UFC on FOX: Henderson vs Diaz: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, December 8, 2012·Seattle, Washington, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC on FOX: Henderson vs Diaz lands on Saturday, December 8, 2012 in Seattle, Washington, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Benson Henderson vs Nate DiazLightweightBenson HendersonConfident66%
Alexander Gustafsson vs Mauricio RuaLight HeavyweightAlexander GustafssonConfident66%
Rory MacDonald vs BJ PennWelterweightRory MacDonaldStrong80%
Matt Brown vs Mike SwickWelterweightMatt BrownLean65%
Yves Edwards vs Jeremy StephensLightweightJeremy StephensLean56%
Raphael Assuncao vs Mike EastonBantamweightRaphael AssuncaoToss-up50%
Ramsey Nijem vs Joe ProctorLightweightRamsey NijemConfident75%
Daron Cruickshank vs Henry MartinezLightweightDaron CruickshankConfident68%
Abel Trujillo vs Marcus LeVesseurLightweightMarcus LeVesseurToss-up51%
Dennis Siver vs Nam PhanFeatherweightDennis SiverConfident69%
Scott Jorgensen vs John AlbertBantamweightScott JorgensenLean64%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Benson Henderson vs Nate Diaz

LightweightTitle Fight
66%
Benson Henderson
Henderson
10-3
Elo 1507
All-Rounder
VS
Diaz
15-11
Elo 1557
All-Rounder

The Lightweight championship matchup features Benson Henderson (10-3) taking on Nate Diaz (15-11). Diaz is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Diaz carries a modest Elo edge (1557 to 1507), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Henderson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Diaz is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Diaz the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diaz throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Henderson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Henderson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Benson Henderson over Nate Diaz. We're leaning Henderson here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

66%
Alexander Gustafsson
Gustafsson
10-7
Elo 1169
All-Rounder
VS
Rua
11-11-1
Elo 876
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alexander Gustafsson (10-7) taking on Mauricio Rua (11-11-1). Gustafsson is the bigger frame at 6'5" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Gustafsson is rated at 1169 — 293 points above Rua's 876. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Gustafsson is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Rua is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Gustafsson the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gustafsson throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Rua is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Gustafsson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexander Gustafsson over Mauricio Rua. We're leaning Gustafsson here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Rory MacDonald vs BJ Penn

Welterweight
80%
Rory MacDonald
MacDonald
9-3
Elo 1465
All-Rounder
VS
Penn
12-12-2
Elo 938
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Rory MacDonald (9-3) taking on BJ Penn (12-12-2). MacDonald is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

MacDonald is rated at 1465 — 527 points above Penn's 938. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: MacDonald looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving MacDonald the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. MacDonald throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. MacDonald is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. MacDonald has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rory MacDonald over BJ Penn. The model is firm on this one: MacDonald at 80%.

Matt Brown vs Mike Swick

Welterweight
65%
Matt Brown
Brown
16-13
Elo 1201
All-Rounder
VS
Swick
10-4
Elo 1045
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Matt Brown (16-13) taking on Mike Swick (10-4).

Brown is rated at 1201 — 156 points above Swick's 1045. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Brown looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Swick is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Brown the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brown throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Brown is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Brown has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Brown over Mike Swick. The model gives Brown a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Jeremy Stephens
Edwards
10-9
Elo 818
All-Rounder
VS
Stephens
15-18
Elo 941
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Yves Edwards (10-9) taking on Jeremy Stephens (15-18).

There's a real Elo separation here: Stephens at 941 versus Edwards at 818. That 123-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Edwards looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Stephens is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Edwards the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edwards throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Stephens is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Edwards has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jeremy Stephens over Yves Edwards. The model gives Stephens a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

50%
Raphael Assuncao
Assuncao
12-6
Elo 1099
All-Rounder
VS
Easton
3-3
Elo 934
Striker

The Bantamweight matchup features Raphael Assuncao (12-6) taking on Mike Easton (3-3). Easton will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Assuncao is rated at 1099 — 165 points above Easton's 934. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Assuncao's all-rounder game against Easton's striker approach. Assuncao is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Easton brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Assuncao throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Assuncao is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Assuncao has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Raphael Assuncao over Mike Easton. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Assuncao at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

75%
Ramsey Nijem
Nijem
5-4
Elo 944
Wrestler
VS
Proctor
4-3
Elo 947
Knockout Artist

The Lightweight matchup features Ramsey Nijem (5-4) taking on Joe Proctor (4-3). Nijem will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nijem at 944, Proctor at 947. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Nijem's wrestler game against Proctor's knockout artist approach. Nijem looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Proctor is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Proctor throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Nijem is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.3 more per 15 minutes. Nijem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ramsey Nijem over Joe Proctor. We're leaning Nijem here at 75%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

68%
Daron Cruickshank
Cruickshank
6-5
Elo 879
Wrestler
VS
Martinez
1-1
Elo 899

The Lightweight matchup features Daron Cruickshank (6-5) taking on Henry Martinez (1-1). Cruickshank will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Cruickshank at 879, Martinez at 899. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Martinez throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Cruickshank is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.0 more per 15 minutes. Martinez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daron Cruickshank over Henry Martinez. We're leaning Cruickshank here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

51%
Marcus LeVesseur
Trujillo
6-3
Elo 1031
All-Rounder
VS
LeVesseur
1-1
Elo 833

The Lightweight matchup features Abel Trujillo (6-3) taking on Marcus LeVesseur (1-1).

Trujillo is rated at 1031 — 197 points above LeVesseur's 833. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. LeVesseur throws significantly more leather — a 3.3 sig. strike per minute gap. LeVesseur is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.2 more per 15 minutes. Trujillo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marcus LeVesseur over Abel Trujillo. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward LeVesseur at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Dennis Siver vs Nam Phan

Featherweight
69%
Dennis Siver
Siver
11-8
Elo 1214
All-Rounder
VS
Phan
2-5
Elo 859
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Dennis Siver (11-8) taking on Nam Phan (2-5).

Siver is rated at 1214 — 355 points above Phan's 859. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Siver's all-rounder game against Phan's knockout artist approach. Siver is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Phan is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Phan throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Siver is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Siver has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dennis Siver over Nam Phan. We're leaning Siver here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

64%
Scott Jorgensen
Jorgensen
4-7
Elo 735
Wrestler
VS
Albert
1-3
Elo 724

The Bantamweight matchup features Scott Jorgensen (4-7) taking on John Albert (1-3). Albert is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Jorgensen at 735, Albert at 724. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Albert throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Jorgensen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Jorgensen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Scott Jorgensen over John Albert. The model gives Jorgensen a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.