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Ferreira's wrestler game against Santos's striker approach. Ferreira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Santos brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferreira throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cezar Ferreira over Thiago Santos. The model gives Ferreira a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Thales Leites vs Tom Watson

Middleweight
57%
Thales Leites
Leites
12-8
Elo 1176
Wrestler
VS
Watson
2-4
Elo 868
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Thales Leites (12-8) taking on Tom Watson (2-4). Leites will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Leites is rated at 1176 — 308 points above Watson's 868. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Leites's wrestler game against Watson's striker approach. Leites looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Watson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Watson throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Leites is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.3 more per 15 minutes. Watson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thales Leites over Tom Watson. The model gives Leites a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

84%
John Lineker
Lineker
12-3
Elo 1455
All-Rounder
VS
Maria
0-1
Elo 808

The Flyweight matchup features John Lineker (12-3) taking on Jose Maria (0-1).

Lineker is rated at 1455 — 647 points above Maria's 808. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lineker throws significantly more leather — a 6.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Maria is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Maria has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Lineker over Jose Maria. The model is firm on this one: Lineker at 84%.

Anthony Perosh vs Vinny Magalhaes

Light Heavyweight
57%
Vinny Magalhaes
Perosh
5-6
Elo 872
Submission Artist
VS
Magalhaes
1-3
Elo 885

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Anthony Perosh (5-6) taking on Vinny Magalhaes (1-3).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Perosh at 872, Magalhaes at 885. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perosh throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Perosh is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Magalhaes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Vinny Magalhaes over Anthony Perosh. The model gives Magalhaes a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Amanda Nunes vs Sheila Gaff

Women's Bantamweight
52%
Sheila Gaff
Nunes
15-2
Elo 1636
Wrestler
VS
Gaff
0-1
Elo 790

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Amanda Nunes (15-2) taking on Sheila Gaff (0-1).

Nunes is rated at 1636 — 846 points above Gaff's 790. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gaff throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Gaff is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nunes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sheila Gaff over Amanda Nunes. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Gaff at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Sergio Moraes vs Neil Magny

Welterweight
66%
Neil Magny
Moraes
8-4-1
Elo 1097
All-Rounder
VS
Magny
24-12
Elo 1270
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features Sergio Moraes (8-4-1) taking on Neil Magny (24-12). Magny is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

Magny is rated at 1270 — 174 points above Moraes's 1097. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Moraes is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Magny looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Magny the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Magny throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Magny is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Magny has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Neil Magny over Sergio Moraes. We're leaning Magny here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

68%
Ian McCall
McCall
2-2-1
Elo 1042
Striker
VS
Santos
0-2
Elo 720

The Flyweight matchup features Ian McCall (2-2-1) taking on Iliarde Santos (0-2). Santos will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

McCall is rated at 1042 — 322 points above Santos's 720. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. McCall throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. McCall is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. McCall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ian McCall over Iliarde Santos. We're leaning McCall here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Rani Yahya vs Josh Clopton

Featherweight
70%
Rani Yahya
Yahya
13-5-1
Elo 1030
Wrestler
VS
Clopton
0-1
Elo 872

The Featherweight matchup features Rani Yahya (13-5-1) taking on Josh Clopton (0-1).

Yahya is rated at 1030 — 158 points above Clopton's 872. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Clopton throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Clopton is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Yahya has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rani Yahya over Josh Clopton. We're leaning Yahya here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

54%
Francimar Barroso
Barroso
4-3
Elo 961
Striker
VS
Oliveira
0-1
Elo 844

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Francimar Barroso (4-3) taking on Ednaldo Oliveira (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Barroso at 961 versus Oliveira at 844. That 117-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Oliveira throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Oliveira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Barroso has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Francimar Barroso over Ednaldo Oliveira. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Barroso at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
Viscardi Andrade
Andrade
2-1
Elo 1141
VS
Marunde
0-1
Elo 790

The Welterweight matchup features Viscardi Andrade (2-1) taking on Bristol Marunde (0-1).

Andrade is rated at 1141 — 352 points above Marunde's 790. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marunde throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Marunde is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Andrade has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Viscardi Andrade over Bristol Marunde. The model gives Andrade a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.