UFC 326: Holloway vs. Oliveira 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 7, 2026·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 326: Holloway vs. Oliveira 2 lands on Saturday, March 7, 2026 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 12 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Charles Oliveira vs Max HollowayLightweightMax HollowayLean62%
Caio Borralho vs Reinier de RidderMiddleweightCaio BorralhoLean65%
Raul Rosas Jr. vs Rob FontBantamweightRaul Rosas Jr.Confident73%
Drew Dober vs Michael JohnsonLightweightDrew DoberToss-up50%
Gregory Rodrigues vs Brunno FerreiraMiddleweightGregory RodriguesConfident65%
Cody Garbrandt vs Xiao LongBantamweightCody GarbrandtToss-up52%
Donte Johnson vs Cody BrundageMiddleweightDonte JohnsonStrong90%
Alberto Montes vs Ricky TurciosFeatherweightAlberto MontesLean62%
Nyamjargal Tumendemberel vs Cody DurdenFlyweightNyamjargal TumendemberelConfident66%
Sumudaerji vs Jesus AguilarFlyweightSumudaerjiLean65%
Diyar Nurgozhay vs Rafael TobiasLight HeavyweightRafael TobiasConfident69%
Rodolfo Bellato vs Luke FernandezLight HeavyweightLuke FernandezConfident68%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

62%
Max Holloway
Oliveira
25-11
CH-I1974
Wrestler
VS
Holloway
23-9
CH-I1901
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Lightweight matchup features Charles Oliveira (25-11) taking on Max Holloway (23-9). Oliveira will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Oliveira carries a modest Elo edge (1974 to 1901), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Oliveira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Holloway is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Oliveira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Holloway throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Oliveira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Holloway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Max Holloway over Charles Oliveira. The model gives Holloway a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

65%
Caio Borralho
Borralho
8-1
CH-II1755
All-Rounder
VS
Ridder
4-2
CO-I1554
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Middleweight matchup features Caio Borralho (8-1) taking on Reinier de Ridder (4-2). Ridder is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Borralho is rated at 1755 — 202 points above Ridder's 1554. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Borralho is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Ridder looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Ridder the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Borralho throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Ridder is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Borralho has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Caio Borralho over Reinier de Ridder. The model gives Borralho a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Raul Rosas Jr. vs Rob Font

Bantamweight
73%
Raul Rosas Jr.
Jr.
6-1
CO-II1437
Wrestler
VS
Font
12-9
CO-II1406
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Bantamweight matchup features Raul Rosas Jr. (6-1) taking on Rob Font (12-9). Font will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jr. carries a modest Elo edge (1437 to 1406), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm. Jr. rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Jr. looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Font is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Jr. the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Font throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Jr. is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.8 more per 15 minutes. Font has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Raul Rosas Jr. over Rob Font. We're leaning Jr. here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

50%
Drew Dober
Dober
15-11
CO-III1301
All-Rounder
VS
Johnson
16-16
RK-I1155
Striker
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Drew Dober (15-11) taking on Michael Johnson (16-16). Johnson is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Dober at 1301 versus Johnson at 1155. That 146-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Johnson has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Dober's all-rounder game against Johnson's striker approach. Dober is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Johnson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dober throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Drew Dober over Michael Johnson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dober at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 64% for Dober, but our model sees only 50%. That 14-point gap favoring Johnson is worth watching.

65%
Gregory Rodrigues
Rodrigues
10-3
CH-III1649
All-Rounder
VS
Ferreira
6-3
CO-II1352
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Middleweight matchup features Gregory Rodrigues (10-3) taking on Brunno Ferreira (6-3). Rodrigues is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Rodrigues is rated at 1649 — 296 points above Ferreira's 1352. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ferreira has won 3 straight.

The style clash matters here: Rodrigues is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Ferreira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Ferreira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodrigues throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Rodrigues is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Ferreira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gregory Rodrigues over Brunno Ferreira. We're leaning Rodrigues here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Rodrigues at 59% implied while our model sees 65% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

Cody Garbrandt vs Xiao Long

Bantamweight
52%
Cody Garbrandt
Garbrandt
10-7
CO-III1313
Striker
VS
Long
1-3
MC-I981
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Bantamweight matchup features Cody Garbrandt (10-7) taking on Xiao Long (1-3). Long will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Garbrandt is rated at 1313 — 332 points above Long's 981. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Long throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Long is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Garbrandt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cody Garbrandt over Xiao Long. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Garbrandt at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

90%
Donte Johnson
Johnson
2-0
RK-I1177
VS
Brundage
5-8
PR-I875
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Middleweight matchup features Donte Johnson (2-0) taking on Cody Brundage (5-8). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Brundage.

Johnson is rated at 1177 — 303 points above Brundage's 875. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brundage throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Donte Johnson over Cody Brundage. The model is firm on this one: Johnson at 90%. Notably, the betting market has Johnson at 86% implied while our model sees 90% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

62%
Alberto Montes
Montes
1-0
RK-II1079
VS
Turcios
2-4
UC-I746
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Featherweight matchup features Alberto Montes (1-0) taking on Ricky Turcios (2-4). Turcios is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Montes is rated at 1079 — 333 points above Turcios's 746. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Turcios throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Turcios is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Montes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alberto Montes over Ricky Turcios. The model gives Montes a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

66%
Nyamjargal Tumendemberel
Tumendemberel
2-1
RK-I1170
VS
Durden
6-8-1
MC-III915
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Flyweight matchup features Nyamjargal Tumendemberel (2-1) taking on Cody Durden (6-8-1). Tumendemberel will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Tumendemberel is rated at 1170 — 256 points above Durden's 915. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Durden throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Durden is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Tumendemberel has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nyamjargal Tumendemberel over Cody Durden. We're leaning Tumendemberel here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

65%
Sumudaerji
Sumudaerji
6-4
RK-I1173
All-Rounder
VS
Aguilar
4-3
RK-III1024
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Sumudaerji (6-4) taking on Jesus Aguilar (4-3). Sumudaerji is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 10-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Sumudaerji at 1173 versus Aguilar at 1024. That 149-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Sumudaerji rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Sumudaerji is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Aguilar looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Aguilar the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sumudaerji throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Aguilar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Aguilar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sumudaerji over Jesus Aguilar. The model gives Sumudaerji a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

Diyar Nurgozhay vs Rafael Tobias

Light Heavyweight
69%
Rafael Tobias
Nurgozhay
1-2
PR-I899
VS
Tobias
0-1
UC-I780
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Diyar Nurgozhay (1-2) taking on Rafael Tobias (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Nurgozhay at 899 versus Tobias at 780. That 119-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nurgozhay throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Nurgozhay is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.9 more per 15 minutes. Tobias has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafael Tobias over Diyar Nurgozhay. We're leaning Tobias here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Rodolfo Bellato vs Luke Fernandez

Light Heavyweight
68%
Luke Fernandez
Bellato
2-1-1
CO-III1222
VS
Fernandez
0-1
PR-II845
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Rodolfo Bellato (2-1-1) taking on Luke Fernandez (0-1).

Bellato is rated at 1222 — 377 points above Fernandez's 845. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bellato throws significantly more leather — a 5.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Bellato is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Fernandez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Luke Fernandez over Rodolfo Bellato. We're leaning Fernandez here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.