UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Duncan: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, April 4, 2026·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs. Duncan lands on Saturday, April 4, 2026 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Renato Moicano vs Chris DuncanLightweightRenato MoicanoLean56%
Virna Jandiroba vs Tabatha RicciWomen's StrawweightVirna JandirobaLean62%
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev vs Brendson RibeiroLight HeavyweightAbdul Rakhman YakhyaevStrong80%
Ethyn Ewing vs Rafael EstevamBantamweightRafael EstevamToss-up55%
Tommy McMillen vs Manolo ZecchiniFeatherweightTommy McMillenStrong92%
Jose Delano vs Robert RuchalaFeatherweightJose DelanoConfident66%
Thomas Petersen vs Guilherme PatHeavyweightGuilherme PatLean56%
Alessandro Costa vs Stewart NicollFlyweightAlessandro CostaStrong83%
Darrius Flowers vs Lando VannataLightweightLando VannataStrong77%
Alice Pereira vs Hailey CowanWomen's BantamweightAlice PereiraConfident67%
Tresean Gore vs Azamat BekoevMiddleweightAzamat BekoevToss-up50%
Dione Barbosa vs Melissa GattoWomen's FlyweightMelissa GattoLean60%
Kai Kamaka vs Dakota HopeLightweightDakota HopeToss-up55%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

56%
Renato Moicano
Moicano
13-7
CH-III1641
Wrestler
VS
Duncan
6-2
CO-II1379
Submission Artist
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Lightweight matchup features Renato Moicano (13-7) taking on Chris Duncan (6-2).

Moicano is rated at 1641 — 262 points above Duncan's 1379. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Duncan has won 4 straight.

The style clash matters here: Moicano looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Duncan is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 55% win rate against submission artists, giving Moicano the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Duncan throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Duncan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Moicano has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Renato Moicano over Chris Duncan. The model gives Moicano a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Moicano at 36% implied while our model sees 56% — a 19-point disagreement that could signal value.

Virna Jandiroba vs Tabatha Ricci

Women's Strawweight
62%
Virna Jandiroba
Jandiroba
9-4
CO-I1586
Wrestler
VS
Ricci
7-4
CO-II1358
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 64%
Under 36%Over 64%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Virna Jandiroba (9-4) taking on Tabatha Ricci (7-4). Jandiroba is the bigger frame at 5'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Jandiroba is rated at 1586 — 228 points above Ricci's 1358. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Jandiroba looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Ricci is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Jandiroba the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ricci throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Jandiroba is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Ricci has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Virna Jandiroba over Tabatha Ricci. The model gives Jandiroba a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Jandiroba at 50% implied while our model sees 62% — a 12-point disagreement that could signal value.

80%
Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev
Yakhyaev
2-0
RK-I1190
VS
Ribeiro
2-5
MC-III901
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev (2-0) taking on Brendson Ribeiro (2-5). Ribeiro will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Yakhyaev is rated at 1190 — 289 points above Ribeiro's 901. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yakhyaev throws significantly more leather — a 8.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Yakhyaev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 26.3 more per 15 minutes. Yakhyaev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Abdul Rakhman Yakhyaev over Brendson Ribeiro. The model is firm on this one: Yakhyaev at 80%. The market implies 90% for Yakhyaev, but our model sees only 80%. That 10-point gap favoring Ribeiro is worth watching.

55%
Rafael Estevam
Ewing
2-0
CO-I1472
VS
Estevam
3-1
RK-II1084
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Bantamweight matchup features Ethyn Ewing (2-0) taking on Rafael Estevam (3-1).

Ewing is rated at 1472 — 388 points above Estevam's 1084. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Estevam has won 3 straight.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ewing throws significantly more leather — a 4.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Estevam is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Ewing has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafael Estevam over Ethyn Ewing. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Estevam at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 58% for Ewing, but our model sees only 45%. That 13-point gap favoring Estevam is worth watching.

