UFC 137: Penn vs Diaz: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 29, 2011·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 137: Penn vs Diaz lands on Saturday, October 29, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Nick Diaz vs BJ PennWelterweightBJ PennToss-up52%
Cheick Kongo vs Matt MitrioneHeavyweightCheick KongoLean61%
Roy Nelson vs Mirko FilipovicHeavyweightMirko FilipovicToss-up51%
Scott Jorgensen vs Jeff CurranBantamweightScott JorgensenToss-up54%
Hatsu Hioki vs George RoopFeatherweightGeorge RoopLean56%
Donald Cerrone vs Dennis SiverLightweightDonald CerroneConfident67%
Bart Palaszewski vs Tyson GriffinFeatherweightTyson GriffinLean56%
Brandon Vera vs Eliot MarshallLight HeavyweightBrandon VeraToss-up55%
Ramsey Nijem vs Danny DownesLightweightRamsey NijemLean64%
Francis Carmont vs Chris CamozziMiddleweightChris CamozziLean58%
Clifford Starks vs Dustin JacobyMiddleweightDustin JacobyLean57%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Nick Diaz vs BJ Penn

Welterweight
52%
BJ Penn
Diaz
7-7
CO-III1304
All-Rounder
VS
Penn
12-13-2
RK-I1142
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Welterweight matchup features Nick Diaz (7-7) taking on BJ Penn (12-13-2). Diaz is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Diaz is rated at 1304 — 162 points above Penn's 1142. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Diaz looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Diaz the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diaz throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Diaz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Penn has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: BJ Penn over Nick Diaz. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Penn at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

61%
Cheick Kongo
Kongo
11-6-1
CO-III1267
Striker
VS
Mitrione
9-5
CO-III1333
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Heavyweight matchup features Cheick Kongo (11-6-1) taking on Matt Mitrione (9-5).

Mitrione carries a modest Elo edge (1333 to 1267), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Kongo brings a versatile approach, while Mitrione is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Mitrione the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mitrione throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Kongo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cheick Kongo over Matt Mitrione. The model gives Kongo a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Mirko Filipovic
Nelson
9-10
CO-III1242
Striker
VS
Filipovic
5-6
CO-III1235
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Heavyweight matchup features Roy Nelson (9-10) taking on Mirko Filipovic (5-6).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nelson at 1242, Filipovic at 1235. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Nelson's striker game against Filipovic's all-rounder approach. Nelson brings a versatile approach, while Filipovic is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nelson throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Filipovic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mirko Filipovic over Roy Nelson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Filipovic at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

54%
Scott Jorgensen
Jorgensen
4-8
UC-I744
Wrestler
VS
Curran
0-3
UC-II707
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Bantamweight matchup features Scott Jorgensen (4-8) taking on Jeff Curran (0-3). Curran will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jorgensen carries a modest Elo edge (744 to 707), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jorgensen throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Jorgensen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Jorgensen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Scott Jorgensen over Jeff Curran. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jorgensen at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Hatsu Hioki vs George Roop

Featherweight
56%
George Roop
Hioki
3-5
MC-III907
All-Rounder
VS
Roop
5-8
MC-II961
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Featherweight matchup features Hatsu Hioki (3-5) taking on George Roop (5-8).

Roop carries a modest Elo edge (961 to 907), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Hioki's all-rounder game against Roop's striker approach. Hioki is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Roop brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roop throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Roop is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Hioki has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: George Roop over Hatsu Hioki. The model gives Roop a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

67%
Donald Cerrone
Cerrone
23-14
CO-III1238
All-Rounder
VS
Siver
12-8
CO-II1351
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Donald Cerrone (23-14) taking on Dennis Siver (12-8). Cerrone is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Siver at 1351 versus Cerrone at 1238. That 114-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cerrone throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Cerrone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Siver has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Donald Cerrone over Dennis Siver. We're leaning Cerrone here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

56%
Tyson Griffin
Palaszewski
1-3
PR-III829
VS
Griffin
8-6
RK-III1016
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Featherweight matchup features Bart Palaszewski (1-3) taking on Tyson Griffin (8-6). Palaszewski is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Griffin is rated at 1016 — 186 points above Palaszewski's 829. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Palaszewski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tyson Griffin over Bart Palaszewski. The model gives Griffin a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Brandon Vera vs Eliot Marshall

Light Heavyweight
55%
Brandon Vera
Vera
8-7
RK-II1098
All-Rounder
VS
Marshall
3-3
MC-II947
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brandon Vera (8-7) taking on Eliot Marshall (3-3).

Vera is rated at 1098 — 151 points above Marshall's 947. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Vera's knockout artist game against Marshall's all-rounder approach. Vera is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Marshall is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Vera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Marshall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brandon Vera over Eliot Marshall. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Vera at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

64%
Ramsey Nijem
Nijem
5-5
MC-I990
Wrestler
VS
Downes
0-2
UC-I786
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Lightweight matchup features Ramsey Nijem (5-5) taking on Danny Downes (0-2). Nijem will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Nijem is rated at 990 — 204 points above Downes's 786. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nijem throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Downes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nijem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ramsey Nijem over Danny Downes. The model gives Nijem a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

58%
Chris Camozzi
Carmont
6-3
CO-III1249
All-Rounder
VS
Camozzi
9-10
RK-III1038
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Middleweight matchup features Francis Carmont (6-3) taking on Chris Camozzi (9-10). Carmont will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Carmont is rated at 1249 — 211 points above Camozzi's 1038. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Camozzi throws significantly more leather — a 4.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Camozzi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Carmont has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Camozzi over Francis Carmont. The model gives Camozzi a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

57%
Dustin Jacoby
Starks
1-2
PR-II840
VS
Jacoby
10-6-1
CO-II1411
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Middleweight matchup features Clifford Starks (1-2) taking on Dustin Jacoby (10-6-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Jacoby.

Jacoby is rated at 1411 — 570 points above Starks's 840. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jacoby throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Jacoby is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jacoby has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dustin Jacoby over Clifford Starks. The model gives Jacoby a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.