UFC 110: Nogueira vs Velasquez: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, February 20, 2010·Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 110: Nogueira vs Velasquez lands on Saturday, February 20, 2010 in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia with 9 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Cain Velasquez vs Antonio Rodrigo NogueiraHeavyweightCain VelasquezStrong81%
Wanderlei Silva vs Michael BispingMiddleweightMichael BispingConfident71%
George Sotiropoulos vs Joe StevensonLightweightGeorge SotiropoulosLean60%
Ryan Bader vs Keith JardineLight HeavyweightRyan BaderStrong81%
Mirko Filipovic vs Anthony PeroshHeavyweightMirko FilipovicToss-up50%
Krzysztof Soszynski vs Stephan BonnarLight HeavyweightKrzysztof SoszynskiConfident67%
Chris Lytle vs Brian FosterWelterweightBrian FosterLean62%
CB Dollaway vs Goran ReljicMiddleweightCB DollawayStrong76%
James Te Huna vs Igor PokrajacLight HeavyweightJames Te HunaLean57%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

81%
Cain Velasquez
Velasquez
12-2
Elo 1589
Submission Artist
VS
Nogueira
5-5
Elo 1008
Submission Artist

The Heavyweight matchup features Cain Velasquez (12-2) taking on Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira (5-5).

Velasquez is rated at 1589 — 581 points above Nogueira's 1008. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Submission Artist" archetype — ground specialists who hunt for finishes off their back or from top position. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Velasquez throws significantly more leather — a 4.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Velasquez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.6 more per 15 minutes. Velasquez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cain Velasquez over Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira. The model is firm on this one: Velasquez at 81%.

71%
Michael Bisping
Silva
4-7
Elo 1282
Knockout Artist
VS
Bisping
20-8
Elo 1522
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Wanderlei Silva (4-7) taking on Michael Bisping (20-8).

Bisping is rated at 1522 — 240 points above Silva's 1282. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Silva's striker game against Bisping's all-rounder approach. Silva brings a versatile approach, while Bisping is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bisping throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Bisping is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Bisping has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Bisping over Wanderlei Silva. We're leaning Bisping here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
George Sotiropoulos
Sotiropoulos
7-3
Elo 918
Wrestler
VS
Stevenson
8-7
Elo 907
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features George Sotiropoulos (7-3) taking on Joe Stevenson (8-7). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Sotiropoulos.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Sotiropoulos at 918, Stevenson at 907. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sotiropoulos throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Sotiropoulos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Sotiropoulos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: George Sotiropoulos over Joe Stevenson. The model gives Sotiropoulos a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Ryan Bader vs Keith Jardine

Light Heavyweight
81%
Ryan Bader
Bader
14-5
Elo 1619
Wrestler
VS
Jardine
6-6
Elo 950
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ryan Bader (14-5) taking on Keith Jardine (6-6).

Bader is rated at 1619 — 668 points above Jardine's 950. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Bader's wrestler game against Jardine's striker approach. Bader looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Jardine brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jardine throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Bader is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Bader has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ryan Bader over Keith Jardine. The model is firm on this one: Bader at 81%.

50%
Mirko Filipovic
Filipovic
4-6
Elo 1145
Knockout Artist
VS
Perosh
5-6
Elo 872
Submission Artist

The Heavyweight matchup features Mirko Filipovic (4-6) taking on Anthony Perosh (5-6).

Filipovic is rated at 1145 — 273 points above Perosh's 872. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Filipovic's striker game against Perosh's submission artist approach. Filipovic brings a versatile approach, while Perosh is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perosh throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Perosh is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Perosh has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mirko Filipovic over Anthony Perosh. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Filipovic at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
Krzysztof Soszynski
Soszynski
6-2
Elo 975
All-Rounder
VS
Bonnar
8-6
Elo 1278
Wrestler

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Krzysztof Soszynski (6-2) taking on Stephan Bonnar (8-6). Bonnar is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Bonnar is rated at 1278 — 303 points above Soszynski's 975. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Bonnar has won 3 straight.

The style clash matters here: Soszynski is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Bonnar looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Bonnar the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Soszynski throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Soszynski is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Soszynski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Krzysztof Soszynski over Stephan Bonnar. We're leaning Soszynski here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Chris Lytle vs Brian Foster

Welterweight
62%
Brian Foster
Lytle
9-10
Elo 1330
Submission Artist
VS
Foster
2-2
Elo 1185

The Welterweight matchup features Chris Lytle (9-10) taking on Brian Foster (2-2). Foster will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Lytle at 1330 versus Foster at 1185. That 144-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lytle throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Foster is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Foster has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brian Foster over Chris Lytle. The model gives Foster a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

CB Dollaway vs Goran Reljic

Middleweight
76%
CB Dollaway
Dollaway
11-8
Elo 965
Wrestler
VS
Reljic
1-2
Elo 939

The Middleweight matchup features CB Dollaway (11-8) taking on Goran Reljic (1-2). Reljic will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Dollaway at 965, Reljic at 939. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Reljic throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollaway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.6 more per 15 minutes. Dollaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: CB Dollaway over Goran Reljic. The model is firm on this one: Dollaway at 76%.

James Te Huna vs Igor Pokrajac

Light Heavyweight
57%
James Te Huna
Huna
5-4
Elo 843
Striker
VS
Pokrajac
4-7
Elo 764
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features James Te Huna (5-4) taking on Igor Pokrajac (4-7).

Huna carries a modest Elo edge (843 to 764), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Huna's striker game against Pokrajac's all-rounder approach. Huna brings a versatile approach, while Pokrajac is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pokrajac throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Pokrajac is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Huna has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: James Te Huna over Igor Pokrajac. The model gives Huna a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.