UFC 127: Penn vs Fitch: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, February 26, 2011·Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 127: Penn vs Fitch lands on Saturday, February 26, 2011 in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia with 12 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
BJ Penn vs Jon FitchWelterweightJon FitchLean57%
Michael Bisping vs Jorge RiveraMiddleweightMichael BispingStrong76%
Dennis Siver vs George SotiropoulosLightweightGeorge SotiropoulosConfident65%
Brian Ebersole vs Chris LytleWelterweightChris LytleLean55%
Kyle Noke vs Chris CamozziMiddleweightKyle NokeToss-up54%
Ross Pearson vs Spencer FisherLightweightRoss PearsonConfident72%
Alexander Gustafsson vs James Te HunaLight HeavyweightAlexander GustafssonLean60%
Nick Ring vs Riki FukudaMiddleweightRiki FukudaToss-up53%
Anthony Perosh vs Tom BlackledgeLight HeavyweightAnthony PeroshLean64%
Zhang Tiequan vs Jason ReinhardtFeatherweightZhang TiequanLean62%
Mark Hunt vs Chris TuchschererHeavyweightMark HuntConfident66%
Curt Warburton vs Maciej JewtuszkoLightweightCurt WarburtonConfident73%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

BJ Penn vs Jon Fitch

Welterweight
57%
Jon Fitch
Penn
12-12-2
Elo 938
All-Rounder
VS
Fitch
14-2-1
Elo 1398
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features BJ Penn (12-12-2) taking on Jon Fitch (14-2-1). Fitch is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Fitch is rated at 1398 — 460 points above Penn's 938. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Fitch looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Fitch the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fitch throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Fitch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.1 more per 15 minutes. Penn has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jon Fitch over BJ Penn. The model gives Fitch a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

76%
Michael Bisping
Bisping
20-8
Elo 1522
Striker
VS
Rivera
7-7
Elo 1174
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Michael Bisping (20-8) taking on Jorge Rivera (7-7).

Bisping is rated at 1522 — 348 points above Rivera's 1174. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Bisping looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Rivera is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Bisping the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bisping throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Rivera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Bisping has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Bisping over Jorge Rivera. The model is firm on this one: Bisping at 76%.

65%
George Sotiropoulos
Siver
11-8
Elo 1214
All-Rounder
VS
Sotiropoulos
7-3
Elo 918
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Dennis Siver (11-8) taking on George Sotiropoulos (7-3). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Sotiropoulos.

Siver is rated at 1214 — 296 points above Sotiropoulos's 918. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Siver's knockout artist game against Sotiropoulos's wrestler approach. Siver is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Sotiropoulos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Siver throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Sotiropoulos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Sotiropoulos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: George Sotiropoulos over Dennis Siver. We're leaning Sotiropoulos here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

55%
Chris Lytle
Ebersole
5-2
Elo 1065
Striker
VS
Lytle
9-10
Elo 1330
Submission Artist

The Welterweight matchup features Brian Ebersole (5-2) taking on Chris Lytle (9-10). Ebersole will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Lytle is rated at 1330 — 265 points above Ebersole's 1065. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Ebersole brings a versatile approach, while Lytle is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Lytle the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lytle throws significantly more leather — a 6.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Lytle is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ebersole has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Lytle over Brian Ebersole. The model gives Lytle a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Kyle Noke vs Chris Camozzi

Middleweight
54%
Kyle Noke
Noke
6-5
Elo 869
All-Rounder
VS
Camozzi
9-9
Elo 986
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Kyle Noke (6-5) taking on Chris Camozzi (9-9).

There's a real Elo separation here: Camozzi at 986 versus Noke at 869. That 117-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Noke throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Noke is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Noke has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kyle Noke over Chris Camozzi. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Noke at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

72%
Ross Pearson
Pearson
12-12
Elo 849
Striker
VS
Fisher
9-7
Elo 876
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Ross Pearson (12-12) taking on Spencer Fisher (9-7).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Pearson at 849, Fisher at 876. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Pearson's striker game against Fisher's all-rounder approach. Pearson brings a versatile approach, while Fisher is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pearson throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Fisher is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Pearson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ross Pearson over Spencer Fisher. We're leaning Pearson here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
Alexander Gustafsson
Gustafsson
10-7
Elo 1169
All-Rounder
VS
Huna
5-4
Elo 843
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alexander Gustafsson (10-7) taking on James Te Huna (5-4). Gustafsson is the bigger frame at 6'5" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Gustafsson is rated at 1169 — 327 points above Huna's 843. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Gustafsson's all-rounder game against Huna's striker approach. Gustafsson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Huna brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gustafsson throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Huna is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Huna has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexander Gustafsson over James Te Huna. The model gives Gustafsson a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Nick Ring vs Riki Fukuda

Middleweight
53%
Riki Fukuda
Ring
3-2
Elo 1015
All-Rounder
VS
Fukuda
2-2
Elo 967

The Middleweight matchup features Nick Ring (3-2) taking on Riki Fukuda (2-2).

Ring carries a modest Elo edge (1015 to 967), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fukuda throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Fukuda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Fukuda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Riki Fukuda over Nick Ring. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Fukuda at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Anthony Perosh vs Tom Blackledge

Light Heavyweight
64%
Anthony Perosh
Perosh
5-6
Elo 872
Submission Artist
VS
Blackledge
0-0
Elo 829

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Anthony Perosh (5-6) taking on Tom Blackledge (0-0).

Perosh carries a modest Elo edge (872 to 829), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perosh throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Perosh is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Blackledge has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Perosh over Tom Blackledge. The model gives Perosh a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Zhang Tiequan
Tiequan
1-2
Elo 819
VS
Reinhardt
0-2
Elo 755

The Featherweight matchup features Zhang Tiequan (1-2) taking on Jason Reinhardt (0-2).

Tiequan carries a modest Elo edge (819 to 755), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Reinhardt throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Reinhardt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Tiequan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Zhang Tiequan over Jason Reinhardt. The model gives Tiequan a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

66%
Mark Hunt
Hunt
8-7-1
Elo 1169
Striker
VS
Tuchscherer
1-2
Elo 759

The Heavyweight matchup features Mark Hunt (8-7-1) taking on Chris Tuchscherer (1-2). Tuchscherer is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Hunt is rated at 1169 — 410 points above Tuchscherer's 759. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hunt throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Hunt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 13.5 more per 15 minutes. Hunt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Hunt over Chris Tuchscherer. We're leaning Hunt here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

73%
Curt Warburton
Warburton
1-1
Elo 973
VS
Jewtuszko
0-0
Elo 900

The Lightweight matchup features Curt Warburton (1-1) taking on Maciej Jewtuszko (0-0).

Warburton carries a modest Elo edge (973 to 900), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Warburton throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Warburton is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Jewtuszko has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Curt Warburton over Maciej Jewtuszko. We're leaning Warburton here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.