UFC 119: Mir vs Cro Cop: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, September 25, 2010·Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 119: Mir vs Cro Cop lands on Saturday, September 25, 2010 in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Frank Mir vs Mirko FilipovicHeavyweightMirko FilipovicLean55%
Ryan Bader vs Rogerio NogueiraLight HeavyweightRyan BaderConfident66%
Chris Lytle vs Matt SerraWelterweightChris LytleConfident66%
Sean Sherk vs Evan DunhamLightweightEvan DunhamConfident69%
Melvin Guillard vs Jeremy StephensLightweightJeremy StephensToss-up53%
CB Dollaway vs Joe DoerksenMiddleweightCB DollawayConfident73%
Matt Mitrione vs Joey BeltranHeavyweightMatt MitrioneLean61%
Thiago Tavares vs Pat AudinwoodLightweightThiago TavaresLean64%
Waylon Lowe vs Steve LopezLightweightWaylon LoweLean61%
TJ Grant vs Julio PaulinoWelterweightTJ GrantStrong80%
Sean McCorkle vs Mark HuntHeavyweightSean McCorkleLean63%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

55%
Mirko Filipovic
Mir
16-11
CO-II1367
Submission Artist
VS
Filipovic
5-6
CO-III1235
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Heavyweight matchup features Frank Mir (16-11) taking on Mirko Filipovic (5-6). Mir will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Mir at 1367 versus Filipovic at 1235. That 132-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Mir is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Filipovic is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, submission artists own a 55% win rate against all-rounders, giving Mir the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mir throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Mir is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Filipovic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mirko Filipovic over Frank Mir. The model gives Filipovic a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Ryan Bader vs Rogerio Nogueira

Light Heavyweight
66%
Ryan Bader
Bader
15-5
CH-III1658
Wrestler
VS
Nogueira
6-7
CO-III1280
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ryan Bader (15-5) taking on Rogerio Nogueira (6-7).

Bader is rated at 1658 — 378 points above Nogueira's 1280. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Bader looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Nogueira is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Bader the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bader throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Bader is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Bader has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ryan Bader over Rogerio Nogueira. We're leaning Bader here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Chris Lytle vs Matt Serra

Welterweight
66%
Chris Lytle
Lytle
10-10
CO-II1349
Submission Artist
VS
Serra
7-7
CO-III1275
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Welterweight matchup features Chris Lytle (10-10) taking on Matt Serra (7-7). There's a 5-inch height gap favoring Lytle.

Lytle carries a modest Elo edge (1349 to 1275), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Lytle's wrestler game against Serra's knockout artist approach. Lytle looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Serra is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lytle throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Serra is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Lytle has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Lytle over Matt Serra. We're leaning Lytle here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Sean Sherk vs Evan Dunham

Lightweight
69%
Evan Dunham
Sherk
8-4
CO-II1417
Wrestler
VS
Dunham
11-9-1
RK-I1146
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Lightweight matchup features Sean Sherk (8-4) taking on Evan Dunham (11-9-1). Dunham is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Sherk is rated at 1417 — 271 points above Dunham's 1146. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Sherk looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Dunham is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Sherk the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dunham throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Sherk is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Dunham has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Evan Dunham over Sean Sherk. We're leaning Dunham here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

53%
Jeremy Stephens
Guillard
12-9
CO-III1260
All-Rounder
VS
Stephens
15-19
RK-II1112
Striker
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Lightweight matchup features Melvin Guillard (12-9) taking on Jeremy Stephens (15-19).

There's a real Elo separation here: Guillard at 1260 versus Stephens at 1112. That 148-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stephens throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Guillard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Guillard has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jeremy Stephens over Melvin Guillard. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Stephens at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

CB Dollaway vs Joe Doerksen

Middleweight
73%
CB Dollaway
Dollaway
11-9
RK-II1099
Wrestler
VS
Doerksen
2-7
MC-I971
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Middleweight matchup features CB Dollaway (11-9) taking on Joe Doerksen (2-7).

There's a real Elo separation here: Dollaway at 1099 versus Doerksen at 971. That 128-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dollaway throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollaway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Dollaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: CB Dollaway over Joe Doerksen. We're leaning Dollaway here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

61%
Matt Mitrione
Mitrione
9-5
CO-III1333
Striker
VS
Beltran
3-6
PR-III813
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Heavyweight matchup features Matt Mitrione (9-5) taking on Joey Beltran (3-6). Mitrione is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Mitrione is rated at 1333 — 520 points above Beltran's 813. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Beltran throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Beltran is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Mitrione over Joey Beltran. The model gives Mitrione a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

64%
Thiago Tavares
Tavares
10-7-1
CO-III1202
Wrestler
VS
Audinwood
0-2
UC-I786
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Lightweight matchup features Thiago Tavares (10-7-1) taking on Pat Audinwood (0-2).

Tavares is rated at 1202 — 416 points above Audinwood's 786. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Tavares throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Tavares is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Audinwood has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thiago Tavares over Pat Audinwood. The model gives Tavares a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Waylon Lowe vs Steve Lopez

Lightweight
61%
Waylon Lowe
Lowe
2-2
RK-II1068
VS
Lopez
0-2
PR-III831
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Lightweight matchup features Waylon Lowe (2-2) taking on Steve Lopez (0-2).

Lowe is rated at 1068 — 237 points above Lopez's 831. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lopez throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Lowe is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Lopez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Waylon Lowe over Steve Lopez. The model gives Lowe a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

TJ Grant vs Julio Paulino

Welterweight
80%
TJ Grant
Grant
8-3
CH-III1685
All-Rounder
VS
Paulino
0-2
PR-II862
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features TJ Grant (8-3) taking on Julio Paulino (0-2).

Grant is rated at 1685 — 823 points above Paulino's 862. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Grant rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Grant throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Grant is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Grant has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: TJ Grant over Julio Paulino. The model is firm on this one: Grant at 80%.

Sean McCorkle vs Mark Hunt

Heavyweight
63%
Sean McCorkle
McCorkle
1-2
PR-III807
VS
Hunt
8-8-1
CO-II1336
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Heavyweight matchup features Sean McCorkle (1-2) taking on Mark Hunt (8-8-1). McCorkle is the bigger frame at 6'7" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

Hunt is rated at 1336 — 529 points above McCorkle's 807. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hunt throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Hunt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Hunt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sean McCorkle over Mark Hunt. The model gives McCorkle a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.