UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Royval 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, February 24, 2024·Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Royval 2 lands on Saturday, February 24, 2024 in Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Brandon Royval vs Brandon MorenoFlyweightBrandon MorenoConfident73%
Brian Ortega vs Yair RodriguezFeatherweightYair RodriguezConfident71%
Daniel Zellhuber vs Francisco PradoLightweightDaniel ZellhuberLean58%
Yazmin Jauregui vs Sam HughesWomen's StrawweightYazmin JaureguiToss-up51%
Manuel Torres vs Chris DuncanLightweightChris DuncanToss-up54%
Raoni Barcelos vs Cristian QuinonezBantamweightCristian QuinonezLean63%
Jesus Aguilar vs Mateus MendoncaFlyweightMateus MendoncaToss-up51%
Edgar Chairez vs Daniel LacerdaFlyweightEdgar ChairezLean65%
Fares Ziam vs Claudio PuellesLightweightFares ZiamLean56%
Ronaldo Rodriguez vs Denys BondarFlyweightRonaldo RodriguezToss-up53%
Felipe dos Santos vs Victor AltamiranoFlyweightVictor AltamiranoLean56%
Muhammad Naimov vs Erik SilvaFeatherweightMuhammad NaimovConfident67%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Brandon Royval vs Brandon Moreno

FlyweightTitle Fight
73%
Brandon Moreno
Royval
7-4
Elo 1314
Knockout Artist
VS
Moreno
11-5-2
Elo 1410
All-Rounder

The Flyweight championship matchup features Brandon Royval (7-4) taking on Brandon Moreno (11-5-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Moreno at 1410 versus Royval at 1314. That 96-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Royval looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Moreno is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Royval the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moreno throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Moreno is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Moreno has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brandon Moreno over Brandon Royval. We're leaning Moreno here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

71%
Yair Rodriguez
Ortega
8-4
Elo 1490
All-Rounder
VS
Rodriguez
10-4
Elo 1559
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Brian Ortega (8-4) taking on Yair Rodriguez (10-4). Rodriguez is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Rodriguez carries a modest Elo edge (1559 to 1490), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodriguez throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Ortega is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Ortega has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yair Rodriguez over Brian Ortega. We're leaning Rodriguez here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Daniel Zellhuber
Zellhuber
3-2
Elo 1082
All-Rounder
VS
Prado
1-3
Elo 925

The Lightweight matchup features Daniel Zellhuber (3-2) taking on Francisco Prado (1-3). Zellhuber is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

Zellhuber is rated at 1082 — 157 points above Prado's 925. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Zellhuber throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Prado is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Zellhuber has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daniel Zellhuber over Francisco Prado. The model gives Zellhuber a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Yazmin Jauregui vs Sam Hughes

Women's Strawweight
51%
Yazmin Jauregui
Jauregui
3-1
Elo 948
VS
Hughes
5-5
Elo 1232
All-Rounder

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Yazmin Jauregui (3-1) taking on Sam Hughes (5-5).

Hughes is rated at 1232 — 284 points above Jauregui's 948. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jauregui throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Hughes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Hughes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yazmin Jauregui over Sam Hughes. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jauregui at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

54%
Chris Duncan
Torres
4-1
Elo 1482
Knockout Artist
VS
Duncan
5-1
Elo 1375
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Manuel Torres (4-1) taking on Chris Duncan (5-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Torres at 1482 versus Duncan at 1375. That 107-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Duncan has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Torres's knockout artist game against Duncan's all-rounder approach. Torres is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Duncan is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Torres throws significantly more leather — a 4.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Duncan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Duncan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Duncan over Manuel Torres. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Duncan at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

63%
Cristian Quinonez
Barcelos
9-4
Elo 1410
Wrestler
VS
Quinonez
1-1
Elo 915

The Bantamweight matchup features Raoni Barcelos (9-4) taking on Cristian Quinonez (1-1). Quinonez will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Barcelos is rated at 1410 — 495 points above Quinonez's 915. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Barcelos rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Quinonez throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Barcelos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Quinonez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cristian Quinonez over Raoni Barcelos. The model gives Quinonez a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Mateus Mendonca
Aguilar
3-2
Elo 1087
Wrestler
VS
Mendonca
0-2
Elo 821

The Flyweight matchup features Jesus Aguilar (3-2) taking on Mateus Mendonca (0-2). Mendonca is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

Aguilar is rated at 1087 — 266 points above Mendonca's 821. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mendonca throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Mendonca is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Aguilar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mateus Mendonca over Jesus Aguilar. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Mendonca at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

65%
Edgar Chairez
Chairez
1-2
Elo 1011
VS
Lacerda
0-4
Elo 619

The Flyweight matchup features Edgar Chairez (1-2) taking on Daniel Lacerda (0-4).

Chairez is rated at 1011 — 392 points above Lacerda's 619. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lacerda throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Lacerda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Lacerda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Edgar Chairez over Daniel Lacerda. The model gives Chairez a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Fares Ziam
Ziam
7-2
Elo 1556
Wrestler
VS
Puelles
5-3
Elo 1040
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Fares Ziam (7-2) taking on Claudio Puelles (5-3). Ziam is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Ziam is rated at 1556 — 516 points above Puelles's 1040. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ziam rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Ziam's striker game against Puelles's wrestler approach. Ziam brings a versatile approach, while Puelles looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ziam throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Puelles is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Ziam has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Fares Ziam over Claudio Puelles. The model gives Ziam a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

53%
Ronaldo Rodriguez
Rodriguez
2-0
Elo 953
VS
Bondar
0-2
Elo 738

The Flyweight matchup features Ronaldo Rodriguez (2-0) taking on Denys Bondar (0-2). Bondar will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Rodriguez is rated at 953 — 216 points above Bondar's 738. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bondar throws significantly more leather — a 4.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Bondar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Rodriguez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ronaldo Rodriguez over Denys Bondar. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Rodriguez at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
Victor Altamirano
Santos
1-2
Elo 908
VS
Altamirano
2-3
Elo 837
Striker

The Flyweight matchup features Felipe dos Santos (1-2) taking on Victor Altamirano (2-3).

Santos carries a modest Elo edge (908 to 837), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Altamirano is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Altamirano has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Victor Altamirano over Felipe dos Santos. The model gives Altamirano a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Muhammad Naimov vs Erik Silva

Featherweight
67%
Muhammad Naimov
Naimov
5-1
Elo 1112
Wrestler
VS
Silva
0-1
Elo 837

The Featherweight matchup features Muhammad Naimov (5-1) taking on Erik Silva (0-1).

Naimov is rated at 1112 — 275 points above Silva's 837. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Naimov throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Naimov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Muhammad Naimov over Erik Silva. We're leaning Naimov here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.