UFC 308: Topuria vs. Holloway: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 26, 2024·Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 308: Topuria vs. Holloway lands on Saturday, October 26, 2024 in Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Ilia Topuria vs Max HollowayFeatherweightMax HollowayToss-up52%
Khamzat Chimaev vs Robert WhittakerMiddleweightKhamzat ChimaevLean63%
Magomed Ankalaev vs Aleksandar RakicLight HeavyweightMagomed AnkalaevConfident68%
Lerone Murphy vs Dan IgeFeatherweightLerone MurphyConfident65%
Shara Magomedov vs Armen PetrosyanMiddleweightShara MagomedovLean60%
Ibo Aslan vs Rafael CerqueiraLight HeavyweightIbo AslanLean63%
Geoff Neal vs Rafael Dos AnjosWelterweightGeoff NealLean60%
Mateusz Rebecki vs Myktybek OrolbaiCatch WeightMyktybek OrolbaiLean63%
Abus Magomedov vs Brunno FerreiraMiddleweightAbus MagomedovLean61%
Kennedy Nzechukwu vs Chris BarnettHeavyweightKennedy NzechukwuStrong78%
Farid Basharat vs Victor HugoFeatherweightFarid BasharatLean61%
Ismail Naurdiev vs Bruno SilvaMiddleweightIsmail NaurdievLean56%
Rinat Fakhretdinov vs Carlos LealWelterweightRinat FakhretdinovConfident67%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Ilia Topuria vs Max Holloway

Featherweight
52%
Max Holloway
Topuria
8-0
Elo 2094
Knockout Artist
VS
Holloway
22-8
Elo 1897
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Ilia Topuria (8-0) taking on Max Holloway (22-8). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Holloway.

Topuria is rated at 2094 — 196 points above Holloway's 1897. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Topuria rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Holloway throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Topuria is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Topuria has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Max Holloway over Ilia Topuria. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Holloway at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

63%
Khamzat Chimaev
Chimaev
8-0
Elo 1987
Submission Artist
VS
Whittaker
17-6
Elo 1528
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Khamzat Chimaev (8-0) taking on Robert Whittaker (17-6). Chimaev is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Chimaev is rated at 1987 — 459 points above Whittaker's 1528. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Chimaev rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Chimaev's submission artist game against Whittaker's striker approach. Chimaev is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Whittaker brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Chimaev throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Chimaev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Whittaker has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Khamzat Chimaev over Robert Whittaker. The model gives Chimaev a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

68%
Magomed Ankalaev
Ankalaev
12-1-1
Elo 1772
Striker
VS
Rakic
6-4
Elo 1283
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Magomed Ankalaev (12-1-1) taking on Aleksandar Rakic (6-4). Rakic will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ankalaev is rated at 1772 — 489 points above Rakic's 1283. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ankalaev rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Ankalaev's striker game against Rakic's wrestler approach. Ankalaev brings a versatile approach, while Rakic looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rakic throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Ankalaev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Ankalaev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Magomed Ankalaev over Aleksandar Rakic. We're leaning Ankalaev here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Lerone Murphy vs Dan Ige

Featherweight
65%
Lerone Murphy
Murphy
8-0-1
Elo 1654
All-Rounder
VS
Ige
11-9
Elo 1235
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Lerone Murphy (8-0-1) taking on Dan Ige (11-9). Murphy is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Murphy is rated at 1654 — 419 points above Ige's 1235. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Murphy rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Murphy throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Murphy is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Murphy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Lerone Murphy over Dan Ige. We're leaning Murphy here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
Shara Magomedov
Magomedov
4-1
Elo 1254
Striker
VS
Petrosyan
3-3
Elo 910
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Shara Magomedov (4-1) taking on Armen Petrosyan (3-3).