92%
Tommy McMillen
McMillen
1-0
RK-II1096
VS
Zecchini
0-2
UC-II713
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Featherweight matchup features Tommy McMillen (1-0) taking on Manolo Zecchini (0-2). McMillen is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

McMillen is rated at 1096 — 382 points above Zecchini's 713. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Zecchini throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Zecchini is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. McMillen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tommy McMillen over Manolo Zecchini. The model is firm on this one: McMillen at 92%. Notably, the betting market has McMillen at 88% implied while our model sees 92% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

Jose Delano vs Robert Ruchala

Featherweight
66%
Jose Delano
Delano
1-0
RK-II1118
VS
Ruchala
0-2
PR-II856
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Featherweight matchup features Jose Delano (1-0) taking on Robert Ruchala (0-2).

Delano is rated at 1118 — 262 points above Ruchala's 856. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ruchala throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Ruchala is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Delano has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jose Delano over Robert Ruchala. We're leaning Delano here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 76% for Delano, but our model sees only 66%. That 10-point gap favoring Ruchala is worth watching.

56%
Guilherme Pat
Petersen
3-3
RK-II1123
Wrestler
VS
Pat
1-1
MC-II959
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Heavyweight matchup features Thomas Petersen (3-3) taking on Guilherme Pat (1-1). Pat is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Petersen is rated at 1123 — 164 points above Pat's 959. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pat throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Petersen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Pat has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Guilherme Pat over Thomas Petersen. The model gives Pat a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 50% for Petersen, but our model sees only 44%. That 6-point gap favoring Pat is worth watching.

83%
Alessandro Costa
Costa
3-3
RK-III1018
All-Rounder
VS
Nicoll
0-3
UC-III662
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Flyweight matchup features Alessandro Costa (3-3) taking on Stewart Nicoll (0-3).

Costa is rated at 1018 — 356 points above Nicoll's 662. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Costa throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Nicoll is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Costa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alessandro Costa over Stewart Nicoll. The model is firm on this one: Costa at 83%. Notably, the betting market has Costa at 76% implied while our model sees 83% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

77%
Lando Vannata
Flowers
1-3
RK-III1037
VS
Vannata
4-8-2
PR-II857
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Lightweight matchup features Darrius Flowers (1-3) taking on Lando Vannata (4-8-2).

Flowers is rated at 1037 — 180 points above Vannata's 857. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vannata throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Flowers is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Vannata has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Lando Vannata over Darrius Flowers. The model is firm on this one: Vannata at 77%. The market implies 33% for Flowers, but our model sees only 23%. That 9-point gap favoring Vannata is worth watching.

Alice Pereira vs Hailey Cowan

Women's Bantamweight
67%
Alice Pereira
Pereira
1-1
RK-III1048
VS
Cowan
0-3
UC-II670
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Alice Pereira (1-1) taking on Hailey Cowan (0-3). Pereira will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Pereira is rated at 1048 — 378 points above Cowan's 670. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cowan throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Cowan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Pereira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alice Pereira over Hailey Cowan. We're leaning Pereira here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Pereira at 54% implied while our model sees 67% — a 14-point disagreement that could signal value.

50%
Azamat Bekoev
Gore
3-4
RK-II1112
Submission Artist
VS
Bekoev
2-2
PR-II856
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Middleweight matchup features Tresean Gore (3-4) taking on Azamat Bekoev (2-2). Gore will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Gore is rated at 1112 — 256 points above Bekoev's 856. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bekoev throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Bekoev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Gore has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Azamat Bekoev over Tresean Gore. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Bekoev at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Dione Barbosa vs Melissa Gatto

Women's Flyweight
60%
Melissa Gatto
Barbosa
3-2
RK-I1144
VS
Gatto
3-3
RK-III1020
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Dione Barbosa (3-2) taking on Melissa Gatto (3-3). Gatto will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Barbosa at 1144 versus Gatto at 1020. That 125-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gatto throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Barbosa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Barbosa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Melissa Gatto over Dione Barbosa. The model gives Gatto a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 56% for Barbosa, but our model sees only 40%. That 16-point gap favoring Gatto is worth watching.

Kai Kamaka vs Dakota Hope

Lightweight
55%
Dakota Hope
Kamaka
2-2-1
PR-III828
VS
Hope
0-1
PR-III829
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Lightweight matchup features Kai Kamaka (2-2-1) taking on Dakota Hope (0-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Kamaka at 828, Hope at 829. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kamaka throws significantly more leather — a 5.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Kamaka is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Hope has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dakota Hope over Kai Kamaka. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hope at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.