UFC 102: Couture vs Nogueira: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 29, 2009·Portland, Oregon, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 102: Couture vs Nogueira lands on Saturday, August 29, 2009 in Portland, Oregon, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira vs Randy CoutureHeavyweightAntonio Rodrigo NogueiraLean55%
Thiago Silva vs Keith JardineLight HeavyweightThiago SilvaConfident66%
Jake Rosholt vs Chris LebenMiddleweightJake RosholtLean64%
Nate Marquardt vs Demian MaiaMiddleweightNate MarquardtLean62%
Brandon Vera vs Krzysztof SoszynskiLight HeavyweightBrandon VeraLean55%
Aaron Simpson vs Ed HermanMiddleweightAaron SimpsonLean61%
Gabriel Gonzaga vs Chris TuchschererHeavyweightGabriel GonzagaConfident65%
Mike Russow vs Justin McCullyHeavyweightJustin McCullyLean57%
Todd Duffee vs Tim HagueHeavyweightTodd DuffeeConfident67%
Mark Munoz vs Nick CatoneMiddleweightMark MunozToss-up53%
Evan Dunham vs Marcus AurelioLightweightEvan DunhamToss-up54%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

55%
Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira
Nogueira
5-5
Elo 1008
Submission Artist
VS
Couture
16-7
Elo 1248
Wrestler

The Heavyweight matchup features Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira (5-5) taking on Randy Couture (16-7). Nogueira is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Couture is rated at 1248 — 240 points above Nogueira's 1008. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Couture has won 3 straight.

The style clash matters here: Nogueira is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Couture looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Couture the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Couture throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Couture is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Nogueira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira over Randy Couture. The model gives Nogueira a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Thiago Silva vs Keith Jardine

Light Heavyweight
66%
Thiago Silva
Silva
6-3
Elo 1362
Knockout Artist
VS
Jardine
6-6
Elo 950
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Thiago Silva (6-3) taking on Keith Jardine (6-6).

Silva is rated at 1362 — 412 points above Jardine's 950. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Silva's submission artist game against Jardine's striker approach. Silva is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Jardine brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jardine throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Jardine has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thiago Silva over Keith Jardine. We're leaning Silva here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Jake Rosholt vs Chris Leben

Middleweight
64%
Jake Rosholt
Rosholt
1-1
Elo 989
VS
Leben
12-9
Elo 855
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Jake Rosholt (1-1) taking on Chris Leben (12-9).

There's a real Elo separation here: Rosholt at 989 versus Leben at 855. That 134-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Leben throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Rosholt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 13.5 more per 15 minutes. Rosholt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jake Rosholt over Chris Leben. The model gives Rosholt a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Nate Marquardt
Marquardt
13-11
Elo 1064
All-Rounder
VS
Maia
22-10
Elo 1371
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Nate Marquardt (13-11) taking on Demian Maia (22-10).

Maia is rated at 1371 — 307 points above Marquardt's 1064. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Submission Artist" archetype — ground specialists who hunt for finishes off their back or from top position. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marquardt throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Maia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Marquardt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nate Marquardt over Demian Maia. The model gives Marquardt a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Brandon Vera vs Krzysztof Soszynski

Light Heavyweight
55%
Brandon Vera
Vera
8-6
Elo 945
All-Rounder
VS
Soszynski
6-2
Elo 975
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brandon Vera (8-6) taking on Krzysztof Soszynski (6-2).

Soszynski carries a modest Elo edge (975 to 945), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Vera's knockout artist game against Soszynski's all-rounder approach. Vera is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Soszynski is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Soszynski is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Soszynski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brandon Vera over Krzysztof Soszynski. The model gives Vera a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Aaron Simpson vs Ed Herman

Middleweight
61%
Aaron Simpson
Simpson
7-3
Elo 1097
Wrestler
VS
Herman
13-11
Elo 1045
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Aaron Simpson (7-3) taking on Ed Herman (13-11). Herman will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Simpson carries a modest Elo edge (1097 to 1045), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Simpson throws significantly more leather — a 6.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Simpson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.7 more per 15 minutes. Simpson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aaron Simpson over Ed Herman. The model gives Simpson a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

65%
Gabriel Gonzaga
Gonzaga
12-9
Elo 967
All-Rounder
VS
Tuchscherer
1-2
Elo 759

The Heavyweight matchup features Gabriel Gonzaga (12-9) taking on Chris Tuchscherer (1-2).

Gonzaga is rated at 967 — 208 points above Tuchscherer's 759. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gonzaga throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Tuchscherer has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gabriel Gonzaga over Chris Tuchscherer. We're leaning Gonzaga here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

57%
Justin McCully
Russow
4-1
Elo 1027
Wrestler
VS
McCully
2-1
Elo 974

The Heavyweight matchup features Mike Russow (4-1) taking on Justin McCully (2-1).

Russow carries a modest Elo edge (1027 to 974), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. McCully throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. McCully is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Russow has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Justin McCully over Mike Russow. The model gives McCully a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Todd Duffee vs Tim Hague

Heavyweight
67%
Todd Duffee
Duffee
3-2
Elo 1133
Striker
VS
Hague
1-3
Elo 819

The Heavyweight matchup features Todd Duffee (3-2) taking on Tim Hague (1-3).

Duffee is rated at 1133 — 314 points above Hague's 819. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hague throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Hague is far more active with takedowns, averaging 8.8 more per 15 minutes. Duffee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Todd Duffee over Tim Hague. We're leaning Duffee here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Mark Munoz vs Nick Catone

Middleweight
53%
Mark Munoz
Munoz
8-6
Elo 1082
Wrestler
VS
Catone
3-4
Elo 1004
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Mark Munoz (8-6) taking on Nick Catone (3-4).

Munoz carries a modest Elo edge (1082 to 1004), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Munoz throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Catone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 7.0 more per 15 minutes. Catone has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Munoz over Nick Catone. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Munoz at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

54%
Evan Dunham
Dunham
11-8-1
Elo 1019
All-Rounder
VS
Aurelio
2-3
Elo 969
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Evan Dunham (11-8-1) taking on Marcus Aurelio (2-3). Aurelio will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Dunham carries a modest Elo edge (1019 to 969), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dunham throws significantly more leather — a 3.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Aurelio is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Aurelio has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Evan Dunham over Marcus Aurelio. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dunham at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.