UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Royval 2: Predictions & Analysis
UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Royval 2 lands on Saturday, February 24, 2024 in Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Royval vs Brandon MorenoFlyweight | Brandon Moreno | Strong | 84% |
| Brian Ortega vs Yair RodriguezFeatherweight | Yair Rodriguez | Confident | 65% |
| Daniel Zellhuber vs Francisco PradoLightweight | Daniel Zellhuber | Strong | 77% |
| Yazmin Jauregui vs Sam HughesWomen's Strawweight | Yazmin Jauregui | Strong | 88% |
| Manuel Torres vs Chris DuncanLightweight | Manuel Torres | Toss-up | 50% |
| Raoni Barcelos vs Cristian QuinonezBantamweight | Cristian Quinonez | Toss-up | 55% |
| Jesus Aguilar vs Mateus MendoncaFlyweight | Jesus Aguilar | Lean | 55% |
| Edgar Chairez vs Daniel LacerdaFlyweight | Edgar Chairez | Strong | 75% |
| Fares Ziam vs Claudio PuellesLightweight | Fares Ziam | Confident | 71% |
| Ronaldo Rodriguez vs Denys BondarFlyweight | Ronaldo Rodriguez | Lean | 57% |
| Felipe dos Santos vs Victor AltamiranoFlyweight | Felipe dos Santos | Confident | 74% |
| Muhammad Naimov vs Erik SilvaFeatherweight | Muhammad Naimov | Strong | 87% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
Brandon Royval vs Brandon Moreno
The Flyweight championship matchup features Brandon Royval (7-5) taking on Brandon Moreno (11-7-2).
Moreno carries a modest Elo edge (1417 to 1382), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
The style clash matters here: Royval looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Moreno is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Royval the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Moreno throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Moreno is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Moreno has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Brandon Moreno over Brandon Royval. The model is firm on this one: Moreno at 84%. The market implies 27% for Royval, but our model sees only 16%. That 11-point gap favoring Moreno is worth watching.
Brian Ortega vs Yair Rodriguez
The Featherweight matchup features Brian Ortega (8-5) taking on Yair Rodriguez (11-4). Rodriguez is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.
Rodriguez carries a modest Elo edge (1705 to 1653), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Rodriguez throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Ortega is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Ortega has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Yair Rodriguez over Brian Ortega. We're leaning Rodriguez here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 40% for Ortega, but our model sees only 35%. That 5-point gap favoring Rodriguez is worth watching.
Daniel Zellhuber vs Francisco Prado
The Lightweight matchup features Daniel Zellhuber (3-4) taking on Francisco Prado (1-4). Zellhuber is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 8-inch reach advantage.
There's a real Elo separation here: Zellhuber at 1109 versus Prado at 971. That 138-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
A few statistical edges stand out. Zellhuber throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Prado is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Zellhuber has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Daniel Zellhuber over Francisco Prado. The model is firm on this one: Zellhuber at 77%. Notably, the betting market has Zellhuber at 72% implied while our model sees 77% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.
Yazmin Jauregui vs Sam Hughes
The Women's Strawweight matchup features Yazmin Jauregui (3-2) taking on Sam Hughes (6-6).
Hughes is rated at 1201 — 223 points above Jauregui's 978. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Hughes has won 3 straight.
A few statistical edges stand out. Jauregui throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Hughes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Hughes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Yazmin Jauregui over Sam Hughes. The model is firm on this one: Jauregui at 88%. Notably, the betting market has Jauregui at 83% implied while our model sees 88% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.
Manuel Torres vs Chris Duncan
The Lightweight matchup features Manuel Torres (5-1) taking on Chris Duncan (6-2).
Torres is rated at 1559 — 180 points above Duncan's 1379. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Duncan has won 4 straight.
Stylistically this is Torres's knockout artist game against Duncan's submission artist approach. Torres is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Duncan is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Torres throws significantly more leather — a 4.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Duncan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Duncan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Manuel Torres over Chris Duncan. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Torres at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 62% for Torres, but our model sees only 50%. That 11-point gap favoring Duncan is worth watching.
Raoni Barcelos vs Cristian Quinonez
The Bantamweight matchup features Raoni Barcelos (10-4) taking on Cristian Quinonez (2-2). Quinonez will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.
Barcelos is rated at 1418 — 460 points above Quinonez's 959. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Barcelos rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.
A few statistical edges stand out. Quinonez throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Barcelos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Quinonez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Cristian Quinonez over Raoni Barcelos. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Quinonez at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Jesus Aguilar vs Mateus Mendonca
The Flyweight matchup features Jesus Aguilar (4-3) taking on Mateus Mendonca (0-3). Mendonca is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 9-inch reach advantage.
Aguilar is rated at 1024 — 241 points above Mendonca's 784. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Mendonca throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Mendonca is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Aguilar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jesus Aguilar over Mateus Mendonca. The model gives Aguilar a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.
Edgar Chairez vs Daniel Lacerda
The Flyweight matchup features Edgar Chairez (3-2) taking on Daniel Lacerda (0-5).
Chairez is rated at 1099 — 579 points above Lacerda's 520. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Lacerda throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Lacerda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Lacerda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Edgar Chairez over Daniel Lacerda. The model is firm on this one: Chairez at 75%. The market implies 79% for Chairez, but our model sees only 75%. That 4-point gap favoring Lacerda is worth watching.
Fares Ziam vs Claudio Puelles
The Lightweight matchup features Fares Ziam (8-2) taking on Claudio Puelles (5-4). Ziam is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
Ziam is rated at 1646 — 521 points above Puelles's 1125. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ziam rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.
Stylistically this is Ziam's striker game against Puelles's wrestler approach. Ziam brings a versatile approach, while Puelles looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Ziam throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Puelles is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Ziam has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Fares Ziam over Claudio Puelles. We're leaning Ziam here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Ziam at 65% implied while our model sees 71% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.
Ronaldo Rodriguez vs Denys Bondar
The Flyweight matchup features Ronaldo Rodriguez (2-1) taking on Denys Bondar (0-3). Bondar will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.
Rodriguez is rated at 901 — 244 points above Bondar's 657. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Bondar throws significantly more leather — a 4.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Bondar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Rodriguez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Ronaldo Rodriguez over Denys Bondar. The model gives Rodriguez a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.
Felipe dos Santos vs Victor Altamirano
The Flyweight matchup features Felipe dos Santos (1-3) taking on Victor Altamirano (2-4).
Santos carries a modest Elo edge (887 to 809), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Altamirano is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Altamirano has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Felipe dos Santos over Victor Altamirano. We're leaning Santos here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.
Muhammad Naimov vs Erik Silva
The Featherweight matchup features Muhammad Naimov (5-2) taking on Erik Silva (0-3).
Naimov is rated at 1165 — 476 points above Silva's 690. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Naimov throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Naimov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Muhammad Naimov over Erik Silva. The model is firm on this one: Naimov at 87%. Notably, the betting market has Naimov at 81% implied while our model sees 87% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.