UFC 117: Silva vs Sonnen: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 7, 2010·Oakland, California, USA
Published April 19, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 117: Silva vs Sonnen lands on Saturday, August 7, 2010 in Oakland, California, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Anderson Silva vs Chael SonnenMiddleweightAnderson SilvaStrong78%
Jon Fitch vs Thiago AlvesWelterweightJon FitchLean61%
Clay Guida vs Rafael Dos AnjosLightweightRafael Dos AnjosLean55%
Matt Hughes vs Ricardo AlmeidaWelterweightRicardo AlmeidaLean55%
Junior Dos Santos vs Roy NelsonHeavyweightJunior Dos SantosStrong77%
Rick Story vs Dustin HazelettWelterweightRick StoryLean57%
Phil Davis vs Rodney WallaceLight HeavyweightPhil DavisStrong87%
Johny Hendricks vs Charlie BrennemanWelterweightJohny HendricksConfident66%
Tim Boetsch vs Todd BrownLight HeavyweightTim BoetschLean61%
Stefan Struve vs Christian MorecraftHeavyweightStefan StruveLean58%
Dennis Hallman vs Ben SaundersWelterweightBen SaundersToss-up53%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Anderson Silva vs Chael Sonnen

MiddleweightTitle Fight
78%
Anderson Silva
Silva
17-7
CO-II1361
All-Rounder
VS
Sonnen
7-7
CO-I1528
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Middleweight championship matchup features Anderson Silva (17-7) taking on Chael Sonnen (7-7). Silva will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Sonnen is rated at 1528 — 166 points above Silva's 1361. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Silva is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Sonnen brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Silva the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sonnen throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Sonnen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.2 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anderson Silva over Chael Sonnen. The model is firm on this one: Silva at 78%.

Jon Fitch vs Thiago Alves

Welterweight
61%
Jon Fitch
Fitch
14-3-1
CO-I1527
Wrestler
VS
Alves
15-12
RK-III1061
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features Jon Fitch (14-3-1) taking on Thiago Alves (15-12). Fitch is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Fitch is rated at 1527 — 466 points above Alves's 1061. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Fitch's wrestler game against Alves's striker approach. Fitch looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Alves brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Alves throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Fitch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Alves has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jon Fitch over Thiago Alves. The model gives Fitch a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

55%
Rafael Dos Anjos
Guida
18-19
RK-III1054
All-Rounder
VS
Anjos
21-15
CO-II1443
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Lightweight matchup features Clay Guida (18-19) taking on Rafael Dos Anjos (21-15).

Anjos is rated at 1443 — 389 points above Guida's 1054. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guida throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Guida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Anjos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafael Dos Anjos over Clay Guida. The model gives Anjos a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

55%
Ricardo Almeida
Hughes
18-7
CO-II1368
Submission Artist
VS
Almeida
6-5
CO-III1222
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Welterweight matchup features Matt Hughes (18-7) taking on Ricardo Almeida (6-5). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Almeida.

There's a real Elo separation here: Hughes at 1368 versus Almeida at 1222. That 146-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Almeida throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Almeida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.8 more per 15 minutes. Hughes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricardo Almeida over Matt Hughes. The model gives Almeida a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

77%
Junior Dos Santos
Santos
15-8
CO-II1427
Striker
VS
Nelson
9-10
CO-III1242
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Junior Dos Santos (15-8) taking on Roy Nelson (9-10). Santos is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Santos is rated at 1427 — 185 points above Nelson's 1242. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.4 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Junior Dos Santos over Roy Nelson. The model is firm on this one: Santos at 77%.

57%
Rick Story
Story
12-7
CO-II1428
All-Rounder
VS
Hazelett
5-5
RK-III1064
Submission Artist
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Welterweight matchup features Rick Story (12-7) taking on Dustin Hazelett (5-5). Hazelett is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Story is rated at 1428 — 365 points above Hazelett's 1064. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Story rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Story is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Hazelett is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 55% win rate against all-rounders, giving Hazelett the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Story throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Story is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Story has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rick Story over Dustin Hazelett. The model gives Story a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Phil Davis vs Rodney Wallace

Light Heavyweight
87%
Phil Davis
Davis
9-3
CO-I1549
Wrestler
VS
Wallace
0-3
UC-I739
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Phil Davis (9-3) taking on Rodney Wallace (0-3). Davis is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Davis is rated at 1549 — 810 points above Wallace's 739. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Davis throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Wallace is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.0 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Phil Davis over Rodney Wallace. The model is firm on this one: Davis at 87%.

66%
Johny Hendricks
Hendricks
13-8
CO-III1254
Striker
VS
Brenneman
4-7
UC-I742
Striker
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features Johny Hendricks (13-8) taking on Charlie Brenneman (4-7).

Hendricks is rated at 1254 — 512 points above Brenneman's 742. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hendricks throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Hendricks is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Brenneman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Johny Hendricks over Charlie Brenneman. We're leaning Hendricks here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Tim Boetsch vs Todd Brown

Light Heavyweight
61%
Tim Boetsch
Boetsch
12-12
CO-III1280
Striker
VS
Brown
0-2
UC-II729
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Tim Boetsch (12-12) taking on Todd Brown (0-2).

Boetsch is rated at 1280 — 551 points above Brown's 729. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Boetsch throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Boetsch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Brown has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tim Boetsch over Todd Brown. The model gives Boetsch a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

58%
Stefan Struve
Struve
13-11
RK-II1071
All-Rounder
VS
Morecraft
1-3
PR-II834
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Stefan Struve (13-11) taking on Christian Morecraft (1-3). Struve is the bigger frame at 6'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Struve is rated at 1071 — 236 points above Morecraft's 834. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Struve throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Struve is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Morecraft has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Stefan Struve over Christian Morecraft. The model gives Struve a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

53%
Ben Saunders
Hallman
4-5
CO-III1231
Wrestler
VS
Saunders
9-10
MC-II937
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Welterweight matchup features Dennis Hallman (4-5) taking on Ben Saunders (9-10). Saunders is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Hallman is rated at 1231 — 295 points above Saunders's 937. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Hallman's wrestler game against Saunders's knockout artist approach. Hallman looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Saunders is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Saunders throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Hallman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Saunders has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ben Saunders over Dennis Hallman. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Saunders at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.