UFC 305: Du Plessis vs. Adesanya: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 17, 2024·Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 305: Du Plessis vs. Adesanya lands on Saturday, August 17, 2024 in Perth, Western Australia, Australia with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Dricus Du Plessis vs Israel AdesanyaMiddleweightDricus Du PlessisLean61%
Kai Kara-France vs Steve ErcegFlyweightSteve ErcegStrong77%
Dan Hooker vs Mateusz GamrotLightweightMateusz GamrotStrong76%
Jairzinho Rozenstruik vs Tai TuivasaHeavyweightJairzinho RozenstruikLean65%
Carlos Prates vs Li JingliangWelterweightCarlos PratesStrong76%
Valter Walker vs Junior TafaHeavyweightJunior TafaLean55%
Ricardo Ramos vs Josh CulibaoFeatherweightJosh CulibaoLean59%
Casey O'Neill vs Luana SantosWomen's FlyweightLuana SantosLean65%
Jack Jenkins vs Herbert BurnsFeatherweightJack JenkinsStrong81%
Tom Nolan vs Alex ReyesLightweightTom NolanStrong83%
Song Kenan vs Ricky GlennWelterweightRicky GlennLean57%
Jesus Aguilar vs Stewart NicollFlyweightJesus AguilarToss-up54%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Dricus Du Plessis vs Israel Adesanya

MiddleweightTitle Fight
61%
Dricus Du Plessis
Plessis
9-1
CH-I1989
All-Rounder
VS
Adesanya
13-6
CH-III1638
Striker
Over/UnderOver 68%
Under 32%Over 68%

The Middleweight championship matchup features Dricus Du Plessis (9-1) taking on Israel Adesanya (13-6). Adesanya is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Plessis is rated at 1989 — 350 points above Adesanya's 1638. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Plessis rides a 9-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Plessis's all-rounder game against Adesanya's striker approach. Plessis is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Adesanya brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Plessis throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Plessis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Plessis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dricus Du Plessis over Israel Adesanya. The model gives Plessis a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Plessis at 50% implied while our model sees 61% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

77%
Steve Erceg
Kara-France
8-5
CO-II1397
Striker
VS
Erceg
4-3
CO-III1247
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 64%
Under 36%Over 64%

The Flyweight matchup features Kai Kara-France (8-5) taking on Steve Erceg (4-3). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Erceg.

Kara-France is rated at 1397 — 150 points above Erceg's 1247. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Kara-France's striker game against Erceg's all-rounder approach. Kara-France brings a versatile approach, while Erceg is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Erceg throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Erceg is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Kara-France has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Steve Erceg over Kai Kara-France. The model is firm on this one: Erceg at 77%. The market implies 30% for Kara-France, but our model sees only 23%. That 7-point gap favoring Erceg is worth watching.

76%
Mateusz Gamrot
Hooker
14-10
CO-I1533
Knockout Artist
VS
Gamrot
8-4
CH-III1694
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Lightweight matchup features Dan Hooker (14-10) taking on Mateusz Gamrot (8-4). Hooker is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Gamrot is rated at 1694 — 161 points above Hooker's 1533. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Hooker is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Gamrot looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Gamrot the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hooker throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Gamrot is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.0 more per 15 minutes. Gamrot has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mateusz Gamrot over Dan Hooker. The model is firm on this one: Gamrot at 76%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

65%
Jairzinho Rozenstruik
Rozenstruik
9-6
CO-I1561
Striker
VS
Tuivasa
8-9
CO-II1334
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Heavyweight matchup features Jairzinho Rozenstruik (9-6) taking on Tai Tuivasa (8-9). Rozenstruik will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Rozenstruik is rated at 1561 — 227 points above Tuivasa's 1334. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rozenstruik throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Tuivasa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Rozenstruik has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jairzinho Rozenstruik over Tai Tuivasa. The model gives Rozenstruik a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

76%
Carlos Prates
Prates
6-1
CH-I1941
Striker
VS
Jingliang
11-7
CO-II1397
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Carlos Prates (6-1) taking on Li Jingliang (11-7). Prates will look to use a 7-inch reach edge to control distance.

