UFC Live: Vera vs Jones: Predictions & Analysis

Sunday, March 21, 2010·Broomfield, Colorado, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Live: Vera vs Jones lands on Sunday, March 21, 2010 in Broomfield, Colorado, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jon Jones vs Brandon VeraLight HeavyweightJon JonesStrong79%
Junior Dos Santos vs Gabriel GonzagaHeavyweightJunior Dos SantosConfident73%
Cheick Kongo vs Paul BuentelloHeavyweightCheick KongoConfident71%
Alessio Sakara vs James IrvinMiddleweightAlessio SakaraConfident74%
Clay Guida vs Shannon GugertyLightweightClay GuidaConfident70%
Vladimir Matyushenko vs Eliot MarshallLight HeavyweightEliot MarshallToss-up52%
Darren Elkins vs Duane LudwigLightweightDuane LudwigToss-up51%
John Howard vs Daniel RobertsWelterweightJohn HowardConfident67%
Brendan Schaub vs Chase GormleyHeavyweightBrendan SchaubLean58%
Mike Pierce vs Julio PaulinoWelterweightMike PierceStrong81%
Jason Brilz vs Eric SchaferLight HeavyweightJason BrilzLean57%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jon Jones vs Brandon Vera

Light Heavyweight
79%
Jon Jones
Jones
21-1
Elo 2161
All-Rounder
VS
Vera
8-6
Elo 945
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jon Jones (21-1) taking on Brandon Vera (8-6). Jones will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jones is rated at 2161 — 1216 points above Vera's 945. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Jones rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jones throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Jones is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Jones has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jon Jones over Brandon Vera. The model is firm on this one: Jones at 79%.

73%
Junior Dos Santos
Santos
15-7
Elo 1191
Striker
VS
Gonzaga
12-9
Elo 967
All-Rounder

The Heavyweight matchup features Junior Dos Santos (15-7) taking on Gabriel Gonzaga (12-9).

Santos is rated at 1191 — 224 points above Gonzaga's 967. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Santos's striker game against Gonzaga's submission artist approach. Santos brings a versatile approach, while Gonzaga is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.7 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Junior Dos Santos over Gabriel Gonzaga. We're leaning Santos here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

71%
Cheick Kongo
Kongo
11-5-1
Elo 1183
Striker
VS
Buentello
3-2
Elo 1019
Knockout Artist

The Heavyweight matchup features Cheick Kongo (11-5-1) taking on Paul Buentello (3-2). Kongo is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Kongo is rated at 1183 — 164 points above Buentello's 1019. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Kongo brings a versatile approach, while Buentello is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Buentello the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Buentello throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Kongo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Buentello has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cheick Kongo over Paul Buentello. We're leaning Kongo here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

74%
Alessio Sakara
Sakara
6-7
Elo 931
Striker
VS
Irvin
4-5
Elo 855
Knockout Artist

The Middleweight matchup features Alessio Sakara (6-7) taking on James Irvin (4-5). Irvin is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Sakara carries a modest Elo edge (931 to 855), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Sakara brings a versatile approach, while Irvin is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Irvin the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Irvin throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Sakara is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Sakara has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alessio Sakara over James Irvin. We're leaning Sakara here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

70%
Clay Guida
Guida
18-18
Elo 926
All-Rounder
VS
Gugerty
2-2
Elo 971

The Lightweight matchup features Clay Guida (18-18) taking on Shannon Gugerty (2-2). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Gugerty.

Gugerty carries a modest Elo edge (971 to 926), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guida throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Guida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Guida has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Clay Guida over Shannon Gugerty. We're leaning Guida here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

52%
Eliot Marshall
Matyushenko
7-4
Elo 1126
Striker
VS
Marshall
3-2
Elo 889
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Vladimir Matyushenko (7-4) taking on Eliot Marshall (3-2). Marshall is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Matyushenko is rated at 1126 — 237 points above Marshall's 889. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Matyushenko looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Marshall is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Matyushenko the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marshall throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Matyushenko is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Marshall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eliot Marshall over Vladimir Matyushenko. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Marshall at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

51%
Duane Ludwig
Elkins
19-10
Elo 1113
Wrestler
VS
Ludwig
4-4
Elo 853
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Darren Elkins (19-10) taking on Duane Ludwig (4-4).

Elkins is rated at 1113 — 260 points above Ludwig's 853. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Elkins's wrestler game against Ludwig's striker approach. Elkins looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Ludwig brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ludwig throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Ludwig is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Elkins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Duane Ludwig over Darren Elkins. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Ludwig at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
John Howard
Howard
7-6
Elo 932
Striker
VS
Roberts
3-3
Elo 974
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features John Howard (7-6) taking on Daniel Roberts (3-3). Roberts is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Roberts carries a modest Elo edge (974 to 932), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Howard's striker game against Roberts's wrestler approach. Howard brings a versatile approach, while Roberts looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Howard throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Howard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.7 more per 15 minutes. Roberts has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Howard over Daniel Roberts. We're leaning Howard here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Brendan Schaub
Schaub
6-4
Elo 1154
Wrestler
VS
Gormley
0-1
Elo 768

The Heavyweight matchup features Brendan Schaub (6-4) taking on Chase Gormley (0-1).

Schaub is rated at 1154 — 386 points above Gormley's 768. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Schaub throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Gormley is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Schaub has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brendan Schaub over Chase Gormley. The model gives Schaub a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Mike Pierce vs Julio Paulino

Welterweight
81%
Mike Pierce
Pierce
9-4
Elo 1171
Submission Artist
VS
Paulino
0-1
Elo 884

The Welterweight matchup features Mike Pierce (9-4) taking on Julio Paulino (0-1).

Pierce is rated at 1171 — 287 points above Paulino's 884. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pierce throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Pierce is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Paulino has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mike Pierce over Julio Paulino. The model is firm on this one: Pierce at 81%.

Jason Brilz vs Eric Schafer

Light Heavyweight
57%
Jason Brilz
Brilz
3-3
Elo 944
Wrestler
VS
Schafer
3-5
Elo 877
Wrestler

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jason Brilz (3-3) taking on Eric Schafer (3-5). Schafer is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Brilz carries a modest Elo edge (944 to 877), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brilz throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Schafer is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Brilz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jason Brilz over Eric Schafer. The model gives Brilz a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.