Magomedov is rated at 1254 — 344 points above Petrosyan's 910. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Magomedov throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Petrosyan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Petrosyan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Shara Magomedov over Armen Petrosyan. The model gives Magomedov a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Ibo Aslan vs Rafael Cerqueira

Light Heavyweight
63%
Ibo Aslan
Aslan
2-2
Elo 828
VS
Cerqueira
0-3
Elo 727

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ibo Aslan (2-2) taking on Rafael Cerqueira (0-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Aslan at 828 versus Cerqueira at 727. That 101-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aslan throws significantly more leather — a 6.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Cerqueira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cerqueira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ibo Aslan over Rafael Cerqueira. The model gives Aslan a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

60%
Geoff Neal
Neal
8-5
Elo 1247
All-Rounder
VS
Anjos
21-14
Elo 1282
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features Geoff Neal (8-5) taking on Rafael Dos Anjos (21-14). Neal is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Anjos carries a modest Elo edge (1282 to 1247), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Neal is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Anjos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Anjos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Neal throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Anjos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Neal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Geoff Neal over Rafael Dos Anjos. The model gives Neal a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

63%
Myktybek Orolbai
Rebecki
4-2
Elo 1098
All-Rounder
VS
Orolbai
3-1
Elo 1374

The Catch Weight matchup features Mateusz Rebecki (4-2) taking on Myktybek Orolbai (3-1). Orolbai is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

Orolbai is rated at 1374 — 276 points above Rebecki's 1098. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rebecki throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Orolbai is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Rebecki has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Myktybek Orolbai over Mateusz Rebecki. The model gives Orolbai a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

61%
Abus Magomedov
Magomedov
4-2
Elo 1280
All-Rounder
VS
Ferreira
5-2
Elo 1344
Submission Artist

The Middleweight matchup features Abus Magomedov (4-2) taking on Brunno Ferreira (5-2). Magomedov is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Ferreira carries a modest Elo edge (1344 to 1280), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm. Magomedov rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Magomedov is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Ferreira is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Ferreira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferreira throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Magomedov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Magomedov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Abus Magomedov over Brunno Ferreira. The model gives Magomedov a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

78%
Kennedy Nzechukwu
Nzechukwu
8-6
Elo 1071
All-Rounder
VS
Barnett
2-3
Elo 861
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Kennedy Nzechukwu (8-6) taking on Chris Barnett (2-3). Nzechukwu is the bigger frame at 6'5" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

Nzechukwu is rated at 1071 — 211 points above Barnett's 861. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Nzechukwu's all-rounder game against Barnett's striker approach. Nzechukwu is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Barnett brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nzechukwu throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Nzechukwu is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Nzechukwu has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kennedy Nzechukwu over Chris Barnett. The model is firm on this one: Nzechukwu at 78%.

Farid Basharat vs Victor Hugo

Featherweight
61%
Farid Basharat
Basharat
5-0
Elo 1459
Wrestler
VS
Hugo
1-0
Elo 1043

The Featherweight matchup features Farid Basharat (5-0) taking on Victor Hugo (1-0).

Basharat is rated at 1459 — 416 points above Hugo's 1043. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Basharat rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hugo throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Basharat is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.4 more per 15 minutes. Hugo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Farid Basharat over Victor Hugo. The model gives Basharat a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Ismail Naurdiev
Naurdiev
3-3
Elo 1183
Striker
VS
Silva
4-6
Elo 798
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Ismail Naurdiev (3-3) taking on Bruno Silva (4-6).

Naurdiev is rated at 1183 — 385 points above Silva's 798. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Naurdiev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Naurdiev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ismail Naurdiev over Bruno Silva. The model gives Naurdiev a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

67%
Rinat Fakhretdinov
Fakhretdinov
5-0-1
Elo 1483
Wrestler
VS
Leal
1-2
Elo 1189

The Welterweight matchup features Rinat Fakhretdinov (5-0-1) taking on Carlos Leal (1-2).

Fakhretdinov is rated at 1483 — 294 points above Leal's 1189. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fakhretdinov throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Fakhretdinov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.4 more per 15 minutes. Leal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rinat Fakhretdinov over Carlos Leal. We're leaning Fakhretdinov here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.