UFC 137: Penn vs Diaz: Predictions & Analysis
UFC 137: Penn vs Diaz lands on Saturday, October 29, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Diaz vs BJ PennWelterweight | BJ Penn | Toss-up | 52% |
| Cheick Kongo vs Matt MitrioneHeavyweight | Cheick Kongo | Lean | 61% |
| Roy Nelson vs Mirko FilipovicHeavyweight | Mirko Filipovic | Toss-up | 51% |
| Scott Jorgensen vs Jeff CurranBantamweight | Scott Jorgensen | Toss-up | 54% |
| Hatsu Hioki vs George RoopFeatherweight | George Roop | Lean | 56% |
| Donald Cerrone vs Dennis SiverLightweight | Donald Cerrone | Confident | 67% |
| Bart Palaszewski vs Tyson GriffinFeatherweight | Tyson Griffin | Lean | 56% |
| Brandon Vera vs Eliot MarshallLight Heavyweight | Brandon Vera | Toss-up | 55% |
| Ramsey Nijem vs Danny DownesLightweight | Ramsey Nijem | Lean | 64% |
| Francis Carmont vs Chris CamozziMiddleweight | Chris Camozzi | Lean | 58% |
| Clifford Starks vs Dustin JacobyMiddleweight | Dustin Jacoby | Lean | 57% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
The Welterweight matchup features Nick Diaz (7-7) taking on BJ Penn (12-13-2). Diaz is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 6-inch reach advantage.
Diaz is rated at 1304 — 162 points above Penn's 1142. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
The style clash matters here: Diaz looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Diaz the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Diaz throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Diaz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Penn has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: BJ Penn over Nick Diaz. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Penn at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Cheick Kongo vs Matt Mitrione
The Heavyweight matchup features Cheick Kongo (11-6-1) taking on Matt Mitrione (9-5).
Mitrione carries a modest Elo edge (1333 to 1267), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
The style clash matters here: Kongo brings a versatile approach, while Mitrione is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Mitrione the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Mitrione throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Kongo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Cheick Kongo over Matt Mitrione. The model gives Kongo a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.
Roy Nelson vs Mirko Filipovic
The Heavyweight matchup features Roy Nelson (9-10) taking on Mirko Filipovic (5-6).
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nelson at 1242, Filipovic at 1235. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.
Stylistically this is Nelson's striker game against Filipovic's all-rounder approach. Nelson brings a versatile approach, while Filipovic is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Nelson throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Filipovic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Mirko Filipovic over Roy Nelson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Filipovic at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Scott Jorgensen vs Jeff Curran
The Bantamweight matchup features Scott Jorgensen (4-8) taking on Jeff Curran (0-3). Curran will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.
Jorgensen carries a modest Elo edge (744 to 707), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
A few statistical edges stand out. Jorgensen throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Jorgensen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Jorgensen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Scott Jorgensen over Jeff Curran. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jorgensen at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Hatsu Hioki vs George Roop
The Featherweight matchup features Hatsu Hioki (3-5) taking on George Roop (5-8).
Roop carries a modest Elo edge (961 to 907), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
Stylistically this is Hioki's all-rounder game against Roop's striker approach. Hioki is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Roop brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Roop throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Roop is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Hioki has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: George Roop over Hatsu Hioki. The model gives Roop a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.
Donald Cerrone vs Dennis Siver
The Lightweight matchup features Donald Cerrone (23-14) taking on Dennis Siver (12-8). Cerrone is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
There's a real Elo separation here: Siver at 1351 versus Cerrone at 1238. That 114-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Cerrone throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Cerrone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Siver has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Donald Cerrone over Dennis Siver. We're leaning Cerrone here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Bart Palaszewski vs Tyson Griffin
The Featherweight matchup features Bart Palaszewski (1-3) taking on Tyson Griffin (8-6). Palaszewski is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.
Griffin is rated at 1016 — 186 points above Palaszewski's 829. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Palaszewski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Tyson Griffin over Bart Palaszewski. The model gives Griffin a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.
Brandon Vera vs Eliot Marshall
The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brandon Vera (8-7) taking on Eliot Marshall (3-3).
Vera is rated at 1098 — 151 points above Marshall's 947. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Stylistically this is Vera's knockout artist game against Marshall's all-rounder approach. Vera is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Marshall is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Vera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Marshall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Brandon Vera over Eliot Marshall. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Vera at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Ramsey Nijem vs Danny Downes
The Lightweight matchup features Ramsey Nijem (5-5) taking on Danny Downes (0-2). Nijem will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.
Nijem is rated at 990 — 204 points above Downes's 786. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Nijem throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Downes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nijem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Ramsey Nijem over Danny Downes. The model gives Nijem a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.
Francis Carmont vs Chris Camozzi
The Middleweight matchup features Francis Carmont (6-3) taking on Chris Camozzi (9-10). Carmont will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.
Carmont is rated at 1249 — 211 points above Camozzi's 1038. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Camozzi throws significantly more leather — a 4.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Camozzi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Carmont has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Chris Camozzi over Francis Carmont. The model gives Camozzi a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.
Clifford Starks vs Dustin Jacoby
The Middleweight matchup features Clifford Starks (1-2) taking on Dustin Jacoby (10-6-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Jacoby.
Jacoby is rated at 1411 — 570 points above Starks's 840. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Jacoby throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Jacoby is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jacoby has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Dustin Jacoby over Clifford Starks. The model gives Jacoby a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.