UFC 156: Aldo vs Edgar: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, February 2, 2013·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 156: Aldo vs Edgar lands on Saturday, February 2, 2013 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jose Aldo vs Frankie EdgarFeatherweightFrankie EdgarLean57%
Rogerio Nogueira vs Rashad EvansLight HeavyweightRashad EvansStrong83%
Antonio Silva vs Alistair OvereemHeavyweightAntonio SilvaLean58%
Demian Maia vs Jon FitchWelterweightJon FitchLean57%
Joseph Benavidez vs Ian McCallFlyweightJoseph BenavidezConfident70%
Evan Dunham vs Gleison TibauLightweightGleison TibauLean55%
Tyron Woodley vs Jay HieronWelterweightTyron WoodleyToss-up53%
King Green vs Jacob VolkmannLightweightJacob VolkmannLean58%
Isaac Vallie-Flagg vs Yves EdwardsLightweightYves EdwardsLean56%
Dustin Kimura vs Chico CamusBantamweightDustin KimuraToss-up52%
Francisco Rivera vs Edwin FigueroaBantamweightFrancisco RiveraToss-up55%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jose Aldo vs Frankie Edgar

FeatherweightTitle Fight
57%
Frankie Edgar
Aldo
14-9
CO-I1541
All-Rounder
VS
Edgar
18-11-1
CO-II1361
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 74%
Under 26%Over 74%

The Featherweight championship matchup features Jose Aldo (14-9) taking on Frankie Edgar (18-11-1).

Aldo is rated at 1541 — 180 points above Edgar's 1361. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edgar throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Edgar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Edgar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frankie Edgar over Jose Aldo. The model gives Edgar a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Rogerio Nogueira vs Rashad Evans

Light Heavyweight
83%
Rashad Evans
Nogueira
6-7
CO-III1280
All-Rounder
VS
Evans
14-8-1
CO-III1307
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Rogerio Nogueira (6-7) taking on Rashad Evans (14-8-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nogueira at 1280, Evans at 1307. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Nogueira is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Evans brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Nogueira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nogueira throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Evans is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Evans has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rashad Evans over Rogerio Nogueira. The model is firm on this one: Evans at 83%.

58%
Antonio Silva
Silva
3-7-1
RK-III1046
Striker
VS
Overeem
12-8
CO-I1572
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 63%
Under 63%Over 37%

The Heavyweight matchup features Antonio Silva (3-7-1) taking on Alistair Overeem (12-8).

Overeem is rated at 1572 — 526 points above Silva's 1046. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Overeem throws significantly more leather — a 5.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Overeem is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Overeem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Antonio Silva over Alistair Overeem. The model gives Silva a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Demian Maia vs Jon Fitch

Welterweight
57%
Jon Fitch
Maia
22-11
CO-I1506
Wrestler
VS
Fitch
14-3-1
CO-I1527
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Welterweight matchup features Demian Maia (22-11) taking on Jon Fitch (14-3-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Maia at 1506, Fitch at 1527. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fitch throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Fitch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Fitch has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jon Fitch over Demian Maia. The model gives Fitch a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

70%
Joseph Benavidez
Benavidez
15-6
CO-II1420
Wrestler
VS
McCall
2-3-1
RK-III1055
Striker
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Flyweight matchup features Joseph Benavidez (15-6) taking on Ian McCall (2-3-1).

Benavidez is rated at 1420 — 366 points above McCall's 1055. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Benavidez's wrestler game against McCall's striker approach. Benavidez looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while McCall brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. McCall throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. McCall is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Benavidez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joseph Benavidez over Ian McCall. We're leaning Benavidez here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

55%
Gleison Tibau
Dunham
11-9-1
RK-I1146
All-Rounder
VS
Tibau
16-12
RK-I1163
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Lightweight matchup features Evan Dunham (11-9-1) taking on Gleison Tibau (16-12).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Dunham at 1146, Tibau at 1163. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Dunham's knockout artist game against Tibau's wrestler approach. Dunham is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Tibau looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dunham throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Tibau is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Tibau has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gleison Tibau over Evan Dunham. The model gives Tibau a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Tyron Woodley vs Jay Hieron

Welterweight
53%
Tyron Woodley
Woodley
9-6-1
CH-III1642
All-Rounder
VS
Hieron
0-4
UC-II684
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Welterweight matchup features Tyron Woodley (9-6-1) taking on Jay Hieron (0-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Hieron.

Woodley is rated at 1642 — 959 points above Hieron's 684. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hieron throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Hieron is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.9 more per 15 minutes. Woodley has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tyron Woodley over Jay Hieron. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Woodley at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Jacob Volkmann
Green
15-12-1
CO-II1371
All-Rounder
VS
Volkmann
6-4
RK-II1069
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Lightweight matchup features King Green (15-12-1) taking on Jacob Volkmann (6-4).

Green is rated at 1371 — 303 points above Volkmann's 1069. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Green is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Volkmann looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Volkmann the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Volkmann throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Volkmann is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Green has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jacob Volkmann over King Green. The model gives Volkmann a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Yves Edwards
Vallie-Flagg
1-3
MC-III925
VS
Edwards
10-10
MC-III913
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Isaac Vallie-Flagg (1-3) taking on Yves Edwards (10-10). Edwards will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Vallie-Flagg at 925, Edwards at 913. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edwards throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Edwards is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Vallie-Flagg has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yves Edwards over Isaac Vallie-Flagg. The model gives Edwards a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Dustin Kimura vs Chico Camus

Bantamweight
52%
Dustin Kimura
Kimura
2-3
PR-I891
VS
Camus
3-4
MC-I977
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Bantamweight matchup features Dustin Kimura (2-3) taking on Chico Camus (3-4). Kimura will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Camus at 977 versus Kimura at 891. That 86-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Camus throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Camus is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Kimura has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dustin Kimura over Chico Camus. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Kimura at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

55%
Francisco Rivera
Rivera
4-6
RK-III1020
All-Rounder
VS
Figueroa
2-4
PR-III804
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Francisco Rivera (4-6) taking on Edwin Figueroa (2-4).

Rivera is rated at 1020 — 216 points above Figueroa's 804. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Rivera's all-rounder game against Figueroa's knockout artist approach. Rivera is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Figueroa is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rivera throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Figueroa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Rivera has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Francisco Rivera over Edwin Figueroa. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Rivera at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.