Prates is rated at 1941 — 544 points above Jingliang's 1397. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Prates throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Jingliang is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Jingliang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Carlos Prates over Li Jingliang. The model is firm on this one: Prates at 76%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

55%
Junior Tafa
Walker
4-1
CO-II1443
VS
Tafa
2-5
UC-I789
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Valter Walker (4-1) taking on Junior Tafa (2-5). Walker is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Walker is rated at 1443 — 654 points above Tafa's 789. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Walker rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Walker throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Walker is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.0 more per 15 minutes. Tafa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Junior Tafa over Valter Walker. The model gives Tafa a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 52% for Walker, but our model sees only 45%. That 7-point gap favoring Tafa is worth watching.

Ricardo Ramos vs Josh Culibao

Featherweight
59%
Josh Culibao
Ramos
8-7
MC-III908
All-Rounder
VS
Culibao
3-4-1
RK-III1036
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Featherweight matchup features Ricardo Ramos (8-7) taking on Josh Culibao (3-4-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Culibao at 1036 versus Ramos at 908. That 128-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Ramos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Culibao is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Ramos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ramos throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Ramos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.9 more per 15 minutes. Culibao has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Josh Culibao over Ricardo Ramos. The model gives Culibao a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 47% for Ramos, but our model sees only 41%. That 5-point gap favoring Culibao is worth watching.

Casey O'Neill vs Luana Santos

Women's Flyweight
65%
Luana Santos
O'Neill
6-2
CO-II1349
All-Rounder
VS
Santos
5-1
CO-III1301
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Casey O'Neill (6-2) taking on Luana Santos (5-1).

O'Neill carries a modest Elo edge (1349 to 1301), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: O'Neill is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Santos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Santos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. O'Neill throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Santos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Luana Santos over Casey O'Neill. The model gives Santos a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 44% for O'Neill, but our model sees only 35%. That 9-point gap favoring Santos is worth watching.

Jack Jenkins vs Herbert Burns

Featherweight
81%
Jack Jenkins
Jenkins
4-2
RK-III1062
Striker
VS
Burns
2-4
UC-I759
Submission Artist
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Featherweight matchup features Jack Jenkins (4-2) taking on Herbert Burns (2-4). Burns is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Jenkins is rated at 1062 — 304 points above Burns's 759. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Jenkins's striker game against Burns's submission artist approach. Jenkins brings a versatile approach, while Burns is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jenkins throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Burns is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Jenkins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jack Jenkins over Herbert Burns. The model is firm on this one: Jenkins at 81%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Tom Nolan vs Alex Reyes

Lightweight
83%
Tom Nolan
Nolan
4-1
CO-II1343
VS
Reyes
0-3
UC-I743
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Lightweight matchup features Tom Nolan (4-1) taking on Alex Reyes (0-3). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Nolan.

Nolan is rated at 1343 — 600 points above Reyes's 743. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Nolan rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nolan throws significantly more leather — a 5.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Reyes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nolan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tom Nolan over Alex Reyes. The model is firm on this one: Nolan at 83%.

Song Kenan vs Ricky Glenn

Welterweight
57%
Ricky Glenn
Kenan
6-5
RK-II1069
Striker
VS
Glenn
4-6-1
MC-II947
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Welterweight matchup features Song Kenan (6-5) taking on Ricky Glenn (4-6-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Kenan at 1069 versus Glenn at 947. That 122-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Kenan's striker game against Glenn's all-rounder approach. Kenan brings a versatile approach, while Glenn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kenan throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Kenan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Kenan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricky Glenn over Song Kenan. The model gives Glenn a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

54%
Jesus Aguilar
Aguilar
4-3
RK-III1024
Wrestler
VS
Nicoll
0-3
UC-III662
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Flyweight matchup features Jesus Aguilar (4-3) taking on Stewart Nicoll (0-3). Nicoll will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Aguilar is rated at 1024 — 362 points above Nicoll's 662. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aguilar throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Aguilar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Nicoll has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jesus Aguilar over Stewart Nicoll. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Aguilar at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.